Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teleken, Jhony Tiago
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Galvão, Alessandro Cazonatto, Robazza, Weber da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31366
Resumo: The main objective of this study was to compare the goodness of fit of five non-linear growth models, i.e. Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards and von Bertalanffy in different animals. It also aimed to evaluate the influence of the shape parameter on the growth curve. To accomplish this task, published growth data of 14 different groups of animals were used and four goodness of fit statistics were adopted: coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). In general, the Richards growth equation provided better fits to experimental data than the other models. However, for some animals, different models exhibited better performance. It was obtained a possible interpretation for the shape parameter, in such a way that can provide useful insights to predict animal growth behavior.     Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
id UEM-7_a80983a883adb7e8c5d395ce5ba47d60
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/31366
network_acronym_str UEM-7
network_name_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animalsbody weight gainRichards modelgoodness of fitThe main objective of this study was to compare the goodness of fit of five non-linear growth models, i.e. Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards and von Bertalanffy in different animals. It also aimed to evaluate the influence of the shape parameter on the growth curve. To accomplish this task, published growth data of 14 different groups of animals were used and four goodness of fit statistics were adopted: coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). In general, the Richards growth equation provided better fits to experimental data than the other models. However, for some animals, different models exhibited better performance. It was obtained a possible interpretation for the shape parameter, in such a way that can provide useful insights to predict animal growth behavior.     Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animalsEditora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2017-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/3136610.4025/actascianimsci.v39i1.31366Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 39 No 1 (2017); 73-81Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 39 n. 1 (2017); 73-811807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31366/pdfCopyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciencesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeleken, Jhony TiagoGalvão, Alessandro CazonattoRobazza, Weber da Silva2022-02-20T21:50:00Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/31366Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2022-02-20T21:50Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
title Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
spellingShingle Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
Teleken, Jhony Tiago
body weight gain
Richards model
goodness of fit
title_short Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
title_full Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
title_fullStr Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
title_full_unstemmed Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
title_sort Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
author Teleken, Jhony Tiago
author_facet Teleken, Jhony Tiago
Galvão, Alessandro Cazonatto
Robazza, Weber da Silva
author_role author
author2 Galvão, Alessandro Cazonatto
Robazza, Weber da Silva
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teleken, Jhony Tiago
Galvão, Alessandro Cazonatto
Robazza, Weber da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv body weight gain
Richards model
goodness of fit
topic body weight gain
Richards model
goodness of fit
description The main objective of this study was to compare the goodness of fit of five non-linear growth models, i.e. Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, Richards and von Bertalanffy in different animals. It also aimed to evaluate the influence of the shape parameter on the growth curve. To accomplish this task, published growth data of 14 different groups of animals were used and four goodness of fit statistics were adopted: coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). In general, the Richards growth equation provided better fits to experimental data than the other models. However, for some animals, different models exhibited better performance. It was obtained a possible interpretation for the shape parameter, in such a way that can provide useful insights to predict animal growth behavior.     Comparing non-linear mathematical models to describe growth of different animals
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-02-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31366
10.4025/actascianimsci.v39i1.31366
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31366
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/actascianimsci.v39i1.31366
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/31366/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 39 No 1 (2017); 73-81
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 39 n. 1 (2017); 73-81
1807-8672
1806-2636
reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
collection Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com
_version_ 1799315361726726144