Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
DOI: | 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5782 |
Resumo: | The main objective was to study the effect of dry matter content, the addition of bacterial inoculant and particle size reduction on Tanzania grass (Panicum maximum) silage on digestive parameters. Seven ruminally cannulated Nellore beef steers were randomly assigned to a 7 x 7 Latin Square design. Treatments were described as follows: T1: wet forage + small particle; T2: T1 + inoculant; T4: wilting + large particle; T3: T4 + inoculant; T6: wet forage + large particle; T5: T6 + inoculant; T7: T6 + ground pearl millet grain. The ruminal passage rate of solid (2.35% h-1) and liquid (3.17% h-1) phases were similar across treatments. The animal intake behavior was not significantly changed by treatments, averaging 293 (minutes d-1) and 68 (minutes DM kg-1) for time and rate of eating, respectively. For rumination and chewing, the mean values observed were 432 (minutes d-1), 102 (minutes DM kg-1) and 725 (minutes d-1), 170 (minutes DM kg-1), respectively. No significant differences were observed for the DM (61.40%), ADF (59.69%), CP (43.93%) and NDF (60.34%) digestibilities. The mean DM intake (1.1% BW) was not different among treatments. It was concluded that the strategies adopted during the ensiling of Tanzania grass did not result in significant changes on the parameters. |
id |
UEM-7_e32de712bc596c4e53e53a9a66897176 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/5782 |
network_acronym_str |
UEM-7 |
network_name_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
spelling |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782Comportamento ingestivo e digestão de nutrientes em bovinos de corte alimentados com silagem de capim - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782beef cattledigestibilityintakeinoculantbovinosdigestibilidadeingestãoinoculanteAvaliação de Alimentos para AnimaisThe main objective was to study the effect of dry matter content, the addition of bacterial inoculant and particle size reduction on Tanzania grass (Panicum maximum) silage on digestive parameters. Seven ruminally cannulated Nellore beef steers were randomly assigned to a 7 x 7 Latin Square design. Treatments were described as follows: T1: wet forage + small particle; T2: T1 + inoculant; T4: wilting + large particle; T3: T4 + inoculant; T6: wet forage + large particle; T5: T6 + inoculant; T7: T6 + ground pearl millet grain. The ruminal passage rate of solid (2.35% h-1) and liquid (3.17% h-1) phases were similar across treatments. The animal intake behavior was not significantly changed by treatments, averaging 293 (minutes d-1) and 68 (minutes DM kg-1) for time and rate of eating, respectively. For rumination and chewing, the mean values observed were 432 (minutes d-1), 102 (minutes DM kg-1) and 725 (minutes d-1), 170 (minutes DM kg-1), respectively. No significant differences were observed for the DM (61.40%), ADF (59.69%), CP (43.93%) and NDF (60.34%) digestibilities. The mean DM intake (1.1% BW) was not different among treatments. It was concluded that the strategies adopted during the ensiling of Tanzania grass did not result in significant changes on the parameters.Avaliou-se o efeito do teor de matéria seca, uso de inoculante bacteriano e a redução do tamanho de partículas da silagem de capim-Tanzânia (Panicum maximum), sobre os parâmetros digestivos. Utilizaram-se sete novilhos da raça Nelore, em delineamento experimental Quadrado Latino 7 x 7. Os tratamentos foram: T1: Umidade original, partícula menor, sem inoculante bacteriano; T2: Umidade original, partícula menor, com inoculante bacteriano; T3: Emurchecido, partícula maior, com inoculante bacteriano; T4: Emurchecido, partícula maior, sem inoculante bacteriano; T5: Umidade original, partícula maior, com inoculante bacteriano; T6: Umidade original, partícula maior, sem inoculante bacteriano; T7: Umidade original, partícula maior, sem inoculante bacteriano, com milheto. Os tratamentos não influenciaram as taxas de passagem de sólidos (2,4% hora-1) e de líquidos (3,2% hora-1), o consumo de matéria seca (1,1% do PV) e nem o comportamento ingestivo. Observaram-se os seguintes tempos (minutos dia-1) e taxas (min kg MS-1) de ingestão de MS (293 e 68); de ruminação (432 e 102) e de mastigação (725 e 170), respectivamente. Os valores médios de digestibilidade da MS (61,4%), FDA (59,7%), PB (43,9%) e FDN (60,3%) não diferiram entre os tratamentos. Os procedimentos adotados na ensilagem não resultaram em alterações significativas nos parâmetros avaliados.Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá2009-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionDigestibilidadeapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/578210.