In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Amaral, Maurício Bordini do
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Viana, Rommel Bezerra, Viana, Katúcia Bezerra, Diagone, Cristina Aparecida, Denis, Aline Bassi, Plepis, Ana Maria de Guzzi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/41102
Resumo:  The goal of this study was to evaluate the in vitro cellular toxicity and biological behavior of new bone graft composites after subcutaneous implantation during remodeling and wound-healing processes. We developed composites based on hydroxyapatite (obtained by deproteinizing bovine bone), collagen (obtained from bovine tendon) and chitosan (obtained from gladii of the squid species Loligo), that were characterized by different techniques (X-ray, FT-IR, Thermogravimetry, DSC and SEM). Three biomaterials were evaluated here: B1 (collagen/chitosan/hydroxyapatite), B2 (collagen/hydroxyapatite) B3 (collagen/hydroxyapatite). For in vitro cytotoxicity tests, two cell lines were used: HEp human larynx tumor cells (ATCC-CCL-23) and VERO cells from African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). These toxicity tests demonstrated that the evaluated composites are not toxic. In biocompatibility tests, the results of a histological analysis showed that all three biomaterials present a low inflammatory tissue reaction. The tissue response was most favorable for sample B3, followed by B2 and B1, in that order. Based on these results, we conclude that all three biomaterials show good biocompatibility and no evidence of cytotoxicity; thus, these materials represent good candidates for tissue and graft engineering for use in bone regeneration.
id UEM-6_1fcad6d44d940330090325a7839cef6a
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/41102
network_acronym_str UEM-6
network_name_str Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagenscaffolds; tissue regeneration; immunohistochemistry; chitosan; hydroxyapatite; collagen. The goal of this study was to evaluate the in vitro cellular toxicity and biological behavior of new bone graft composites after subcutaneous implantation during remodeling and wound-healing processes. We developed composites based on hydroxyapatite (obtained by deproteinizing bovine bone), collagen (obtained from bovine tendon) and chitosan (obtained from gladii of the squid species Loligo), that were characterized by different techniques (X-ray, FT-IR, Thermogravimetry, DSC and SEM). Three biomaterials were evaluated here: B1 (collagen/chitosan/hydroxyapatite), B2 (collagen/hydroxyapatite) B3 (collagen/hydroxyapatite). For in vitro cytotoxicity tests, two cell lines were used: HEp human larynx tumor cells (ATCC-CCL-23) and VERO cells from African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). These toxicity tests demonstrated that the evaluated composites are not toxic. In biocompatibility tests, the results of a histological analysis showed that all three biomaterials present a low inflammatory tissue reaction. The tissue response was most favorable for sample B3, followed by B2 and B1, in that order. Based on these results, we conclude that all three biomaterials show good biocompatibility and no evidence of cytotoxicity; thus, these materials represent good candidates for tissue and graft engineering for use in bone regeneration.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2019-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/4110210.4025/actascitechnol.v42i1.41102Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e41102Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e411021806-25631807-8664reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/41102/751375148484Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Technologyhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAmaral, Maurício Bordini doViana, Rommel Bezerra Viana, Katúcia Bezerra Diagone, Cristina Aparecida Denis, Aline Bassi Plepis, Ana Maria de Guzzi 2020-05-05T15:19:28Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/41102Revistahttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/indexPUBhttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/oai||actatech@uem.br1807-86641806-2563opendoar:2020-05-05T15:19:28Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
title In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
spellingShingle In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
Amaral, Maurício Bordini do
scaffolds; tissue regeneration; immunohistochemistry; chitosan; hydroxyapatite; collagen.
title_short In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
title_full In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
title_sort In vitro and in vivo response of composites based on chitosan, hydroxyapatite and collagen
author Amaral, Maurício Bordini do
author_facet Amaral, Maurício Bordini do
Viana, Rommel Bezerra
Viana, Katúcia Bezerra
Diagone, Cristina Aparecida
Denis, Aline Bassi
Plepis, Ana Maria de Guzzi
author_role author
author2 Viana, Rommel Bezerra
Viana, Katúcia Bezerra
Diagone, Cristina Aparecida
Denis, Aline Bassi
Plepis, Ana Maria de Guzzi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Amaral, Maurício Bordini do
Viana, Rommel Bezerra
Viana, Katúcia Bezerra
Diagone, Cristina Aparecida
Denis, Aline Bassi
Plepis, Ana Maria de Guzzi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv scaffolds; tissue regeneration; immunohistochemistry; chitosan; hydroxyapatite; collagen.
topic scaffolds; tissue regeneration; immunohistochemistry; chitosan; hydroxyapatite; collagen.
description  The goal of this study was to evaluate the in vitro cellular toxicity and biological behavior of new bone graft composites after subcutaneous implantation during remodeling and wound-healing processes. We developed composites based on hydroxyapatite (obtained by deproteinizing bovine bone), collagen (obtained from bovine tendon) and chitosan (obtained from gladii of the squid species Loligo), that were characterized by different techniques (X-ray, FT-IR, Thermogravimetry, DSC and SEM). Three biomaterials were evaluated here: B1 (collagen/chitosan/hydroxyapatite), B2 (collagen/hydroxyapatite) B3 (collagen/hydroxyapatite). For in vitro cytotoxicity tests, two cell lines were used: HEp human larynx tumor cells (ATCC-CCL-23) and VERO cells from African green monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). These toxicity tests demonstrated that the evaluated composites are not toxic. In biocompatibility tests, the results of a histological analysis showed that all three biomaterials present a low inflammatory tissue reaction. The tissue response was most favorable for sample B3, followed by B2 and B1, in that order. Based on these results, we conclude that all three biomaterials show good biocompatibility and no evidence of cytotoxicity; thus, these materials represent good candidates for tissue and graft engineering for use in bone regeneration.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/41102
10.4025/actascitechnol.v42i1.41102
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/41102
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascitechnol.v42i1.41102
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/41102/751375148484
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Technology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Acta Scientiarum. Technology
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e41102
Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 42 (2020): Publicação contínua; e41102
1806-2563
1807-8664
reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
collection Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actatech@uem.br
_version_ 1799315336892252160