A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Garcia de Souza, Caroline
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Claraboia
Texto Completo: https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/article/view/130
Resumo: Abstract: This work presents a comparative analysis of W. G. Sebald’s book The Rings of Saturn (1998) and Grant Gee’s film Patience (After Sebald) [2012]. As Sabine Wilke (2012) points out, Sebald did not provide a genre designation for three of his prose works, which means that he did not consider them as novels. Mixing up fact and fiction, his stories blur the line between literature and history, and hence establish a new form of “literary historiography” (WOLFF, 2014, p. 50). This hybridity is also manifested in Gee’s production, and this work explores in what aspects the latter can be considered an essay film, through the observation of questions of authorship and spectatorial experience. It argues that the book and the film are both based on a very similar concept of identity, according to which the writer and/or filmmaker’s I is but a tissue of citations from other texts. Likewise, it analyzes Sebald’s process of spatialization of time through the work of memory, and how this process is reflected in Gee’s inherently geographical approach, which emphasizes place and the mapping of consciousness. Key-words: Comparative literature; Intermedial studies; W. G. Sebald
id UENP-2_867d5d874a68ba5e0b5373232d87fad8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/130
network_acronym_str UENP-2
network_name_str Claraboia
repository_id_str
spelling A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”Literatura comparadaEstudos intermidiáticosW. G. SebaldAbstract: This work presents a comparative analysis of W. G. Sebald’s book The Rings of Saturn (1998) and Grant Gee’s film Patience (After Sebald) [2012]. As Sabine Wilke (2012) points out, Sebald did not provide a genre designation for three of his prose works, which means that he did not consider them as novels. Mixing up fact and fiction, his stories blur the line between literature and history, and hence establish a new form of “literary historiography” (WOLFF, 2014, p. 50). This hybridity is also manifested in Gee’s production, and this work explores in what aspects the latter can be considered an essay film, through the observation of questions of authorship and spectatorial experience. It argues that the book and the film are both based on a very similar concept of identity, according to which the writer and/or filmmaker’s I is but a tissue of citations from other texts. Likewise, it analyzes Sebald’s process of spatialization of time through the work of memory, and how this process is reflected in Gee’s inherently geographical approach, which emphasizes place and the mapping of consciousness. Key-words: Comparative literature; Intermedial studies; W. G. SebaldClaraboia2018-01-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/article/view/130Claraboia; n. 9 (2018): literatura; 10-242357-9234reponame:Claraboiainstname:UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)instacron:UENPporhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/article/view/130/pdfCopyright (c) 2018 Claraboiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia de Souza, Caroline2022-08-12T17:35:47Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/130Revistahttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboiaPUBhttps://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/oai||claraboia@uenp.edu.br2357-92342357-9234opendoar:2022-08-12T17:35:47Claraboia - UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
title A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
spellingShingle A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
Garcia de Souza, Caroline
Literatura comparada
Estudos intermidiáticos
W. G. Sebald
title_short A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
title_full A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
title_fullStr A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
title_full_unstemmed A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
title_sort A comparative analysis of “The rings of Saturn” and “Patience (After Sebald)”
author Garcia de Souza, Caroline
author_facet Garcia de Souza, Caroline
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Garcia de Souza, Caroline
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Literatura comparada
Estudos intermidiáticos
W. G. Sebald
topic Literatura comparada
Estudos intermidiáticos
W. G. Sebald
description Abstract: This work presents a comparative analysis of W. G. Sebald’s book The Rings of Saturn (1998) and Grant Gee’s film Patience (After Sebald) [2012]. As Sabine Wilke (2012) points out, Sebald did not provide a genre designation for three of his prose works, which means that he did not consider them as novels. Mixing up fact and fiction, his stories blur the line between literature and history, and hence establish a new form of “literary historiography” (WOLFF, 2014, p. 50). This hybridity is also manifested in Gee’s production, and this work explores in what aspects the latter can be considered an essay film, through the observation of questions of authorship and spectatorial experience. It argues that the book and the film are both based on a very similar concept of identity, according to which the writer and/or filmmaker’s I is but a tissue of citations from other texts. Likewise, it analyzes Sebald’s process of spatialization of time through the work of memory, and how this process is reflected in Gee’s inherently geographical approach, which emphasizes place and the mapping of consciousness. Key-words: Comparative literature; Intermedial studies; W. G. Sebald
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/article/view/130
url https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/article/view/130
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.uenp.edu.br/index.php/claraboia/article/view/130/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Claraboia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Claraboia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Claraboia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Claraboia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Claraboia; n. 9 (2018): literatura; 10-24
2357-9234
reponame:Claraboia
instname:UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)
instacron:UENP
instname_str UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)
instacron_str UENP
institution UENP
reponame_str Claraboia
collection Claraboia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Claraboia - UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO NORTE DO PARANÁ (UENP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||claraboia@uenp.edu.br
_version_ 1799317422315929600