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 31 No 4 (2009); 373-380Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 31 n. 4 (2009); 373-3801807-86721806-2636reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMporhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5782/5782Paziani, Solidete de FátimaNussio, Luiz GustavoLoures, Daniele Rebouças SantanaSchmidt, PatrickZopollatto, MaityRibeiro, José Leonardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-05-17T13:04:07Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/5782Revistahttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSciPUBhttp://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/oaiactaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com1807-86721806-2636opendoar:2024-05-17T13:04:07Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 Comportamento ingestivo e digestão de nutrientes em bovinos de corte alimentados com silagem de capim - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
title |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
spellingShingle |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 Paziani, Solidete de Fátima beef cattle digestibility intake inoculant bovinos digestibilidade ingestão inoculante Avaliação de Alimentos para Animais Paziani, Solidete de Fátima beef cattle digestibility intake inoculant bovinos digestibilidade ingestão inoculante Avaliação de Alimentos para Animais |
title_short |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
title_full |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
title_fullStr |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
title_sort |
Intake behavior and nutrient digestion of beef cattle fed with grass silage - DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
author |
Paziani, Solidete de Fátima |
author_facet |
Paziani, Solidete de Fátima Paziani, Solidete de Fátima Nussio, Luiz Gustavo Loures, Daniele Rebouças Santana Schmidt, Patrick Zopollatto, Maity Ribeiro, José Leonardo Nussio, Luiz Gustavo Loures, Daniele Rebouças Santana Schmidt, Patrick Zopollatto, Maity Ribeiro, José Leonardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nussio, Luiz Gustavo Loures, Daniele Rebouças Santana Schmidt, Patrick Zopollatto, Maity Ribeiro, José Leonardo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paziani, Solidete de Fátima Nussio, Luiz Gustavo Loures, Daniele Rebouças Santana Schmidt, Patrick Zopollatto, Maity Ribeiro, José Leonardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
beef cattle digestibility intake inoculant bovinos digestibilidade ingestão inoculante Avaliação de Alimentos para Animais |
topic |
beef cattle digestibility intake inoculant bovinos digestibilidade ingestão inoculante Avaliação de Alimentos para Animais |
description |
The main objective was to study the effect of dry matter content, the addition of bacterial inoculant and particle size reduction on Tanzania grass (Panicum maximum) silage on digestive parameters. Seven ruminally cannulated Nellore beef steers were randomly assigned to a 7 x 7 Latin Square design. Treatments were described as follows: T1: wet forage + small particle; T2: T1 + inoculant; T4: wilting + large particle; T3: T4 + inoculant; T6: wet forage + large particle; T5: T6 + inoculant; T7: T6 + ground pearl millet grain. The ruminal passage rate of solid (2.35% h-1) and liquid (3.17% h-1) phases were similar across treatments. The animal intake behavior was not significantly changed by treatments, averaging 293 (minutes d-1) and 68 (minutes DM kg-1) for time and rate of eating, respectively. For rumination and chewing, the mean values observed were 432 (minutes d-1), 102 (minutes DM kg-1) and 725 (minutes d-1), 170 (minutes DM kg-1), respectively. No significant differences were observed for the DM (61.40%), ADF (59.69%), CP (43.93%) and NDF (60.34%) digestibilities. The mean DM intake (1.1% BW) was not different among treatments. It was concluded that the strategies adopted during the ensiling of Tanzania grass did not result in significant changes on the parameters. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-11-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Digestibilidade |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5782 10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
url |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5782 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/5782/5782 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; Vol 31 No 4 (2009); 373-380 Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences; v. 31 n. 4 (2009); 373-380 1807-8672 1806-2636 reponame:Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) instacron:UEM |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
instacron_str |
UEM |
institution |
UEM |
reponame_str |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
collection |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
actaanim@uem.br||actaanim@uem.br|| rev.acta@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822182860270862336 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.4025/actascianimsci.v31i4.5782 |