App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Memon, Zulfiqar Ali
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Munawar, Nida, Kamal, Maha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/62867
Resumo: A recent study shows that the most commonly used app stores, iOS app store and Android's play store had up to 2 million apps from where users can explore, purchase, share, download and install applications on a single click. More and more apps are being added daily which makes the app stores a large software repository. An enormous amount of data is provided by the end users in the form of user reviews. This data can provide valuable insights for acquiring requirements. User reviews include plenty of information as they contain information about faulty features (Bug reports), ideas for new features and improvements (feature requests), or user experience that can help app developers and vendors to achieve software enhancement and evolution tasks. As feature requests are the ones that are most helpful for the purpose of eliciting new requirements, the work is done on feature requests out of the 3 categories mentioned above. This study is conducted to provide a general approach that extracts feature request from user reviews. The proposed approach has five main building blocks, namely, (i) Extraction of Feature Requests, (ii) Feature Extraction from Feature Requests, (iii) topic modelling, (iv) sentiment analysis and (v) Classification into Functional Requirements (FR) and Non-Functional Requirements (NFR). Firstly, it finds the feature requests out of the reviews, then perform extraction of features from feature requests, then further work on grouping the features into topics, next apply sentiment analysis to mine the user opinions on the extracted topic and finally group them into Functional and Non-Functional requirements. This article provides the app developers a more user-centred definition of requirements and improvements. At the topic modelling phase, the results received the highest coherence score, 0.70, with k=22 topics. Sentiment analysis is used to classify feature request, with an accuracy of 80.20%, precision of 84.25%, and recall of 80.42%. With an accuracy of 84.4%, requirements are classified quite successfully as well.
id UEM-6_4bdb842382cfd3d30bad76b07e5dec23
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/62867
network_acronym_str UEM-6
network_name_str Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviewsApp store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviewsfeature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorizationfeature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorizationA recent study shows that the most commonly used app stores, iOS app store and Android's play store had up to 2 million apps from where users can explore, purchase, share, download and install applications on a single click. More and more apps are being added daily which makes the app stores a large software repository. An enormous amount of data is provided by the end users in the form of user reviews. This data can provide valuable insights for acquiring requirements. User reviews include plenty of information as they contain information about faulty features (Bug reports), ideas for new features and improvements (feature requests), or user experience that can help app developers and vendors to achieve software enhancement and evolution tasks. As feature requests are the ones that are most helpful for the purpose of eliciting new requirements, the work is done on feature requests out of the 3 categories mentioned above. This study is conducted to provide a general approach that extracts feature request from user reviews. The proposed approach has five main building blocks, namely, (i) Extraction of Feature Requests, (ii) Feature Extraction from Feature Requests, (iii) topic modelling, (iv) sentiment analysis and (v) Classification into Functional Requirements (FR) and Non-Functional Requirements (NFR). Firstly, it finds the feature requests out of the reviews, then perform extraction of features from feature requests, then further work on grouping the features into topics, next apply sentiment analysis to mine the user opinions on the extracted topic and finally group them into Functional and Non-Functional requirements. This article provides the app developers a more user-centred definition of requirements and improvements. At the topic modelling phase, the results received the highest coherence score, 0.70, with k=22 topics. Sentiment analysis is used to classify feature request, with an accuracy of 80.20%, precision of 84.25%, and recall of 80.42%. With an accuracy of 84.4%, requirements are classified quite successfully as well.A recent study shows that the most commonly used app stores, iOS app store and Android's play store had up to 2 million apps from where users can explore, purchase, share, download and install applications on a single click. More and more apps are being added daily which makes the app stores a large software repository. An enormous amount of data is provided by the end users in the form of user reviews. This data can provide valuable insights for acquiring requirements. User reviews include plenty of information as they contain information about faulty features (Bug reports), ideas for new features and improvements (feature requests), or user experience that can help app developers and vendors to achieve software enhancement and evolution tasks. As feature requests are the ones that are most helpful for the purpose of eliciting new requirements, the work is done on feature requests out of the 3 categories mentioned above. This study is conducted to provide a general approach that extracts feature request from user reviews. The proposed approach has five main building blocks, namely, (i) Extraction of Feature Requests, (ii) Feature Extraction from Feature Requests, (iii) topic modelling, (iv) sentiment analysis and (v) Classification into Functional Requirements (FR) and Non-Functional Requirements (NFR). Firstly, it finds the feature requests out of the reviews, then perform extraction of features from feature requests, then further work on grouping the features into topics, next apply sentiment analysis to mine the user opinions on the extracted topic and finally group them into Functional and Non-Functional requirements. This article provides the app developers a more user-centred definition of requirements and improvements. At the topic modelling phase, the results received the highest coherence score, 0.70, with k=22 topics. Sentiment analysis is used to classify feature request, with an accuracy of 80.20%, precision of 84.25%, and recall of 80.42%. With an accuracy of 84.4%, requirements are classified quite successfully as well.