Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: D'Elia, Francesca
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Altavilla, Gaetano, Esposito, Giovanni, Aliberti, Sara, Raiola, Gaetano
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/60397
Resumo: The present study investigated the beneficial effects induced on dancers by the two types of stretching protocol: static and dynamic stretching, in order to elevate the aesthetics of the figures and body positions to the highest level.  The subjects were 20 young female dancers divided into two groups: Group DS (n=10), which performed dynamic stretching, and Group SS (n=10), a static stretching, both for six months.  A survey, with the aim of assessing perceptions about the benefits induced by the type of stretching performed, and a Sit and Reach Test were administered to the dancers to assess both qualitative and quantitative aspects of flexibility. An independent samples t-test was performed to assess the differences in flexibility between DS and SS group before and after six months, and a Fisher's exact test to analyse their perceptions on the benefits induced by two training protocols. Result was statistically significant after six months and four associations were found (P <0.05). Dynamic stretching brought greater benefits both qualitatively and quantitatively.  From the results of the study, it was possible to state that dancers in terms of induced benefits and satisfaction with the performance result achieved, preferred dynamic stretching.
id UEM-9_3d7450c838f60bba17b77aa311420606
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/60397
network_acronym_str UEM-9
network_name_str Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
repository_id_str
spelling Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspectsPercepções e benefícios do alongamento estático e dinâmico em dançarinos: aspectos qualitativos e quantitativosflexibilitydancestretchingperceptionsbenefitsflexibilidadedançaalongamentopercepçõesbenefíciosThe present study investigated the beneficial effects induced on dancers by the two types of stretching protocol: static and dynamic stretching, in order to elevate the aesthetics of the figures and body positions to the highest level.  The subjects were 20 young female dancers divided into two groups: Group DS (n=10), which performed dynamic stretching, and Group SS (n=10), a static stretching, both for six months.  A survey, with the aim of assessing perceptions about the benefits induced by the type of stretching performed, and a Sit and Reach Test were administered to the dancers to assess both qualitative and quantitative aspects of flexibility. An independent samples t-test was performed to assess the differences in flexibility between DS and SS group before and after six months, and a Fisher's exact test to analyse their perceptions on the benefits induced by two training protocols. Result was statistically significant after six months and four associations were found (P <0.05). Dynamic stretching brought greater benefits both qualitatively and quantitatively.  From the results of the study, it was possible to state that dancers in terms of induced benefits and satisfaction with the performance result achieved, preferred dynamic stretching.O presente estudo investigou os efeitos benéficos induzidos em dançarinos pelos dois tipos de protocolo de alongamento:: alongamento estático e dinâmico, a fim de elevar a estética das figuras e posições corporais ao mais alto nível. Os sujeitos foram 20 jovens bailarinas divididas em dois grupos: Grupo DS (n = 10), que realizou alongamento dinâmico, e Grupo SS (n = 10), alongamento estático, ambos por seis meses. Uma pesquisa, com o objetivo de avaliar as percepções sobre os benefícios induzidos pelo tipo de alongamento realizado, e um Teste Sentar e Alcançar, foram administrados às bailarinas para avaliar aspectos qualitativos e quantitativos da flexibilidade. Um teste t de amostras independentes foi realizado para avaliar as diferenças na flexibilidade entre os grupos DS e SS antes e depois de seis meses, e um teste exato de Fisher para analisar suas percepções sobre os benefícios induzidos por dois protocolos de treinamento. O resultado foi estatisticamente significativo após seis meses e quatro associações foram encontradas (P <0,05). O alongamento dinâmico trouxe maiores benefícios tanto qualitativa quanto quantitativamente. A partir dos resultados do estudo, foi possível afirmar que os bailarinos em termos de benefícios induzidos e satisfação com o resultado de desempenho alcançado, preferem o alongamento dinâmico.Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil2022-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/6039710.4025/jphyseduc.v33i1.3339Journal of Physical Education; Vol 33 No 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3339Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3339Journal of Physical Education; v. 33 n. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-33392448-2455reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)instacron:UEMenghttps://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/60397/751375154287Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Educationhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessD'Elia, Francesca Altavilla, Gaetano Esposito, GiovanniAliberti, SaraRaiola, Gaetano 2022-05-31T18:24:42Zoai:periodicos.uem.br/ojs:article/60397Revistahttp://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/indexPUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revdef@uem.br2448-24552448-2455opendoar:2022-05-31T18:24:42Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
Percepções e benefícios do alongamento estático e dinâmico em dançarinos: aspectos qualitativos e quantitativos
title Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
spellingShingle Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
D'Elia, Francesca
flexibility
dance
stretching
perceptions
benefits
flexibilidade
dança
alongamento
percepções
benefícios
title_short Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
title_full Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
title_fullStr Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
title_sort Perceptions and benefits of static and dynamic stretching in dancers: Qualitative and quantitative aspects
author D'Elia, Francesca
author_facet D'Elia, Francesca
Altavilla, Gaetano
Esposito, Giovanni
Aliberti, Sara
Raiola, Gaetano
author_role author
author2 Altavilla, Gaetano
Esposito, Giovanni
Aliberti, Sara
Raiola, Gaetano
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv D'Elia, Francesca
Altavilla, Gaetano
Esposito, Giovanni
Aliberti, Sara
Raiola, Gaetano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv flexibility
dance
stretching
perceptions
benefits
flexibilidade
dança
alongamento
percepções
benefícios
topic flexibility
dance
stretching
perceptions
benefits
flexibilidade
dança
alongamento
percepções
benefícios
description The present study investigated the beneficial effects induced on dancers by the two types of stretching protocol: static and dynamic stretching, in order to elevate the aesthetics of the figures and body positions to the highest level.  The subjects were 20 young female dancers divided into two groups: Group DS (n=10), which performed dynamic stretching, and Group SS (n=10), a static stretching, both for six months.  A survey, with the aim of assessing perceptions about the benefits induced by the type of stretching performed, and a Sit and Reach Test were administered to the dancers to assess both qualitative and quantitative aspects of flexibility. An independent samples t-test was performed to assess the differences in flexibility between DS and SS group before and after six months, and a Fisher's exact test to analyse their perceptions on the benefits induced by two training protocols. Result was statistically significant after six months and four associations were found (P <0.05). Dynamic stretching brought greater benefits both qualitatively and quantitatively.  From the results of the study, it was possible to state that dancers in terms of induced benefits and satisfaction with the performance result achieved, preferred dynamic stretching.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/60397
10.4025/jphyseduc.v33i1.3339
url https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/60397
identifier_str_mv 10.4025/jphyseduc.v33i1.3339
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/RevEducFis/article/view/60397/751375154287
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Education
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of Physical Education
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Department of Physical Education - State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá-PR, Brazil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Physical Education; Vol 33 No 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3339
Journal of Physical Education; Vol. 33 Núm. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3339
Journal of Physical Education; v. 33 n. 1 (2022): Journal of Physical Education; e-3339
2448-2455
reponame:Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron:UEM
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
instacron_str UEM
institution UEM
reponame_str Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
collection Journal of Physical Education (Maringá)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Physical Education (Maringá) - Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revdef@uem.br
_version_ 1754732546604662784