DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Argumenta (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009 |
Resumo: | This article analyses an important case of the European Court of Human Rights revealing, in addition to its peculiarities from the perspective of human rights, procedural aspects of the European Court, similarities with procedures of domestic jurisdiction of the countries and more relevant procedural acts. In addition, the work shows the evolution of procedures from the time of the trial in 1981 to the present, highlighting the main procedural changes, the justification for them and the impact of the decisions before other human rights courts, especially the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Using an inductive methodology, the article aimed to describe in detail the Court's procedural functioning through a case study, exposing the main procedural phases and methodologies of judgment adopted by the Court from its establishment to the present. The research, although containing elements of material and international public law, primarily analyses procedural aspects that allow the reader to draw comparatives in the field of procedural law. |
id |
UENP-1_b86dcbda3c2e816cefe4c2729058d2a3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1009 |
network_acronym_str |
UENP-1 |
network_name_str |
Argumenta (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVEEUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAWDireitoThis article analyses an important case of the European Court of Human Rights revealing, in addition to its peculiarities from the perspective of human rights, procedural aspects of the European Court, similarities with procedures of domestic jurisdiction of the countries and more relevant procedural acts. In addition, the work shows the evolution of procedures from the time of the trial in 1981 to the present, highlighting the main procedural changes, the justification for them and the impact of the decisions before other human rights courts, especially the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Using an inductive methodology, the article aimed to describe in detail the Court's procedural functioning through a case study, exposing the main procedural phases and methodologies of judgment adopted by the Court from its establishment to the present. The research, although containing elements of material and international public law, primarily analyses procedural aspects that allow the reader to draw comparatives in the field of procedural law.Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná2022-09-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/100910.35356/argumenta.v0i37.2656Argumenta Journal Law; n. 37 (2022): ARGUMENTA JOURNAL LAW; 17-382317-38821676-280010.35356/argumenta.v0i37reponame:Argumenta (Online)instname:UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)instacron:UENPporhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009/pdfCopyright (c) 2022 Argumenta Journal Lawinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPitta, Rafael GomieroAlves, Fernando de Brito2024-03-15T22:43:35Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1009Revistahttp://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/indexPUBhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/oai||mestrado.ccsa@uenp.edu.br2317-38821676-2800opendoar:2024-03-15T22:43:35Argumenta (Online) - UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
title |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
spellingShingle |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE Pitta, Rafael Gomiero EUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAW Direito |
title_short |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
title_full |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
title_fullStr |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
title_full_unstemmed |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
title_sort |
DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM: ANALYZING THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS FROM A PROCEDURAL PERSPECTIVE |
author |
Pitta, Rafael Gomiero |
author_facet |
Pitta, Rafael Gomiero Alves, Fernando de Brito |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves, Fernando de Brito |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pitta, Rafael Gomiero Alves, Fernando de Brito |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
EUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAW Direito |
topic |
EUROPEAN COURT. HUMAN RIGHTS. PROCEDURAL LAW Direito |
description |
This article analyses an important case of the European Court of Human Rights revealing, in addition to its peculiarities from the perspective of human rights, procedural aspects of the European Court, similarities with procedures of domestic jurisdiction of the countries and more relevant procedural acts. In addition, the work shows the evolution of procedures from the time of the trial in 1981 to the present, highlighting the main procedural changes, the justification for them and the impact of the decisions before other human rights courts, especially the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Using an inductive methodology, the article aimed to describe in detail the Court's procedural functioning through a case study, exposing the main procedural phases and methodologies of judgment adopted by the Court from its establishment to the present. The research, although containing elements of material and international public law, primarily analyses procedural aspects that allow the reader to draw comparatives in the field of procedural law. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-05 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009 10.35356/argumenta.v0i37.2656 |
url |
https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.35356/argumenta.v0i37.2656 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/argumenta/article/view/1009/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Argumenta Journal Law info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Argumenta Journal Law |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual do Norte do Paraná |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Argumenta Journal Law; n. 37 (2022): ARGUMENTA JOURNAL LAW; 17-38 2317-3882 1676-2800 10.35356/argumenta.v0i37 reponame:Argumenta (Online) instname:UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP) instacron:UENP |
instname_str |
UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP) |
instacron_str |
UENP |
institution |
UENP |
reponame_str |
Argumenta (Online) |
collection |
Argumenta (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Argumenta (Online) - UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||mestrado.ccsa@uenp.edu.br |
_version_ |
1799317443101851648 |