High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Práxis Educativa (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653 |
Resumo: | In this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field. Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul. |
id |
UEPG-26_c09987acca0415a8395a1d115b068c29 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:uepg.br:article/14653 |
network_acronym_str |
UEPG-26 |
network_name_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistancesReforma de la Educación Secundaria en el Estado de Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alineamientos y resistênciasReforma do Ensino Médio no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alinhamentos e resistênciasIn this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field. Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.En este artículo, presentamos un análisis de la implementación inicial de la reforma de la Educación Secundaria (Ley Nº 13.415/2017) en la red estatal de Rio Grande do Sul, de septiembre de 2016 a diciembre de 2018. A partir del concepto de campo de Pierre Bourdieu (2004, 2011), buscamos comprender estrategias y posiciones de dos agentes en el campo educativo: la Secretaría de Educación y el Consejo Estatal de Educación. Por medio de análisis documental notamos alineamiento entre la Secretaría y las directrices del Ministerio de Educación, con reproducción de la concepción de educación vinculada a los intereses hegemónicos en el campo económico. Del Consejo, observamos resistencia, en primer lugar, por el rechazo de la Medida Provisoria Nº 746/2016 y, después de la sanción de la Ley, por resistencia dentro de la norma, haciendo el juego dentro del campo para minimizar los impactos a los estudiantes. Palabras clave: Reforma de la Educación Secundaria. Ley Nº 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.Neste artigo, apresentamos uma análise da implementação inicial da reforma do Ensino Médio (Lei Nº 13.415/2017) na rede estadual do Rio Grande do Sul, de setembro de 2016 a dezembro de 2018. A partir do conceito de campo de Pierre Bourdieu (2004, 2011), buscamos compreender estratégias e posições de dois agentes no campo educacional: a Secretaria Estadual da Educação e o Conselho Estadual de Educação. Por meio de análise documental, percebemos alinhamento da Secretaria às orientações do Ministério da Educação, com reprodução da concepção de educação vinculada aos interesses hegemônicos no campo econômico. Do Conselho, observamos resistência, em primeiro lugar, pela rejeição da Medida Provisória Nº 746/2016, e, após a sanção da Lei, por resistência dentro da norma, utilizando-se do jogo dentro do campo para minimizar os impactos aos estudantes. Palavras-chave: Reforma do Ensino Médio. Lei Nº 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul.Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa2019-12-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/1465310.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.14653.022Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21Práxis Educativa; V. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21Práxis Educativa; v. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-211809-43091809-4031reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online)instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)instacron:UEPGporhttps://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209212800https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209213269Copyright (c) 2019 Práxis Educativainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChagas, Ângela Both Luce, Maria Beatriz 2020-04-17T14:03:04Zoai:uepg.br:article/14653Revistahttp://www.revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativaPUBhttps://revistas2.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/oaipraxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br1809-43091809-4031opendoar:2020-04-17T14:03:04Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances Reforma de la Educación Secundaria en el Estado de Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alineamientos y resistências Reforma do Ensino Médio no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil): alinhamentos e resistências |
title |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances |
spellingShingle |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances Chagas, Ângela Both |
title_short |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances |
title_full |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances |
title_fullStr |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances |
title_full_unstemmed |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances |
title_sort |
High school reform in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil): alignments and resistances |
author |
Chagas, Ângela Both |
author_facet |
Chagas, Ângela Both Luce, Maria Beatriz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luce, Maria Beatriz |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Chagas, Ângela Both Luce, Maria Beatriz |
description |
In this article, we present an analysis of the first steps on the implementation of the Brazilian High School reform (Law no. 13.415/2017) in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, between September 2016 and December 2018. Based on Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of field, we examined strategies and positions of two agents in the educational field: the State Department of Education and the State Council on Education. Through a document analysis we found the state Department aligned to the Ministry of Education guidelines, reproducing education concepts bound to hegemonic interests in the economic field. Whereas the state Council pursued a resistance strategy, initially rejecting the content of Provisional Measure no. 746/2016, but after it became law, by resisting within the norm, playing the game within the field to minimize its impacts on students. Keywords: High School reform. Law no. 13.415/2017. Rio Grande do Sul. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653 10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.14653.022 |
url |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5212/PraxEduc.v.15.14653.022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209212800 https://revistas.uepg.br/index.php/praxiseducativa/article/view/14653/209209213269 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Práxis Educativa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Práxis Educativa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21 Práxis Educativa; Vol. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21 Práxis Educativa; V. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21 Práxis Educativa; v. 15 (2020): Publicação contínua; 1-21 1809-4309 1809-4031 reponame:Práxis Educativa (Online) instname:Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) instacron:UEPG |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
instacron_str |
UEPG |
institution |
UEPG |
reponame_str |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
collection |
Práxis Educativa (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Práxis Educativa (Online) - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa (UEPG) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
praxiseducativa@uepg.br||praxiseducativa@uepg.br |
_version_ |
1799317613946339328 |