Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Práxis Educativa (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955 |
Resumo: | The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs. |
id |
UEPG-26_067722c7b0e6d409303e8b0b3c10ab7e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:uepg.br:article/21955 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPG-26 |
network_name_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?Revisión ética de la investigación con seres humanos en ciencias biomédicas y no biomédicas: ¿reduciendo la distancia entre "dos culturas" en Brasil?Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil?The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs.La regulación ética en la investigación con humanos en Brasil se centra en el Sistema de Comités de Ética en Investigación (CEP)/Comité Nacional de Ética en Investigación (CONEP). Aunque el foco está en la investigación biomédica, el Sistema incorpora la regulación ética de la investigación no biomédica. Sin embargo, existe un conflicto evidente entre estas dos culturas de investigación. A pesar de las directrices, este choque entre la cultura de la investigación con humanos en las áreas biomédicas y no biomédicas, especialmente en las ciencias humanas y sociales (CHS), ha alimentado discusiones que incluyen la separación de la investigación CHS de la supervisión del Sistema. Investigamos las percepciones de esta regulación entre los coordinadores de programas de posgrado en seis universidades públicas brasileñas. Identificamos una conciencia y voluntad de abordar la ética en la investigación con humanos. Paradójicamente, este debate conflictivo en curso parece acercar gradualmente estas dos culturas y propiciar transformaciones en la regulación ética de la investigación con humanos en Brasil. Palabras clave: Ética de la investigación. Investigación con humanos. Programas de postgrado.The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs.Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2023-08-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/2195510.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21955.073Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15Práxis Educativa; V. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15Práxis Educativa; v. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-151809-43091809-4031reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGengporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217862https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217996Copyright (c) 2023 Práxis Educativahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha, Karina de AlbuquerqueVasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos2024-01-12T15:57:28Zoai:uepg.br:article/21955Revistahttp://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativaPUBhttps://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/oaipraxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br1809-43091809-4031opendoar:2024-01-12T15:57:28Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? Revisión ética de la investigación con seres humanos en ciencias biomédicas y no biomédicas: ¿reduciendo la distancia entre "dos culturas" en Brasil? Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
title |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
spellingShingle |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque |
title_short |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
title_full |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
title_fullStr |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
title_sort |
Ethics review of research on humans in the biomedical and non-biomedical sciences: bridging "two cultures" in Brazil? |
author |
Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque |
author_facet |
Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Karina de Albuquerque Vasconcelos, Sonia Maria Ramos |
description |
The ethics regulation of human-subject research in Brazil is by the Research Ethics Committee (CEP)/National Commission of Research Ethics (CONEP) System. While primarily focusing on biomedical research, this System also oversees the ethics of non-biomedical research. However, a distinct clash between these two research cultures is evident in Brazil. Despite existing guidelines, the cultural clash between biomedical and the humanities and social sciences (HSS) research has fueled discussions that include separating HSS research from the oversight of the CEP/CONEP System. We investigated perceptions of this ethics regulatory framework, focusing on HSS. A survey was conducted among coordinators of HSS graduate programs in six Brazilian public universities. We found growing awareness of and willingness to address the ethical aspects of human-subject research. Paradoxically, the ongoing conflictual debate seems to be gradually bridging the gap between these two cultures and feeding transformative changes to ethics regulation in HSS human-subject research in Brazil. Keywords: Research ethics. Human-subject research. Graduate programs. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-08-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21955.073 |
url |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5212/PraxEduc.v.18.21955.073 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217862 https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/21955/209209217996 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Práxis Educativa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Práxis Educativa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15 Práxis Educativa; Vol. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15 Práxis Educativa; V. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15 Práxis Educativa; v. 18 (2023): Publicação contínua; 1-15 1809-4309 1809-4031 reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) instacron:UEPG |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
instacron_str |
UEPG |
institution |
UEPG |
reponame_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
collection |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
praxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br |
_version_ |
1799317616023568384 |