Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices. |
id |
UEPB-4_28beb4485cb5cf64ce96a6a420f4548b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/734 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPB-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo StudyEndodonticsMolarDental Pulp CavityRoot Canal TherapyObjective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2021-11-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0093Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e00931983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734/421Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarg, Amit Kumar Agrawal, NehaWadhwani, Kulwinder Kaur Tikku, Aseem Prakash 2021-11-15T22:41:30Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/734Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2021-11-15T22:41:30Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
title |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study Garg, Amit Kumar Endodontics Molar Dental Pulp Cavity Root Canal Therapy |
title_short |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
title_full |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
title_sort |
Comparison of Detection Rate of Root Canal Orifices of Maxillary First Molar Using Various Techniques: An in-vivo Study |
author |
Garg, Amit Kumar |
author_facet |
Garg, Amit Kumar Agrawal, Neha Wadhwani, Kulwinder Kaur Tikku, Aseem Prakash |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Agrawal, Neha Wadhwani, Kulwinder Kaur Tikku, Aseem Prakash |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garg, Amit Kumar Agrawal, Neha Wadhwani, Kulwinder Kaur Tikku, Aseem Prakash |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endodontics Molar Dental Pulp Cavity Root Canal Therapy |
topic |
Endodontics Molar Dental Pulp Cavity Root Canal Therapy |
description |
Objective: To compare the detection rate of root canal orifices of maxillary first molar by various techniques in the Indian population. Material and Methods: A total of 50 maxillary 1st molar cases were selected and sequentially divided into four groups: Group I: Naked eye; Group II: Surgical loupe; Group III: Surgical operating microscope; and Group IV: Fluorescein sodium dye. After access opening, the number of root canal orifices was detected in all cases with these methods. Results: By naked eye and surgical loupe, a total of 171 root canal orifices were detected, by a surgical operating microscope, 176, and by fluorescein sodium dye, 177 root canal orifices were detected. The detection rate of root canal orifices is as follows: Group I (96.61%) = Group II (96.61%) < Group III (99.44%) < Group IV (100%) and detection rate of MB-2 canal orifices Group I (40%) = Group II (40%) < Group III (50%) < Group IV (52%). No significant difference in the number of canal orifices detected could be seen for any of the comparisons. No significant difference was observed between the naked eye and surgical loupe techniques. Although the surgical operating microscope detected more root canal orifices, it did not have a significantly higher detection than the other two techniques. Conclusion: No significant difference was seen among various methods. However, the use of a surgical operating microscope and fluorescein sodium dye increased the detection rate of root canal orifices. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734 |
url |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/734/421 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0093 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e0093 1983-4632 1519-0501 reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) instacron:UEPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
instacron_str |
UEPB |
institution |
UEPB |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387862786244608 |