High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chagas, Ângela Both
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Luce, Maria Beatriz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Práxis Educativa (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653
Resumo: In this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field.  Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.
id UEPG-26_c09987acca0415a8395a1d115b068c29
oai_identifier_str oai:uepg.br:article/14653
network_acronym_str UEPG-26
network_name_str Práxis Educativa (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistancesReforma de la Educación Secundaria en el Estado de Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alineamientos y resistênciasReforma do Ensino Médio no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alinhamentos e resistênciasIn this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field.  Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.En este artículo, presentamos un análisis de la implementación inicial de la reforma de la Educación Secundaria (Ley Nº 13.415/2017) en la red estatal de Rio Grande do Sul, de septiembre de 2016 a diciembre de 2018. A partir del concepto de campo de Pierre Bourdieu (2004, 2011), buscamos comprender estrategias y posiciones de dos agentes en el campo educativo: la Secretaría de Educación y el Consejo Estatal de Educación. Por medio de análisis documental notamos alineamiento entre la Secretaría y las directrices del Ministerio de Educación, con reproducción de la concepción de educación vinculada a los intereses hegemónicos en el campo económico. Del Consejo, observamos resistencia, en primer lugar, por el rechazo de la Medida Provisoria Nº 746/2016 y, después de la sanción de la Ley, por resistencia dentro de la norma, haciendo el juego dentro del campo para minimizar los impactos a los estudiantes. Palabras clave: Reforma de la Educación Secundaria. Ley Nº 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.Neste artigo, apresentamos uma análise da implementação inicial da reforma do Ensino Médio (Lei Nº 13.415/2017) na rede estadual do Rio Grande do Sul, de setembro de 2016 a dezembro de 2018. A partir do conceito de campo de Pierre Bourdieu (2004, 2011), buscamos compreender estratégias e posições de dois agentes no campo educacional: a Secretaria Estadual da Educação e o Conselho Estadual de Educação. Por meio de análise documental, percebemos alinhamento da Secretaria às orientações do Ministério da Educação, com reprodução da concepção de educação vinculada aos interesses hegemônicos no campo econômico. Do Conselho, observamos resistência, em primeiro lugar, pela rejeição da Medida Provisória Nº 746/2016, e, após a sanção da Lei, por resistência dentro da norma, utilizando-se do jogo dentro do campo para minimizar os impactos aos estudantes. Palavras-chave: Reforma do Ensino Médio. Lei Nº 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2019-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/1465310.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.14653.022Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21Práxis Educativa; V. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21Práxis Educativa; v. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-211809-43091809-4031reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209212800https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209213269Copyright (c) 2019 Práxis Educativainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChagas, Ângela Both Luce, Maria Beatriz 2020-04-17T14:03:04Zoai:uepg.br:article/14653Revistahttp://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativaPUBhttps://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/oaipraxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br1809-43091809-4031opendoar:2020-04-17T14:03:04Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
Reforma de la Educación Secundaria en el Estado de Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alineamientos y resistências
Reforma do Ensino Médio no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alinhamentos e resistências
title High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
spellingShingle High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
Chagas, Ângela Both
title_short High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
title_full High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
title_fullStr High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
title_full_unstemmed High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
title_sort High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
author Chagas, Ângela Both
author_facet Chagas, Ângela Both
Luce, Maria Beatriz
author_role author
author2 Luce, Maria Beatriz
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chagas, Ângela Both
Luce, Maria Beatriz
description In this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field.  Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653
10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.14653.022
url https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653
identifier_str_mv 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.14653.022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209212800
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209213269
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Práxis Educativa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Práxis Educativa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21
Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21
Práxis Educativa; V. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21
Práxis Educativa; v. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21
1809-4309
1809-4031
reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)
instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
instacron:UEPG
instname_str Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
instacron_str UEPG
institution UEPG
reponame_str Práxis Educativa (Online)
collection Práxis Educativa (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv praxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br
_version_ 1799317613946339328