DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pitta, Rafael Gomiero
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alves, Fernando de Brito
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Argumenta (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009
Resumo: This article analyses an important case of the European Court of Human Rights revealing, in addition to its peculiarities from the perspective of human rights, procedural aspects of the European Court, similarities with procedures of domestic jurisdiction of the countries and more relevant procedural acts. In addition, the work shows the evolution of procedures from the time of the trial in 1981 to the present, highlighting the main procedural changes, the justification for them and the impact of the decisions before other human rights courts, especially the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Using an inductive methodology, the article aimed to describe in detail the Court's procedural functioning through a case study, exposing the main procedural phases and methodologies of judgment adopted by the Court from its establishment to the present. The research, although containing elements of material and international public law, primarily analyses procedural aspects that allow the reader to draw comparatives in the field of procedural law.
id UENP-1_b86dcbda3c2e816cefe4c2729058d2a3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1009
network_acronym_str UENP-1
network_name_str Argumenta (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVEEUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAWDireitoThis article analyses an important case of the European Court of Human Rights revealing, in addition to its peculiarities from the perspective of human rights, procedural aspects of the European Court, similarities with procedures of domestic jurisdiction of the countries and more relevant procedural acts. In addition, the work shows the evolution of procedures from the time of the trial in 1981 to the present, highlighting the main procedural changes, the justification for them and the impact of the decisions before other human rights courts, especially the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Using an inductive methodology, the article aimed to describe in detail the Court's procedural functioning through a case study, exposing the main procedural phases and methodologies of judgment adopted by the Court from its establishment to the present. The research, although containing elements of material and international public law, primarily analyses procedural aspects that allow the reader to draw comparatives in the field of procedural law.Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná2022-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/100910.35356/argumenta.v0i37.2656Argumenta Journal Law; n. 37 (2022): ARGUMENTA JOURNAL LAW; 17-382317-38821676-280010.35356/argumenta.v0i37reponame:Argumenta (Online)instname:UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)instacron:UENPporhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009/pdfCopyright (c) 2022 Argumenta Journal Lawinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPitta, Rafael GomieroAlves, Fernando de Brito2024-03-15T22:43:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1009Revistahttp://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/indexPUBhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/oai||mestrado.ccsa@uenp.edu.br2317-38821676-2800opendoar:2024-03-15T22:43:35Argumenta (Online) - UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
title DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
spellingShingle DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
Pitta, Rafael Gomiero
EUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAW
Direito
title_short DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
title_full DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
title_fullStr DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
title_full_unstemmed DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
title_sort DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
author Pitta, Rafael Gomiero
author_facet Pitta, Rafael Gomiero
Alves, Fernando de Brito
author_role author
author2 Alves, Fernando de Brito
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pitta, Rafael Gomiero
Alves, Fernando de Brito
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv EUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAW
Direito
topic EUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAW
Direito
description This article analyses an important case of the European Court of Human Rights revealing, in addition to its peculiarities from the perspective of human rights, procedural aspects of the European Court, similarities with procedures of domestic jurisdiction of the countries and more relevant procedural acts. In addition, the work shows the evolution of procedures from the time of the trial in 1981 to the present, highlighting the main procedural changes, the justification for them and the impact of the decisions before other human rights courts, especially the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Using an inductive methodology, the article aimed to describe in detail the Court's procedural functioning through a case study, exposing the main procedural phases and methodologies of judgment adopted by the Court from its establishment to the present. The research, although containing elements of material and international public law, primarily analyses procedural aspects that allow the reader to draw comparatives in the field of procedural law.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-05
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009
10.35356/argumenta.v0i37.2656
url https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009
identifier_str_mv 10.35356/argumenta.v0i37.2656
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumenta Journal Law
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Argumenta Journal Law
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Argumenta Journal Law; n. 37 (2022): ARGUMENTA JOURNAL LAW; 17-38
2317-3882
1676-2800
10.35356/argumenta.v0i37
reponame:Argumenta (Online)
instname:UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)
instacron:UENP
instname_str UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)
instacron_str UENP
institution UENP
reponame_str Argumenta (Online)
collection Argumenta (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Argumenta (Online) - UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||mestrado.ccsa@uenp.edu.br
_version_ 1799317443101851648