Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/56158 |
Resumo: | Studies regarding soil quality and health often need to be up-to-date, as they feed new models for quantifying agricultural impacts on the environment. This study was established to understand how types of vineyard cultivation (organic and conventional) affect soil chemical and microbial attribute dynamics throughout different seasons. Vineyard management had a strong effect on chemical soil attributes. Organic carbon and phosphorus were 2.8 and 2.0 times greater, respectively, in organic vineyards than in conventional vineyards. Metabolic quotient (qCO2) values were lowest in summer and autumn, with an average of 2.31-2.49 µg C-CO2 h-1 g-1 soil, under organic management, indicating greater microbial growing efficacy. Regardless of season and sampling position, organic soil had a higher C microbial biomass than conventional vineyards, with values ranging from 179.79 to 284.71 µg g-1 soil, which were similar to those of the adjacent forest soil. Overall, there were increases in both the microbial and the chemical attributes of soil under organic vineyards compared relative to conventional management, which might have been due to the continuous input of organic matter, crop rotation, and alternative plant protection and fertilizer compounds used in organic farming. |
id |
UEM-5_f3a564c52e40d5bb5085db0c2890daf5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/56158 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyardsSeasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyardsbasal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca.basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca.Studies regarding soil quality and health often need to be up-to-date, as they feed new models for quantifying agricultural impacts on the environment. This study was established to understand how types of vineyard cultivation (organic and conventional) affect soil chemical and microbial attribute dynamics throughout different seasons. Vineyard management had a strong effect on chemical soil attributes. Organic carbon and phosphorus were 2.8 and 2.0 times greater, respectively, in organic vineyards than in conventional vineyards. Metabolic quotient (qCO2) values were lowest in summer and autumn, with an average of 2.31-2.49 µg C-CO2 h-1 g-1 soil, under organic management, indicating greater microbial growing efficacy. Regardless of season and sampling position, organic soil had a higher C microbial biomass than conventional vineyards, with values ranging from 179.79 to 284.71 µg g-1 soil, which were similar to those of the adjacent forest soil. Overall, there were increases in both the microbial and the chemical attributes of soil under organic vineyards compared relative to conventional management, which might have been due to the continuous input of organic matter, crop rotation, and alternative plant protection and fertilizer compounds used in organic farming.Studies regarding soil quality and health often need to be up-to-date, as they feed new models for quantifying agricultural impacts on the environment. This study was established to understand how types of vineyard cultivation (organic and conventional) affect soil chemical and microbial attribute dynamics throughout different seasons. Vineyard management had a strong effect on chemical soil attributes. Organic carbon and phosphorus were 2.8 and 2.0 times greater, respectively, in organic vineyards than in conventional vineyards. Metabolic quotient (qCO2) values were lowest in summer and autumn, with an average of 2.31-2.49 µg C-CO2 h-1 g-1 soil, under organic management, indicating greater microbial growing efficacy. Regardless of season and sampling position, organic soil had a higher C microbial biomass than conventional vineyards, with values ranging from 179.79 to 284.71 µg g-1 soil, which were similar to those of the adjacent forest soil. Overall, there were increases in both the microbial and the chemical attributes of soil under organic vineyards compared relative to conventional management, which might have been due to the continuous input of organic matter, crop rotation, and alternative plant protection and fertilizer compounds used in organic farming.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2022-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/5615810.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.56158Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e56158Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e561581807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/56158/751375154799Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmaral, Higo Forlan Schwan-Estrada , Kátia Regina Freitas Sena, José Ozinaldo Alves deColozzi-Filho, Arnaldo Andrade, Diva Souza2023-01-31T19:23:25Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/56158Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2023-01-31T19:23:25Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
title |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
spellingShingle |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards Amaral, Higo Forlan basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca. basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca. |
title_short |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
title_full |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
title_fullStr |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
title_full_unstemmed |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
title_sort |
Seasonal variations in soil chemical and microbial indicators under conventional and organic vineyards |
author |
Amaral, Higo Forlan |
author_facet |
Amaral, Higo Forlan Schwan-Estrada , Kátia Regina Freitas Sena, José Ozinaldo Alves de Colozzi-Filho, Arnaldo Andrade, Diva Souza |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schwan-Estrada , Kátia Regina Freitas Sena, José Ozinaldo Alves de Colozzi-Filho, Arnaldo Andrade, Diva Souza |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Amaral, Higo Forlan Schwan-Estrada , Kátia Regina Freitas Sena, José Ozinaldo Alves de Colozzi-Filho, Arnaldo Andrade, Diva Souza |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca. basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca. |
topic |
basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca. basal respiration; flux C microbial; metabolic quotient; microbial biomass; Vitis labrusca. |
description |
Studies regarding soil quality and health often need to be up-to-date, as they feed new models for quantifying agricultural impacts on the environment. This study was established to understand how types of vineyard cultivation (organic and conventional) affect soil chemical and microbial attribute dynamics throughout different seasons. Vineyard management had a strong effect on chemical soil attributes. Organic carbon and phosphorus were 2.8 and 2.0 times greater, respectively, in organic vineyards than in conventional vineyards. Metabolic quotient (qCO2) values were lowest in summer and autumn, with an average of 2.31-2.49 µg C-CO2 h-1 g-1 soil, under organic management, indicating greater microbial growing efficacy. Regardless of season and sampling position, organic soil had a higher C microbial biomass than conventional vineyards, with values ranging from 179.79 to 284.71 µg g-1 soil, which were similar to those of the adjacent forest soil. Overall, there were increases in both the microbial and the chemical attributes of soil under organic vineyards compared relative to conventional management, which might have been due to the continuous input of organic matter, crop rotation, and alternative plant protection and fertilizer compounds used in organic farming. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/56158 10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.56158 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/56158 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v45i1.56158 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/56158/751375154799 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e56158 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 45 (2023): Publicação contínua; e56158 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305901133266944 |