IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loureiro, Elisângela de Souza
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Pessoa, Luis Gustavo Amorim, Putrick, Thayla Christiane, Pantaleão, Ariane de Andréa, Dias, Pamella Mingotti
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Agricultura Neotropical
Texto Completo: https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/3597
Resumo: Compatibility studies are essential for the integration and simultaneous use of chemical and biological pest control methods since they are necessary for an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program. In this work, the aim was to evaluate the compatibility of insecticides used in soybean and cotton crops for pest control with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The in vitro inoculation technique was used with B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis var. aizawai, in culture medium containing the following insecticides: beta-cyfluthrin (Bulldock®), methomyl (Bazuka®), thiamethoxam + lambda-cialotrina (Engeo Pleno®), zeta-cypermethrin (Fury 200®), acetamiprid (Saurus®), bifenthrin + carbosulfano (Talisman®) and bifenthrin (Talstar®), in Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were taken to the B.O.D. (Biological Oxygen Demand), at a temperature of 30 ± 1 ºC, 70 ± 10% RH (relative humidity) and a photophase of 12 h, for 24 hours. Colony growth was measured, and Colony Forming Units (CFU) counted in the total area of the Petri dish. The product that allowed growth to be significantly equal to or higher than the control was established as compatible, and the one that did not allow growth or was significantly less than the control was incompatible. It was found that all insecticides were classified as incompatible with the bioinsecticide.
id UEMS_7726ebd6c1dc9b3c39b9dd53dc429776
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.uems.br:article/3597
network_acronym_str UEMS
network_name_str Revista de Agricultura Neotropical
repository_id_str
spelling IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WGCompatibility studies are essential for the integration and simultaneous use of chemical and biological pest control methods since they are necessary for an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program. In this work, the aim was to evaluate the compatibility of insecticides used in soybean and cotton crops for pest control with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The in vitro inoculation technique was used with B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis var. aizawai, in culture medium containing the following insecticides: beta-cyfluthrin (Bulldock®), methomyl (Bazuka®), thiamethoxam + lambda-cialotrina (Engeo Pleno®), zeta-cypermethrin (Fury 200®), acetamiprid (Saurus®), bifenthrin + carbosulfano (Talisman®) and bifenthrin (Talstar®), in Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were taken to the B.O.D. (Biological Oxygen Demand), at a temperature of 30 ± 1 ºC, 70 ± 10% RH (relative humidity) and a photophase of 12 h, for 24 hours. Colony growth was measured, and Colony Forming Units (CFU) counted in the total area of the Petri dish. The product that allowed growth to be significantly equal to or higher than the control was established as compatible, and the one that did not allow growth or was significantly less than the control was incompatible. It was found that all insecticides were classified as incompatible with the bioinsecticide.Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Cassilândia2020-04-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/359710.32404/rean.v7i1.3597Revista de Agricultura Neotropical; v. 7 n. 1 (2020): Revista de Agricultura Neotropical; 49-52REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020): REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; 49-522358-630310.32404/rean.v7i1reponame:Revista de Agricultura Neotropicalinstname:Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)instacron:UEMSenghttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/3597/3305Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICALinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoureiro, Elisângela de SouzaPessoa, Luis Gustavo AmorimPutrick, Thayla ChristianePantaleão, Ariane de AndréaDias, Pamella Mingotti2021-07-22T10:03:50Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.uems.br:article/3597Revistahttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineoPUBhttps://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/oaiagriculturaneotropical@uems.br || wellingthon.junnyor@uems.br2358-63032358-6303opendoar:2022-05-16T12:53:13.977456Revista de Agricultura Neotropical - Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
title IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
spellingShingle IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
Loureiro, Elisângela de Souza
title_short IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
title_full IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
title_fullStr IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
title_full_unstemmed IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
title_sort IN VITRO COMPATIBILITY BETWEEN INSECTICIDES AND THE COMMERCIAL BIOINSECTICIDE AGREE® WG
author Loureiro, Elisângela de Souza
author_facet Loureiro, Elisângela de Souza
Pessoa, Luis Gustavo Amorim
Putrick, Thayla Christiane
Pantaleão, Ariane de Andréa
Dias, Pamella Mingotti
author_role author
author2 Pessoa, Luis Gustavo Amorim
Putrick, Thayla Christiane
Pantaleão, Ariane de Andréa
Dias, Pamella Mingotti
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loureiro, Elisângela de Souza
Pessoa, Luis Gustavo Amorim
Putrick, Thayla Christiane
Pantaleão, Ariane de Andréa
Dias, Pamella Mingotti
description Compatibility studies are essential for the integration and simultaneous use of chemical and biological pest control methods since they are necessary for an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program. In this work, the aim was to evaluate the compatibility of insecticides used in soybean and cotton crops for pest control with Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The in vitro inoculation technique was used with B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki and B. thuringiensis var. aizawai, in culture medium containing the following insecticides: beta-cyfluthrin (Bulldock®), methomyl (Bazuka®), thiamethoxam + lambda-cialotrina (Engeo Pleno®), zeta-cypermethrin (Fury 200®), acetamiprid (Saurus®), bifenthrin + carbosulfano (Talisman®) and bifenthrin (Talstar®), in Petri dishes. The Petri dishes were taken to the B.O.D. (Biological Oxygen Demand), at a temperature of 30 ± 1 ºC, 70 ± 10% RH (relative humidity) and a photophase of 12 h, for 24 hours. Colony growth was measured, and Colony Forming Units (CFU) counted in the total area of the Petri dish. The product that allowed growth to be significantly equal to or higher than the control was established as compatible, and the one that did not allow growth or was significantly less than the control was incompatible. It was found that all insecticides were classified as incompatible with the bioinsecticide.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/3597
10.32404/rean.v7i1.3597
url https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/3597
identifier_str_mv 10.32404/rean.v7i1.3597
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicosonline.uems.br/index.php/agrineo/article/view/3597/3305
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Cassilândia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Unidade Universitária de Cassilândia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Agricultura Neotropical; v. 7 n. 1 (2020): Revista de Agricultura Neotropical; 49-52
REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020): REVISTA DE AGRICULTURA NEOTROPICAL; 49-52
2358-6303
10.32404/rean.v7i1
reponame:Revista de Agricultura Neotropical
instname:Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)
instacron:UEMS
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)
instacron_str UEMS
institution UEMS
reponame_str Revista de Agricultura Neotropical
collection Revista de Agricultura Neotropical
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Agricultura Neotropical - Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul (UEMS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv agriculturaneotropical@uems.br || wellingthon.junnyor@uems.br
_version_ 1797051251455688704