Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1587 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the microleakage at the junction between amalgam-composite resin restorations using different bonding systems. Material and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standard class II cavities were prepared on 40 human maxillary premolars. The axial and gingival floor depths of the cavities were 2 mm and 1 mm below (cementoenamel junction), respectively. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 10). In all groups, a layer of 1-mm thick amalgam was used as a coating for the initial part of the gingival floor. In group 1, no bonding system was used for amalgam restoration. In group 2, G-Premio Bond was applied. G-Premio bond + alloy primer and single bond + alloy primer were used in group 3 and group 4, respectively. The rest of the cavities in all groups were then repaired using FiltekZ250 composite. The samples were thermocycled at 500 rpm and immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours to allow dye penetration. Once cut, the samples were placed under a stereomicroscope (40X) to determine the microleakage rate. Data analysis was carried out using post-hoc and Chi-square tests (p<0.05). Results: The highest and lowest microleakage rate was related to groups 1 and 3, respectively. There was a significant difference between groups (1,2) and (1,3), and (1,4), and groups (2,3) (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of alloy primer and bonding could reduce the microleakage between the two restorations. |
id |
UEPB-4_4914a70adfa510eeb81347dda1e30327 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1587 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPB-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II CavitiesDental LeakageDental Restoration, PermanentDental AmalgamDental BondingObjective: To evaluate the microleakage at the junction between amalgam-composite resin restorations using different bonding systems. Material and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standard class II cavities were prepared on 40 human maxillary premolars. The axial and gingival floor depths of the cavities were 2 mm and 1 mm below (cementoenamel junction), respectively. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 10). In all groups, a layer of 1-mm thick amalgam was used as a coating for the initial part of the gingival floor. In group 1, no bonding system was used for amalgam restoration. In group 2, G-Premio Bond was applied. G-Premio bond + alloy primer and single bond + alloy primer were used in group 3 and group 4, respectively. The rest of the cavities in all groups were then repaired using FiltekZ250 composite. The samples were thermocycled at 500 rpm and immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours to allow dye penetration. Once cut, the samples were placed under a stereomicroscope (40X) to determine the microleakage rate. Data analysis was carried out using post-hoc and Chi-square tests (p<0.05). Results: The highest and lowest microleakage rate was related to groups 1 and 3, respectively. There was a significant difference between groups (1,2) and (1,3), and (1,4), and groups (2,3) (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of alloy primer and bonding could reduce the microleakage between the two restorations.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2022-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1587Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 22 (2022); e210148Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 22 (2022); e2101481983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1587/1168Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessZajkani, ElhamOmidi, FatemehTaromi, Zahra2022-11-13T13:00:33Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1587Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2022-11-13T13:00:33Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
title |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities Zajkani, Elham Dental Leakage Dental Restoration, Permanent Dental Amalgam Dental Bonding |
title_short |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
title_full |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Microleakage at the Junction Between Combined Amalgam/Composite Resin Restorations Using Different Bonding Systems in Class II Cavities |
author |
Zajkani, Elham |
author_facet |
Zajkani, Elham Omidi, Fatemeh Taromi, Zahra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Omidi, Fatemeh Taromi, Zahra |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zajkani, Elham Omidi, Fatemeh Taromi, Zahra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dental Leakage Dental Restoration, Permanent Dental Amalgam Dental Bonding |
topic |
Dental Leakage Dental Restoration, Permanent Dental Amalgam Dental Bonding |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the microleakage at the junction between amalgam-composite resin restorations using different bonding systems. Material and Methods: In this in-vitro study, standard class II cavities were prepared on 40 human maxillary premolars. The axial and gingival floor depths of the cavities were 2 mm and 1 mm below (cementoenamel junction), respectively. The samples were divided into 4 groups (n = 10). In all groups, a layer of 1-mm thick amalgam was used as a coating for the initial part of the gingival floor. In group 1, no bonding system was used for amalgam restoration. In group 2, G-Premio Bond was applied. G-Premio bond + alloy primer and single bond + alloy primer were used in group 3 and group 4, respectively. The rest of the cavities in all groups were then repaired using FiltekZ250 composite. The samples were thermocycled at 500 rpm and immersed in 1% methylene blue solution for 24 hours to allow dye penetration. Once cut, the samples were placed under a stereomicroscope (40X) to determine the microleakage rate. Data analysis was carried out using post-hoc and Chi-square tests (p<0.05). Results: The highest and lowest microleakage rate was related to groups 1 and 3, respectively. There was a significant difference between groups (1,2) and (1,3), and (1,4), and groups (2,3) (p<0.05). Conclusion: The use of alloy primer and bonding could reduce the microleakage between the two restorations. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1587 |
url |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1587 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1587/1168 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 22 (2022); e210148 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 22 (2022); e210148 1983-4632 1519-0501 reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) instacron:UEPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
instacron_str |
UEPB |
institution |
UEPB |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387863812800512 |