Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Práxis Educativa (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955
Resumo: The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs.
id UEPG-26_067722c7b0e6d409303e8b0b3c10ab7e
oai_identifier_str oai:uepg.br:article/21955
network_acronym_str UEPG-26
network_name_str Práxis Educativa (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?Revisión ética de la investigación con seres humanos en ciencias biomédicas y no biomédicas: ¿reduciendo la distancia entre "dos culturas" en Brasil?Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs.La regulación ética en la investigación con humanos en Brasil se centra en el Sistema de Comités de Ética en Investigación (CEP)/Comité Nacional de Ética en Investigación (CONEP). Aunque el foco está en la investigación biomédica, el Sistema incorpora la regulación ética de la investigación no biomédica. Sin embargo, existe un conflicto evidente entre estas dos culturas de investigación. A pesar de las directrices, este choque entre la cultura de la investigación con humanos en las áreas biomédicas y no biomédicas, especialmente en las ciencias humanas y sociales (CHS), ha alimentado discusiones que incluyen la separación de la investigación CHS de la supervisión del Sistema. Investigamos las percepciones de esta regulación entre los coordinadores de programas de posgrado en seis universidades públicas brasileñas. Identificamos una conciencia y voluntad de abordar la ética en la investigación con humanos. Paradójicamente, este debate conflictivo en curso parece acercar gradualmente estas dos culturas y propiciar transformaciones en la regulación ética de la investigación con humanos en Brasil. Palabras clave: Ética de la investigación. Investigación con humanos. Programas de postgrado.The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs.Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2023-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/2195510.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21955.073Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15Práxis Educativa; V. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15Práxis Educativa; v. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-151809-43091809-4031reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGengporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217862https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217996Copyright (c) 2023 Práxis Educativahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Karina de AlbuquerqueVasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos2024-01-12T15:57:28Zoai:uepg.br:article/21955Revistahttp://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativaPUBhttps://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/oaipraxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br1809-43091809-4031opendoar:2024-01-12T15:57:28Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
Revisión ética de la investigación con seres humanos en ciencias biomédicas y no biomédicas: ¿reduciendo la distancia entre "dos culturas" en Brasil?
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
title Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
spellingShingle Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque
title_short Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
title_full Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
title_fullStr Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
title_full_unstemmed Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
title_sort Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
author Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque
author_facet Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque
Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos
author_role author
author2 Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque
Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos
description The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955
10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21955.073
url https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955
identifier_str_mv 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21955.073
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217862
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217996
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Práxis Educativa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Práxis Educativa
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15
Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15
Práxis Educativa; V. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15
Práxis Educativa; v. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15
1809-4309
1809-4031
reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
instacron:UEPG
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
instacron_str UEPG
institution UEPG
reponame_str Práxis Educativa (Online)
collection Práxis Educativa (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv praxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br
_version_ 1799317616023568384