Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meyer, Paula Marques
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Machado, Paulo Fernando, Coldebella, Arlei, Cassoli, Laerte Dagher, Coelho, Karyne Oliveira, Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/666
Resumo: The objective of this study was to validate prediction models for milk urea nitrogen (MUN), aiming at evaluating utilization efficiency of diets for dairy cows. Data (8,833 observations) from Holstein cows were used. Milk production, body weight, days in milk and lactation number were collected on the milk sampling days. Milk samples were collected monthly for composition analysis. In order to evaluate the three models, accuracy, precision and robustness were tested. Despite being more accurate (mean bias=-0.21 mg/dL), model 3 was less precise (residual error=5.24 mg/dL) than model 2 (mean bias=-1.72 and residual error=4.90 mg/dL), while model 1 was the least accurate (mean bias=2.93 mg/dL) and the least precise (residual error=5.99 mg/dL). There was lack of robustness for the three models. Models for predicting MUN differ among themselves with regard to accuracy, precision and robustness.
id UEM-7_6fbd5b0bcb72d7dd8d69c9422e27f331
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/666
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666Validação de modelos de predição de nitrogênio uréico no leite, estimando-se o consumo individual pelo consumo do rebanho - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666excreção de nitrogêniomodelagemuréia no leiteutilização de proteínavaca leiteiraThe objective of this study was to validate prediction models for milk urea nitrogen (MUN), aiming at evaluating utilization efficiency of diets for dairy cows. Data (8,833 observations) from Holstein cows were used. Milk production, body weight, days in milk and lactation number were collected on the milk sampling days. Milk samples were collected monthly for composition analysis. In order to evaluate the three models, accuracy, precision and robustness were tested. Despite being more accurate (mean bias=-0.21 mg/dL), model 3 was less precise (residual error=5.24 mg/dL) than model 2 (mean bias=-1.72 and residual error=4.90 mg/dL), while model 1 was the least accurate (mean bias=2.93 mg/dL) and the least precise (residual error=5.99 mg/dL). There was lack of robustness for the three models. Models for predicting MUN differ among themselves with regard to accuracy, precision and robustness.O objetivo deste trabalho foi validar modelos de predição de nitrogênio uréico no leite (NUL), visando contribuir para avaliação nutricional de dietas de vacas. Foram utilizadas 8.833 observações de vacas holandesas de um rebanho comercial. A produção de leite, o peso vivo, o número de dias em lactação e o número de lactações foram coletados no dia da amostragem do leite. Amostras de leite foram coletadas mensalmente para determinação da sua composição. Para a avaliação dos 3 modelos, foram medidas acurácia, precisão e robustez. O modelo 3, apesar de mais acurado (viés=-0,21 mg/dL), foi menos preciso (erro residual=5,24 mg/dL) que o modelo 2 (viés=-1,72 e erro residual=4,90 mg/dL), enquanto o modelo 1 foi o menos acurado (viés=2,93 mg/dL) e o menos preciso (erro residual=5,99 mg/dL). Houve falta de robustez para os 3 modelos. Os três modelos de predição de NUL diferiram entre si quanto à acurácia, precisão e robustez.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2008-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/66610.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 28 No 1 (2006); 73-79Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 28 n. 1 (2006); 73-791807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/666/413Meyer, Paula MarquesMachado, Paulo FernandoColdebella, ArleiCassoli, Laerte DagherCoelho, Karyne OliveiraRodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazzainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:03:14Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/666Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:03:14Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
Validação de modelos de predição de nitrogênio uréico no leite, estimando-se o consumo individual pelo consumo do rebanho - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
title Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
spellingShingle Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
Meyer, Paula Marques
excreção de nitrogênio
modelagem
uréia no leite
utilização de proteína
vaca leiteira
title_short Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
title_full Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
title_fullStr Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
title_full_unstemmed Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
title_sort Validation of models to predict milk urea nitrogen concentrations, using herd intake to estimate individual dry matter intake - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
author Meyer, Paula Marques
author_facet Meyer, Paula Marques
Machado, Paulo Fernando
Coldebella, Arlei
Cassoli, Laerte Dagher
Coelho, Karyne Oliveira
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
author_role author
author2 Machado, Paulo Fernando
Coldebella, Arlei
Cassoli, Laerte Dagher
Coelho, Karyne Oliveira
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meyer, Paula Marques
Machado, Paulo Fernando
Coldebella, Arlei
Cassoli, Laerte Dagher
Coelho, Karyne Oliveira
Rodrigues, Paulo Henrique Mazza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv excreção de nitrogênio
modelagem
uréia no leite
utilização de proteína
vaca leiteira
topic excreção de nitrogênio
modelagem
uréia no leite
utilização de proteína
vaca leiteira
description The objective of this study was to validate prediction models for milk urea nitrogen (MUN), aiming at evaluating utilization efficiency of diets for dairy cows. Data (8,833 observations) from Holstein cows were used. Milk production, body weight, days in milk and lactation number were collected on the milk sampling days. Milk samples were collected monthly for composition analysis. In order to evaluate the three models, accuracy, precision and robustness were tested. Despite being more accurate (mean bias=-0.21 mg/dL), model 3 was less precise (residual error=5.24 mg/dL) than model 2 (mean bias=-1.72 and residual error=4.90 mg/dL), while model 1 was the least accurate (mean bias=2.93 mg/dL) and the least precise (residual error=5.99 mg/dL). There was lack of robustness for the three models. Models for predicting MUN differ among themselves with regard to accuracy, precision and robustness.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-02-15
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/666
10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/666
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.666
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/666/413
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 28 No 1 (2006); 73-79
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 28 n. 1 (2006); 73-79
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315356758573056