Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/694 |
Resumo: | Objective: To compare and assess the primary and secondary closure techniques following extraction of impacted third molars for post-operative complications. Material and Methods: In total, 30 patients ranging between 18-30 years of age and of either sex who had bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were randomly selected. Split mouth study method was used so that the participants served as their own control. Group 1 consisted of primary closure of left mandibular impacted third molars and Group 2 consisted of secondary closure of right mandibular impacted third molars. Basement evaluations were recorded for each patient along with subjective and objective evaluations for postoperative 7 days. Data analysis was carried out by SPSS 17.0 software using Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and t-test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was assigned as statistically significant. Results: When compared to group 1, group 2 revealed statistically less pain and swelling following the secondary closure of wound from day 1 to 7. There was a significant improvement in mouth opening in Group 2 at day 1 (p=0.0005) and at day 7 (p=0.00001). Conclusion: Secondary wound closure after disimpaction of mandibular third molar results in better postoperative recovery than primary closure. |
id |
UEPB-4_cb644594578e3a757e512e63a650ddbb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/694 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPB-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth StudySurgery, OralPain, PostoperativeSuture TechniquesTrismusObjective: To compare and assess the primary and secondary closure techniques following extraction of impacted third molars for post-operative complications. Material and Methods: In total, 30 patients ranging between 18-30 years of age and of either sex who had bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were randomly selected. Split mouth study method was used so that the participants served as their own control. Group 1 consisted of primary closure of left mandibular impacted third molars and Group 2 consisted of secondary closure of right mandibular impacted third molars. Basement evaluations were recorded for each patient along with subjective and objective evaluations for postoperative 7 days. Data analysis was carried out by SPSS 17.0 software using Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and t-test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was assigned as statistically significant. Results: When compared to group 1, group 2 revealed statistically less pain and swelling following the secondary closure of wound from day 1 to 7. There was a significant improvement in mouth opening in Group 2 at day 1 (p=0.0005) and at day 7 (p=0.00001). Conclusion: Secondary wound closure after disimpaction of mandibular third molar results in better postoperative recovery than primary closure.EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA2021-11-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/694Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0227Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e02271983-46321519-0501reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)instacron:UEPBenghttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/694/387Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integradahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAggarwal, Vipin Umarani, Meenaxi Baliga, Shridhar D. Issrani, Rakhi Prabhu, Namdeo 2021-11-14T18:14:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/694Revistahttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/PUBhttps://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/oaipboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com1983-46321519-0501opendoar:2021-11-14T18:14:20Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
title |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
spellingShingle |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study Aggarwal, Vipin Surgery, Oral Pain, Postoperative Suture Techniques Trismus |
title_short |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_full |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_fullStr |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
title_sort |
Comparison Between Primary and Secondary Method of Closing Surgical Wound After Tooth Extraction: A Split-Mouth Study |
author |
Aggarwal, Vipin |
author_facet |
Aggarwal, Vipin Umarani, Meenaxi Baliga, Shridhar D. Issrani, Rakhi Prabhu, Namdeo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Umarani, Meenaxi Baliga, Shridhar D. Issrani, Rakhi Prabhu, Namdeo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Aggarwal, Vipin Umarani, Meenaxi Baliga, Shridhar D. Issrani, Rakhi Prabhu, Namdeo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Surgery, Oral Pain, Postoperative Suture Techniques Trismus |
topic |
Surgery, Oral Pain, Postoperative Suture Techniques Trismus |
description |
Objective: To compare and assess the primary and secondary closure techniques following extraction of impacted third molars for post-operative complications. Material and Methods: In total, 30 patients ranging between 18-30 years of age and of either sex who had bilaterally impacted mandibular third molars were randomly selected. Split mouth study method was used so that the participants served as their own control. Group 1 consisted of primary closure of left mandibular impacted third molars and Group 2 consisted of secondary closure of right mandibular impacted third molars. Basement evaluations were recorded for each patient along with subjective and objective evaluations for postoperative 7 days. Data analysis was carried out by SPSS 17.0 software using Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and t-test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was assigned as statistically significant. Results: When compared to group 1, group 2 revealed statistically less pain and swelling following the secondary closure of wound from day 1 to 7. There was a significant improvement in mouth opening in Group 2 at day 1 (p=0.0005) and at day 7 (p=0.00001). Conclusion: Secondary wound closure after disimpaction of mandibular third molar results in better postoperative recovery than primary closure. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/694 |
url |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/694 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/694/387 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUEPB - EDITORA DA UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DA PARAÍBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; Vol. 21 (2021); e0227 Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada; v. 21 (2021); e0227 1983-4632 1519-0501 reponame:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) instacron:UEPB |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
instacron_str |
UEPB |
institution |
UEPB |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada (Online) - Universidade Estadual da Paraíba (UEPB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pboci.editoria@gmail.com || alessandrouepb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803387862432874496 |