Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/746 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25–0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98–0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth. |
id |
UEPB-4_bbe5f1d1e7135213e19628a614b8e95e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/746 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPB-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisRoot Canal PreparationSystematic ReviewTooth, DeciduousObjective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25–0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98–0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2021-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/746Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0016Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e00161983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/746/433Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi da Rosa, Ricardo Abreu Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa 2021-11-16T16:36:59Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/746Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2021-11-16T16:36:59Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Root Canal Preparation Systematic Review Tooth, Deciduous |
title_short |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort |
Reciprocating and Rotatory NiTi Instruments Used for Root Canal Preparation of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
author |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert |
author_facet |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi da Rosa, Ricardo Abreu Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi da Rosa, Ricardo Abreu Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bonzanini, Laura Izabel Lampert Cavalheiro, Cleber Paradzinski Scherer, Maitê Munhoz Pedrotti, Djessica Bottezini, Paola Arosi da Rosa, Ricardo Abreu Casagrande, Luciano Lenzi, Tathiane Larissa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Root Canal Preparation Systematic Review Tooth, Deciduous |
topic |
Root Canal Preparation Systematic Review Tooth, Deciduous |
description |
Objective: To compare the root canal preparation of primary teeth with reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments. Material and Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, TRIP, Lilacs, Embase, and Scopus) were systematically searched until October 2020. In vitro studies comparing the cleaning ability, debris extrusion, file deformation, or working time of rotary and reciprocating NiTi instruments in primary teeth were evaluated. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model to calculate pooled mean differences between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering the outcomes: working time (minutes) and debris extrusion (milligrams). Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 at a significance level of 5%. Results: From 4,417 potentially relevant studies, 10 were included in the systematic review, and 8 considered in the meta-analyses. There was no significant difference between reciprocating and rotary NiTi instruments considering debris extrusion [3 data sets; effect size: -0.11 (-0.25–0.04); p=0.15] and working time [6 data sets; effect size: -0.37 (-0.98–0.24); p=0.24]. The heterogeneity found was moderate to high. The risk of bias was low in most studies (50.0% of all items across studies). Conclusion: There is no scientific evidence showing superiority of reciprocating or rotary NiTi instruments used for root canal preparation in primary teeth. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/746 |
url |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/746 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/746/433 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0016 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e0016 1983-4632 1519-0501 reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) instacron:UEPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
instacron_str |
UEPB |
institution |
UEPB |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387862808264704 |