Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1403 |
Resumo: | Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the nutritive supply and substrates in beet seedling production in speedling tray, and its productive back effect. In the first experiment the seedlings germination and growth were analyzed and in the second experiment, the back effect of treatments was applied to the seedlings in the beet production when the seedlings from the same combinations of treatment were transplanted on the field. Experimental designs in completely randomized blocks were used respectively in factorial plots of 4 X 2, with three replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of four nutritive supply methods – M1) by fertirrigation; M2) full time floating hydropony; M3) daily floating hydropony from ten to fifteen hours; and M4) full time floating hydropony alternated by fertirrigation; and two substrates: S1) Plantmax®-HT and S2) crushed sugar cane. Results show that in the nursery phase, the fertirrigation (M1) was more effective in the emergency of the seedlings, M2 was more effective in the growth of the seedlings, while in the field phase, M1 and M2 were more productive. The crushed seedlings contributed to the greatest final plant population of the culture and it did not differ from the industrialized substrate production. |
id |
UEM-5_ffd1fb8a4678762a1d8b48d3ffbccd40 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/1403 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-5 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403Relação entre substratos e métodos de aplicação de solução nutritiva na produção de mudas e a posterior resposta produtiva da beterraba - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403Beta vulgaris L. var. crassahidroponiafertirrigaçãoprodução de mudas5.01.00.00-9 AgronomiaTwo experiments were carried out to evaluate the nutritive supply and substrates in beet seedling production in speedling tray, and its productive back effect. In the first experiment the seedlings germination and growth were analyzed and in the second experiment, the back effect of treatments was applied to the seedlings in the beet production when the seedlings from the same combinations of treatment were transplanted on the field. Experimental designs in completely randomized blocks were used respectively in factorial plots of 4 X 2, with three replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of four nutritive supply methods – M1) by fertirrigation; M2) full time floating hydropony; M3) daily floating hydropony from ten to fifteen hours; and M4) full time floating hydropony alternated by fertirrigation; and two substrates: S1) Plantmax®-HT and S2) crushed sugar cane. Results show that in the nursery phase, the fertirrigation (M1) was more effective in the emergency of the seedlings, M2 was more effective in the growth of the seedlings, while in the field phase, M1 and M2 were more productive. The crushed seedlings contributed to the greatest final plant population of the culture and it did not differ from the industrialized substrate production.Foram conduzidos dois experimentos com os objetivos de avaliar métodos de suprimento nutricional e substratos na produção de mudas de beterraba, em bandejas, e posterior efeito sobre a produção. No primeiro avaliou-se germinação e crescimento das mudas e no segundo avaliou-se o efeito dos tratamentos aplicados às mudas na produção da beterraba, quando as mudas oriundas das mesmas combinações de tratamentos foram transplantadas a campo. Adotou-se, respectivamente, os delineamentos experimentais inteiramente e em blocos casualizados, arranjados em esquema fatorial 4 x 2, com três repetições. Os tratamentos resultaram da combinação de quatro métodos de fornecimento de solução nutritiva – M1) por fertirrigação; M2) hidroponia por flutuação em tempo integral (HFTI); M3) hidroponia por flutuação diariamente das 10h às 15h; M4) HFTI alternada com fertirrigação – e dois substratos – S1) plantmax®-HT e S2) bagaço de cana-de-açúcar. Na fase de viveiro, verificou-se que M1 favoreceu a emergência, M2 favoreceu o crescimento das mudas, e, na fase de campo, M1 e M2 foram mais produtivas. Mudas formadas com bagaço proporcionaram maior estande final e produção equivalente à obtida com o substrato industrializado.Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-03-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/140310.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 27 No 3 (2005); 423-432Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 27 n. 3 (2005); 423-4321807-86211679-9275reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1403/835Santin, Melissa MariaSantos, Humberto SilvaScapim, Carlos AlbertoBrandão, Bernadete Maria SuakiBrandão Filho, José Usan TorresCallegar, OsniSantos, Ana Julia AlvarengaSantos, Isadora Alvarengainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-23T18:37:24Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/1403Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgronPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/oaiactaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br1807-86211679-9275opendoar:2022-11-23T18:37:24Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 Relação entre substratos e métodos de aplicação de solução nutritiva na produção de mudas e a posterior resposta produtiva da beterraba - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
title |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
spellingShingle |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 Santin, Melissa Maria Beta vulgaris L. var. crassa hidroponia fertirrigação produção de mudas 5.01.00.00-9 Agronomia |
title_short |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
title_full |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
title_fullStr |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
title_sort |
Relation between substrates and nutritive supply methods, applied to beet seedling production and productive back effect - DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
author |
Santin, Melissa Maria |
author_facet |
Santin, Melissa Maria Santos, Humberto Silva Scapim, Carlos Alberto Brandão, Bernadete Maria Suaki Brandão Filho, José Usan Torres Callegar, Osni Santos, Ana Julia Alvarenga Santos, Isadora Alvarenga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Humberto Silva Scapim, Carlos Alberto Brandão, Bernadete Maria Suaki Brandão Filho, José Usan Torres Callegar, Osni Santos, Ana Julia Alvarenga Santos, Isadora Alvarenga |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santin, Melissa Maria Santos, Humberto Silva Scapim, Carlos Alberto Brandão, Bernadete Maria Suaki Brandão Filho, José Usan Torres Callegar, Osni Santos, Ana Julia Alvarenga Santos, Isadora Alvarenga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Beta vulgaris L. var. crassa hidroponia fertirrigação produção de mudas 5.01.00.00-9 Agronomia |
topic |
Beta vulgaris L. var. crassa hidroponia fertirrigação produção de mudas 5.01.00.00-9 Agronomia |
description |
Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the nutritive supply and substrates in beet seedling production in speedling tray, and its productive back effect. In the first experiment the seedlings germination and growth were analyzed and in the second experiment, the back effect of treatments was applied to the seedlings in the beet production when the seedlings from the same combinations of treatment were transplanted on the field. Experimental designs in completely randomized blocks were used respectively in factorial plots of 4 X 2, with three replications. The treatments resulted from the combination of four nutritive supply methods – M1) by fertirrigation; M2) full time floating hydropony; M3) daily floating hydropony from ten to fifteen hours; and M4) full time floating hydropony alternated by fertirrigation; and two substrates: S1) Plantmax®-HT and S2) crushed sugar cane. Results show that in the nursery phase, the fertirrigation (M1) was more effective in the emergency of the seedlings, M2 was more effective in the growth of the seedlings, while in the field phase, M1 and M2 were more productive. The crushed seedlings contributed to the greatest final plant population of the culture and it did not differ from the industrialized substrate production. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-03-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1403 10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1403 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actasciagron.v27i3.1403 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAgron/article/view/1403/835 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; Vol 27 No 3 (2005); 423-432 Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy; v. 27 n. 3 (2005); 423-432 1807-8621 1679-9275 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaagron@uem.br||actaagron@uem.br|| edamasio@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799305903848030208 |