Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/52845 |
Resumo: | The present study was carried out to evaluate the substitution of synthetic performance enhancers by ethanolic propolis extract (EPE) in the diet of broilers and their effects on performance, carcass yield, noble cuts, viscera and bed quality. A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments and six replicates each, totaling 24 experimental plots with 20 birds each. The experimental treatments were: negative control, without the inclusion of performance improvement and EPE-free; positive control, containing avilamycin performance enhancer; Inclusion of 0.1% of EPE and; Inclusion of 0.2% EPE. The analyzed data were submitted to analysis of variance and applied the SNK test at 5% probability. There was no effect of the inclusion of additives on feed intake and feed conversion in the periods from 1 to 7, 1 to 21, and from 1 to 42 days of age. Weight gain was lower in birds receiving feed with the inclusion of 0.1% EPE in the period from 1 to 7 days, not differing from the other treatments in the other evaluation periods. Carcass characteristics, cuts, and viscera and bed moisture were not influenced by the treatments used. The inclusion of ethanol extract from propolis as a performance enhancer up to 42 days of age provided similar results to the use of performance enhancers based on avilamycin, thus being an efficient substitute in poultry production. |
id |
UEM-7_a58dc8ae092ad7e7ab4aead12728cee1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/52845 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler dietsReplacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler dietscutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial propertiescutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial propertiesThe present study was carried out to evaluate the substitution of synthetic performance enhancers by ethanolic propolis extract (EPE) in the diet of broilers and their effects on performance, carcass yield, noble cuts, viscera and bed quality. A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments and six replicates each, totaling 24 experimental plots with 20 birds each. The experimental treatments were: negative control, without the inclusion of performance improvement and EPE-free; positive control, containing avilamycin performance enhancer; Inclusion of 0.1% of EPE and; Inclusion of 0.2% EPE. The analyzed data were submitted to analysis of variance and applied the SNK test at 5% probability. There was no effect of the inclusion of additives on feed intake and feed conversion in the periods from 1 to 7, 1 to 21, and from 1 to 42 days of age. Weight gain was lower in birds receiving feed with the inclusion of 0.1% EPE in the period from 1 to 7 days, not differing from the other treatments in the other evaluation periods. Carcass characteristics, cuts, and viscera and bed moisture were not influenced by the treatments used. The inclusion of ethanol extract from propolis as a performance enhancer up to 42 days of age provided similar results to the use of performance enhancers based on avilamycin, thus being an efficient substitute in poultry production.The present study was carried out to evaluate the substitution of synthetic performance enhancers by ethanolic propolis extract (EPE) in the diet of broilers and their effects on performance, carcass yield, noble cuts, viscera and bed quality. A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments and six replicates each, totaling 24 experimental plots with 20 birds each. The experimental treatments were: negative control, without the inclusion of performance improvement and EPE-free; positive control, containing avilamycin performance enhancer; Inclusion of 0.1% of EPE and; Inclusion of 0.2% EPE. The analyzed data were submitted to analysis of variance and applied the SNK test at 5% probability. There was no effect of the inclusion of additives on feed intake and feed conversion in the periods from 1 to 7, 1 to 21, and from 1 to 42 days of age. Weight gain was lower in birds receiving feed with the inclusion of 0.1% EPE in the period from 1 to 7 days, not differing from the other treatments in the other evaluation periods. Carcass characteristics, cuts, and viscera and bed moisture were not influenced by the treatments used. The inclusion of ethanol extract from propolis as a performance enhancer up to 42 days of age provided similar results to the use of performance enhancers based on avilamycin, thus being an efficient substitute in poultry production.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2021-12-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5284510.4025/actascianimsci.v44i1.52845Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e52845Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e528451807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/52845/751375153372Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Scienceshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVieira, Wesley Caetano Geraldo, Adriano Zangerônimo, Márcio Gilberto Gonçalves, Jéssica Magela Avelar, Guilherme Salviano Costa, Lucas Marques Silva Valentim, Jean KaiqueGarcia, Rodrigo Garófallo2022-02-17T17:40:25Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/52845Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2022-02-17T17:40:25Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
title |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
spellingShingle |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets Vieira, Wesley Caetano cutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial properties cutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial properties |
title_short |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
title_full |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
title_fullStr |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
title_full_unstemmed |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
title_sort |
Replacement of performance enhancers by propolis ethanol extract in broiler diets |
author |
Vieira, Wesley Caetano |
author_facet |
Vieira, Wesley Caetano Geraldo, Adriano Zangerônimo, Márcio Gilberto Gonçalves, Jéssica Magela Avelar, Guilherme Salviano Costa, Lucas Marques Silva Valentim, Jean Kaique Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Geraldo, Adriano Zangerônimo, Márcio Gilberto Gonçalves, Jéssica Magela Avelar, Guilherme Salviano Costa, Lucas Marques Silva Valentim, Jean Kaique Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vieira, Wesley Caetano Geraldo, Adriano Zangerônimo, Márcio Gilberto Gonçalves, Jéssica Magela Avelar, Guilherme Salviano Costa, Lucas Marques Silva Valentim, Jean Kaique Garcia, Rodrigo Garófallo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
cutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial properties cutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial properties |
topic |
cutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial properties cutting poultry; growth stimulators; natural extracts; phytotherapy; antibacterial properties |
description |
The present study was carried out to evaluate the substitution of synthetic performance enhancers by ethanolic propolis extract (EPE) in the diet of broilers and their effects on performance, carcass yield, noble cuts, viscera and bed quality. A completely randomized design was used, with four treatments and six replicates each, totaling 24 experimental plots with 20 birds each. The experimental treatments were: negative control, without the inclusion of performance improvement and EPE-free; positive control, containing avilamycin performance enhancer; Inclusion of 0.1% of EPE and; Inclusion of 0.2% EPE. The analyzed data were submitted to analysis of variance and applied the SNK test at 5% probability. There was no effect of the inclusion of additives on feed intake and feed conversion in the periods from 1 to 7, 1 to 21, and from 1 to 42 days of age. Weight gain was lower in birds receiving feed with the inclusion of 0.1% EPE in the period from 1 to 7 days, not differing from the other treatments in the other evaluation periods. Carcass characteristics, cuts, and viscera and bed moisture were not influenced by the treatments used. The inclusion of ethanol extract from propolis as a performance enhancer up to 42 days of age provided similar results to the use of performance enhancers based on avilamycin, thus being an efficient substitute in poultry production. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-22 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/52845 10.4025/actascianimsci.v44i1.52845 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/52845 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v44i1.52845 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/52845/751375153372 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e52845 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 44 (2022): Publicação contínua; e52845 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799315363555442688 |