Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Atefi, Abbas
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Shadparvar, Abdol Ahad, Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, Navid
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/32023
Resumo: Accuracy of genomic prediction was compared using three parametric and semi parametric methods, including BayesA, Bayesian LASSO and Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression under various levels of heritability (0.15, 0.3 and 0.45), different number of markers (500, 750 and 1000) and generation intervals of validating set. A historical population of 1000 individuals with equal sex ratio was simulated for 100 generations at constant size. It followed by 100 extra generations of gradually reducing size down to 500 individuals in generation 200. Individuals of generation 200 were mated randomly for 10 more generations applying litter size of 5 to expand the historical generation. Finally, 50 males and 500 females chosen from generation 210 were randomly mated to generate 10 more generations of recent population. Individuals born in generation 211 considered as the training set while the validation set was composed of individuals either from generations 213, 215 or 217. The genome comprised one chromosome of 100 cM length carrying 50 QTLs. There was no significant difference between accuracy of investigated methods (p > 0.05) but among three methods, the highest mean accuracy (0.659) was observed for BayesA. By increasing the heritability, the average genomic accuracy increased from 0.53 to 0.75 (p < 0.05). The number of SNPs affected the accuracy and accuracies increased as number of SNPs increased; therefore, the highest accuracy was for the case number of SNPs=1000. With getting away from validating set, the accuracies decreased and the most severe decay observed in the case of low heritability. Decreasing the accuracy across generations affected by marker density but was independent from investigated methods. 
id UEM-7_9e86463dae42651bc9b5b2a5ee409e8f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/32023
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methodsaccuracygenomicsemi parametric methodsgenetic architectureAccuracy of genomic prediction was compared using three parametric and semi parametric methods, including BayesA, Bayesian LASSO and Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression under various levels of heritability (0.15, 0.3 and 0.45), different number of markers (500, 750 and 1000) and generation intervals of validating set. A historical population of 1000 individuals with equal sex ratio was simulated for 100 generations at constant size. It followed by 100 extra generations of gradually reducing size down to 500 individuals in generation 200. Individuals of generation 200 were mated randomly for 10 more generations applying litter size of 5 to expand the historical generation. Finally, 50 males and 500 females chosen from generation 210 were randomly mated to generate 10 more generations of recent population. Individuals born in generation 211 considered as the training set while the validation set was composed of individuals either from generations 213, 215 or 217. The genome comprised one chromosome of 100 cM length carrying 50 QTLs. There was no significant difference between accuracy of investigated methods (p > 0.05) but among three methods, the highest mean accuracy (0.659) was observed for BayesA. By increasing the heritability, the average genomic accuracy increased from 0.53 to 0.75 (p < 0.05). The number of SNPs affected the accuracy and accuracies increased as number of SNPs increased; therefore, the highest accuracy was for the case number of SNPs=1000. With getting away from validating set, the accuracies decreased and the most severe decay observed in the case of low heritability. Decreasing the accuracy across generations affected by marker density but was independent from investigated methods. Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2016-11-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/3202310.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.32023Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 38 No 4 (2016); 447-453Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 38 n. 4 (2016); 447-4531807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/32023/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAtefi, AbbasShadparvar, Abdol AhadGhavi Hossein-Zadeh, Navid2022-02-20T21:50:06Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/32023Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2022-02-20T21:50:06Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
title Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
spellingShingle Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
Atefi, Abbas
accuracy
genomic
semi parametric methods
genetic architecture
title_short Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
title_full Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
title_fullStr Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
title_sort Comparison of whole genome prediction accuracy across generations using parametric and semi parametric methods
author Atefi, Abbas
author_facet Atefi, Abbas
Shadparvar, Abdol Ahad
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, Navid
author_role author
author2 Shadparvar, Abdol Ahad
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, Navid
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Atefi, Abbas
Shadparvar, Abdol Ahad
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, Navid
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv accuracy
genomic
semi parametric methods
genetic architecture
topic accuracy
genomic
semi parametric methods
genetic architecture
description Accuracy of genomic prediction was compared using three parametric and semi parametric methods, including BayesA, Bayesian LASSO and Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces regression under various levels of heritability (0.15, 0.3 and 0.45), different number of markers (500, 750 and 1000) and generation intervals of validating set. A historical population of 1000 individuals with equal sex ratio was simulated for 100 generations at constant size. It followed by 100 extra generations of gradually reducing size down to 500 individuals in generation 200. Individuals of generation 200 were mated randomly for 10 more generations applying litter size of 5 to expand the historical generation. Finally, 50 males and 500 females chosen from generation 210 were randomly mated to generate 10 more generations of recent population. Individuals born in generation 211 considered as the training set while the validation set was composed of individuals either from generations 213, 215 or 217. The genome comprised one chromosome of 100 cM length carrying 50 QTLs. There was no significant difference between accuracy of investigated methods (p > 0.05) but among three methods, the highest mean accuracy (0.659) was observed for BayesA. By increasing the heritability, the average genomic accuracy increased from 0.53 to 0.75 (p < 0.05). The number of SNPs affected the accuracy and accuracies increased as number of SNPs increased; therefore, the highest accuracy was for the case number of SNPs=1000. With getting away from validating set, the accuracies decreased and the most severe decay observed in the case of low heritability. Decreasing the accuracy across generations affected by marker density but was independent from investigated methods. 
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/32023
10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.32023
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/32023
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v38i4.32023
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/32023/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 38 No 4 (2016); 447-453
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 38 n. 4 (2016); 447-453
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315361755037696