The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/50363 |
Resumo: | The Finite Element Method analysis of machining processes has become a ubiquitous feature to the area, however, there sometimes occur considerable deviations between experimental and simulated results due to the inherent complexity of the process. The basis for such may conceivably be related to imprecisions in the material and friction modelling, besides improper setup of mesh parameters. Elements should be small enough to allow for the proper representation of the chip formation, but taking into account that the computational time increases accordingly with mesh downsizing. Simulations of the milling process of Inconel 718 were conducted using the software Thirdwave AdvantEdge under different cutting conditions for three different meshes. Power and temperature output were compared to experimental results, most of which were measured via Hall-effect sensors and thermographic camera, respectively. The tool cutting edge radius was found to be an important factor and was estimated using Scanning Electron Microscope images. The influence of the finite element mesh size was higher for harsher cutting conditions, with effects felt on machining power only. In this case, finer mesh produced results that showed a higher agreement with experimental data, but at higher computational cost as shown by analysis of elapsed processing time. Although errors higher than 40% were observed, power and temperature trends from simulations were always in accordance with that found in experimental tests. Comparisons with experimental data from other studies showed the errors tend to grow for higher feed and cutting speed, which indicates the constitutive model of the material is more adequate for softer machining conditions. Simulation time seemed to be exponentially proportional to the inverse of minimum element size, and measured values might serve as a reference for other users. |
id |
UEM-6_77cd59810ec2d8430265e8973938be3d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/50363 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-6 |
network_name_str |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718The Finite Element Method analysis of machining processes has become a ubiquitous feature to the area, however, there sometimes occur considerable deviations between experimental and simulated results due to the inherent complexity of the process. The basis for such may conceivably be related to imprecisions in the material and friction modelling, besides improper setup of mesh parameters. Elements should be small enough to allow for the proper representation of the chip formation, but taking into account that the computational time increases accordingly with mesh downsizing. Simulations of the milling process of Inconel 718 were conducted using the software Thirdwave AdvantEdge under different cutting conditions for three different meshes. Power and temperature output were compared to experimental results, most of which were measured via Hall-effect sensors and thermographic camera, respectively. The tool cutting edge radius was found to be an important factor and was estimated using Scanning Electron Microscope images. The influence of the finite element mesh size was higher for harsher cutting conditions, with effects felt on machining power only. In this case, finer mesh produced results that showed a higher agreement with experimental data, but at higher computational cost as shown by analysis of elapsed processing time. Although errors higher than 40% were observed, power and temperature trends from simulations were always in accordance with that found in experimental tests. Comparisons with experimental data from other studies showed the errors tend to grow for higher feed and cutting speed, which indicates the constitutive model of the material is more adequate for softer machining conditions. Simulation time seemed to be exponentially proportional to the inverse of minimum element size, and measured values might serve as a reference for other users.The Finite Element Method analysis of machining processes has become a ubiquitous feature to the area, however, there sometimes occur considerable deviations between experimental and simulated results due to the inherent complexity of the process. The basis for such may conceivably be related to imprecisions in the material and friction modelling, besides improper setup of mesh parameters. Elements should be small enough to allow for the proper representation of the chip formation, but taking into account that the computational time increases accordingly with mesh downsizing. Simulations of the milling process of Inconel 718 were conducted using the software Thirdwave AdvantEdge under different cutting conditions for three different meshes. Power and temperature output were compared to experimental results, most of which were measured via Hall-effect sensors and thermographic camera, respectively. The tool cutting edge radius was found to be an important factor and was estimated using Scanning Electron Microscope images. The influence of the finite element mesh size was higher for harsher cutting conditions, with effects felt on machining power only. In this case, finer mesh produced results that showed a higher agreement with experimental data, but at higher computational cost as shown by analysis of elapsed processing time. Although errors higher than 40% were observed, power and temperature trends from simulations were always in accordance with that found in experimental tests. Comparisons with experimental data from other studies showed the errors tend to grow for higher feed and cutting speed, which indicates the constitutive model of the material is more adequate for softer machining conditions. Simulation time seemed to be exponentially proportional to the inverse of minimum element size, and measured values might serve as a reference for other users.Universidade Estadual De Maringá2021-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/5036310.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.50363Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 43 (2021): Publicação contínua; e52363Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 43 (2021): Publicação contínua; e523631806-25631807-8664reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/50363/751375152292Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Scientiarum. Technologyhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCampos, Felipe dos Anjos Rodrigues Souza, Felipe Chagas Rodrigues de França, Pedro Henrique Pires Silva, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da2021-08-09T16:53:34Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/50363Revistahttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/indexPUBhttps://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/oai||actatech@uem.br1807-86641806-2563opendoar:2021-08-09T16:53:34Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
title |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
spellingShingle |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 Campos, Felipe dos Anjos Rodrigues mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718 mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718 |
title_short |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
title_full |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
title_fullStr |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
title_sort |
The effect of mesh parameters on computational cost and results in simulation of milling in Inconel 718 |
author |
Campos, Felipe dos Anjos Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Campos, Felipe dos Anjos Rodrigues Souza, Felipe Chagas Rodrigues de França, Pedro Henrique Pires Silva, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Souza, Felipe Chagas Rodrigues de França, Pedro Henrique Pires Silva, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Campos, Felipe dos Anjos Rodrigues Souza, Felipe Chagas Rodrigues de França, Pedro Henrique Pires Silva, Leonardo Rosa Ribeiro da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718 mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718 |
topic |
mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718 mesh downsizing; machining simulation; AdvantEdge; FEM; shoulder milling; Inconel 718 |
description |
The Finite Element Method analysis of machining processes has become a ubiquitous feature to the area, however, there sometimes occur considerable deviations between experimental and simulated results due to the inherent complexity of the process. The basis for such may conceivably be related to imprecisions in the material and friction modelling, besides improper setup of mesh parameters. Elements should be small enough to allow for the proper representation of the chip formation, but taking into account that the computational time increases accordingly with mesh downsizing. Simulations of the milling process of Inconel 718 were conducted using the software Thirdwave AdvantEdge under different cutting conditions for three different meshes. Power and temperature output were compared to experimental results, most of which were measured via Hall-effect sensors and thermographic camera, respectively. The tool cutting edge radius was found to be an important factor and was estimated using Scanning Electron Microscope images. The influence of the finite element mesh size was higher for harsher cutting conditions, with effects felt on machining power only. In this case, finer mesh produced results that showed a higher agreement with experimental data, but at higher computational cost as shown by analysis of elapsed processing time. Although errors higher than 40% were observed, power and temperature trends from simulations were always in accordance with that found in experimental tests. Comparisons with experimental data from other studies showed the errors tend to grow for higher feed and cutting speed, which indicates the constitutive model of the material is more adequate for softer machining conditions. Simulation time seemed to be exponentially proportional to the inverse of minimum element size, and measured values might serve as a reference for other users. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/50363 10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.50363 |
url |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/50363 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascitechnol.v43i1.50363 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciTechnol/article/view/50363/751375152292 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Scientiarum. Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Acta Scientiarum. Technology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual De Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Technology; Vol 43 (2021): Publicação contínua; e52363 Acta Scientiarum. Technology; v. 43 (2021): Publicação contínua; e52363 1806-2563 1807-8664 reponame:Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
collection |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta scientiarum. Technology (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||actatech@uem.br |
_version_ |
1799315337402908672 |