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2023-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/6286710.4025/actascitechnol.v46i1.62867Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 46 No 1 (2024): Em proceso; e62867Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 46 n. 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e628671806-25631807-8664reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/62867/751375156635Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Technologyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMemon, Zulfiqar AliMunawar, NidaKamal, Maha2024-02-08T19:23:27Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/62867Revistahttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/indexPUBhttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/oai||actatech@uem.br1807-86641806-2563opendoar:2024-02-08T19:23:27Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
title App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
spellingShingle App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
Memon, Zulfiqar Ali
feature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorization
feature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorization
title_short App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
title_full App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
title_fullStr App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
title_full_unstemmed App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
title_sort App store mining for feature extraction: analyzing user reviews
author Memon, Zulfiqar Ali
author_facet Memon, Zulfiqar Ali
Munawar, Nida
Kamal, Maha
author_role author
author2 Munawar, Nida
Kamal, Maha
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Memon, Zulfiqar Ali
Munawar, Nida
Kamal, Maha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv feature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorization
feature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorization
topic feature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorization
feature enhancement; feature requests; requirement engineering; user reviews; non-negative matrix factorization
description A recent study shows that the most commonly used app stores, iOS app store and Android's play store had up to 2 million apps from where users can explore, purchase, share, download and install applications on a single click. More and more apps are being added daily which makes the app stores a large software repository. An enormous amount of data is provided by the end users in the form of user reviews. This data can provide valuable insights for acquiring requirements. User reviews include plenty of information as they contain information about faulty features (Bug reports), ideas for new features and improvements (feature requests), or user experience that can help app developers and vendors to achieve software enhancement and evolution tasks. As feature requests are the ones that are most helpful for the purpose of eliciting new requirements, the work is done on feature requests out of the 3 categories mentioned above. This study is conducted to provide a general approach that extracts feature request from user reviews. The proposed approach has five main building blocks, namely, (i) Extraction of Feature Requests, (ii) Feature Extraction from Feature Requests, (iii) topic modelling, (iv) sentiment analysis and (v) Classification into Functional Requirements (FR) and Non-Functional Requirements (NFR). Firstly, it finds the feature requests out of the reviews, then perform extraction of features from feature requests, then further work on grouping the features into topics, next apply sentiment analysis to mine the user opinions on the extracted topic and finally group them into Functional and Non-Functional requirements. This article provides the app developers a more user-centred definition of requirements and improvements. At the topic modelling phase, the results received the highest coherence score, 0.70, with k=22 topics. Sentiment analysis is used to classify feature request, with an accuracy of 80.20%, precision of 84.25%, and recall of 80.42%. With an accuracy of 84.4%, requirements are classified quite successfully as well.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/62867
10.4025/actascitechnol.v46i1.62867
url http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/62867
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascitechnol.v46i1.62867
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/62867/751375156635
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Technology
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Scientiarum. Technology
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual De Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 46 No 1 (2024): Em proceso; e62867
Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 46 n. 1 (2024): Publicação contínua; e62867
1806-2563
1807-8664
reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
collection Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||actatech@uem.br
_version_ 1799315338145300480