Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
DOI: | 10.4025/actascitechnol.v36i3.17736 |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/17736 |
Resumo: | Methods for the enrichment of an anaerobic sludge with H2-producing bacteria have been compared by using cassava processing wastewater as substrate.The sludge was submitted to three different pretreatments: 1) heat pretreatment by boiling at 98 °C for 15 min., 2) heat pretreatment followed by sludge washout in a Continuous Stirring Tank Reactor (CSTR) operated at a dilution rate (D) of 0.021 h-1, and 3) sludge washout as the sole enrichment method. The pretreated sludge and the sludge without pretreatment (control) were employed in the seeding of 4 batch bioreactors, in order to verify the volume and composition of the generated biogas. Maximum H2 production rates (Rm) from the pretreated sludges, were estimated by the modified Gompertz model. Compared to the control, H2 production was ca. 4 times higher for the sludge submitted to the heat pretreatment only and for the sludge subjected to heat pretreatment combined with washout, and 10 times higher for washout. These findings demonstrated that the use of sludge washout as the sole sludge pretreatment method was the most effective in terms of H2 production, as compared to the heat and to the combined heat and washout pretreatments. |
id |
UEM-6_3ce904f1cace53dbe61d2093aa557754 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/17736 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-6 |
network_name_str |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
spelling |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing WastewaterPretreatment on anaerobic sludge for enhancement of biohydrogen production from cassava processing wastewaterbiohidrogênioefluentestratamento anaeróbio3.07.02.00-3mixed cultureheat pretreatmentsludge washoutMethods for the enrichment of an anaerobic sludge with H2-producing bacteria have been compared by using cassava processing wastewater as substrate.The sludge was submitted to three different pretreatments: 1) heat pretreatment by boiling at 98 °C for 15 min., 2) heat pretreatment followed by sludge washout in a Continuous Stirring Tank Reactor (CSTR) operated at a dilution rate (D) of 0.021 h-1, and 3) sludge washout as the sole enrichment method. The pretreated sludge and the sludge without pretreatment (control) were employed in the seeding of 4 batch bioreactors, in order to verify the volume and composition of the generated biogas. Maximum H2 production rates (Rm) from the pretreated sludges, were estimated by the modified Gompertz model. Compared to the control, H2 production was ca. 4 times higher for the sludge submitted to the heat pretreatment only and for the sludge subjected to heat pretreatment combined with washout, and 10 times higher for washout. These findings demonstrated that the use of sludge washout as the sole sludge pretreatment method was the most effective in terms of H2 production, as compared to the heat and to the combined heat and washout pretreatments.Methods for the enrichment of an anaerobic sludge with H2-producing bacteria have been compared by using cassava processing wastewater as substrate. The sludge was submitted to three different pretreatments: 1) heat pretreatment by boiling at 98°C for 15 min., 2) heat pretreatment followed by sludge washout in a Continuous Stirring Tank Reactor (CSTR) operated at a dilution rate (D) of 0.021 h-1, and 3) sludge washout as the sole enrichment method. The pretreated sludge and the sludge without pretreatment (control) were employed in the seeding of 4 batch bioreactors, in order to verify the volume and composition of the generated biogas. Maximum H2 production rates (Rm) from the pretreated sludges were estimated by the modified Gompertz model. Compared to the control, H2 production was ca. 4 times higher for the sludge submitted to the heat pretreatment only and for the sludge subjected to heat pretreatment combined with washout, and 10 times higher for washout. These findings demonstrated that the use of sludge washout as the sole sludge pretreatment method was the most effective in terms of H2 production, as compared to the heat and to the combined heat and washout pretreatments.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2014-02-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/1773610.4025/actascitechnol.v36i3.17736Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 36 No 3 (2014); 437-444Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 36 n. 3 (2014); 437-4441806-25631807-8664reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/17736/pdf_10Lamaison, Franciele do CarmoFragata, RafaelAntônio, Regina VasconcellosAmante, Edna ReginaReginatto, Valeriainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-06-27T15:05:00Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/17736Revistahttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/indexPUBhttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/oai||actatech@uem.br1807-86641806-2563opendoar:2014-06-27T15:05Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater Pretreatment on anaerobic sludge for enhancement of biohydrogen production from cassava processing wastewater |
title |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater |
spellingShingle |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater Lamaison, Franciele do Carmo biohidrogênio efluentes tratamento anaeróbio 3.07.02.00-3 mixed culture heat pretreatment sludge washout Lamaison, Franciele do Carmo biohidrogênio efluentes tratamento anaeróbio 3.07.02.00-3 mixed culture heat pretreatment sludge washout |
title_short |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater |
title_full |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater |
title_fullStr |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater |
title_sort |
Pretreatment on Anaerobic Sludge for Enhancement of Biohydrogen Production from Cassava Processing Wastewater |
author |
Lamaison, Franciele do Carmo |
author_facet |
Lamaison, Franciele do Carmo Lamaison, Franciele do Carmo Fragata, Rafael Antônio, Regina Vasconcellos Amante, Edna Regina Reginatto, Valeria Fragata, Rafael Antônio, Regina Vasconcellos Amante, Edna Regina Reginatto, Valeria |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fragata, Rafael Antônio, Regina Vasconcellos Amante, Edna Regina Reginatto, Valeria |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lamaison, Franciele do Carmo Fragata, Rafael Antônio, Regina Vasconcellos Amante, Edna Regina Reginatto, Valeria |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biohidrogênio efluentes tratamento anaeróbio 3.07.02.00-3 mixed culture heat pretreatment sludge washout |
topic |
biohidrogênio efluentes tratamento anaeróbio 3.07.02.00-3 mixed culture heat pretreatment sludge washout |
description |
Methods for the enrichment of an anaerobic sludge with H2-producing bacteria have been compared by using cassava processing wastewater as substrate.The sludge was submitted to three different pretreatments: 1) heat pretreatment by boiling at 98 °C for 15 min., 2) heat pretreatment followed by sludge washout in a Continuous Stirring Tank Reactor (CSTR) operated at a dilution rate (D) of 0.021 h-1, and 3) sludge washout as the sole enrichment method. The pretreated sludge and the sludge without pretreatment (control) were employed in the seeding of 4 batch bioreactors, in order to verify the volume and composition of the generated biogas. Maximum H2 production rates (Rm) from the pretreated sludges, were estimated by the modified Gompertz model. Compared to the control, H2 production was ca. 4 times higher for the sludge submitted to the heat pretreatment only and for the sludge subjected to heat pretreatment combined with washout, and 10 times higher for washout. These findings demonstrated that the use of sludge washout as the sole sludge pretreatment method was the most effective in terms of H2 production, as compared to the heat and to the combined heat and washout pretreatments. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-02-26 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/17736 10.4025/actascitechnol.v36i3.17736 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/17736 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascitechnol.v36i3.17736 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/17736/pdf_10 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 36 No 3 (2014); 437-444 Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 36 n. 3 (2014); 437-444 1806-2563 1807-8664 reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
collection |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actatech@uem.br |
_version_ |
1822182870144253952 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.4025/actascitechnol.v36i3.17736 |