MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Matteucci, Giovanni
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582
Resumo: According to the European Parliament (12.9.2017) “Italy uses mediation at a rate six times higher than the rest of Europe”. Mandatory mediation was ruled in 2010 in Italy and came in force in 2011. Furious opposition by lawyers, benign neglect by judges. In 2013 the “Opt-Out” model was introduced. Results: year 2011 - 60,810 mediation proceedings, 9,912 agreements, 16% success rate. year 2018 - 151,923 mediation proceedings, 20,965 agreements, 14% success rate.20,965 is the highest number of agreements through mediation ever reached in Italy. If all parties were present and they decided to go beyond the first meeting, the success rate in 2018 was 45%.  Nevertheless, mediation is growing well below its potential: 3.220,928 new proceedings were filed in courts in 2018. The Italian judges con order the litigants to undergo a mediation (delegated mediation) (ex art. 5, c.2, D.Lgs. 28/2010) or / and make a solution proposal based on equity (ex art. 185-bis civil procedure code), which the parties are free to accept or refuse (not binding arbitration), in all subjects related to alienable civil rights. When compulsory mediation was ruled they looked at mediation with a "benign neglect”, but since 2015 it is thanks to the judiciary that the use of mediation has been increasing in Italy: mediation proceedings delegated by judges were 2% (of all incoming mediation procedures) in 2011, 10% in 2015, 11% in 2016, 13% in 2017, 15% in 2018
id UERJ-17_68b505afd3f26ffbdd133729417a6623
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/47582
network_acronym_str UERJ-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
repository_id_str
spelling MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019Alternative Dispute ResolutionMediationConciliationAgreementMediation proceed-ingMandatory mediationOp-outDelegated mediationMediatorCourtCivil trialJudi-cial proceedingArbitrationJudgeEuropean UnionmediaçãoAccording to the European Parliament (12.9.2017) “Italy uses mediation at a rate six times higher than the rest of Europe”. Mandatory mediation was ruled in 2010 in Italy and came in force in 2011. Furious opposition by lawyers, benign neglect by judges. In 2013 the “Opt-Out” model was introduced. Results: year 2011 - 60,810 mediation proceedings, 9,912 agreements, 16% success rate. year 2018 - 151,923 mediation proceedings, 20,965 agreements, 14% success rate.20,965 is the highest number of agreements through mediation ever reached in Italy. If all parties were present and they decided to go beyond the first meeting, the success rate in 2018 was 45%.  Nevertheless, mediation is growing well below its potential: 3.220,928 new proceedings were filed in courts in 2018. The Italian judges con order the litigants to undergo a mediation (delegated mediation) (ex art. 5, c.2, D.Lgs. 28/2010) or / and make a solution proposal based on equity (ex art. 185-bis civil procedure code), which the parties are free to accept or refuse (not binding arbitration), in all subjects related to alienable civil rights. When compulsory mediation was ruled they looked at mediation with a "benign neglect”, but since 2015 it is thanks to the judiciary that the use of mediation has been increasing in Italy: mediation proceedings delegated by judges were 2% (of all incoming mediation procedures) in 2011, 10% in 2015, 11% in 2016, 13% in 2017, 15% in 2018Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/4758210.12957/redp.2020.47582Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 21 NÚMERO 11982-7636reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processualinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582/31767Copyright (c) 2019 Giovanni Matteucciinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatteucci, Giovanni2019-12-30T18:23:44Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/47582Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redpPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/oai||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com1982-76361982-7636opendoar:2019-12-30T18:23:44Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
title MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
spellingShingle MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
Matteucci, Giovanni
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mediation
Conciliation
Agreement
Mediation proceed-ing
Mandatory mediation
Op-out
Delegated mediation
Mediator
Court
Civil trial
Judi-cial proceeding
Arbitration
Judge
European Union
mediação
title_short MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
title_full MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
title_fullStr MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
title_full_unstemmed MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
title_sort MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
author Matteucci, Giovanni
author_facet Matteucci, Giovanni
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Matteucci, Giovanni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mediation
Conciliation
Agreement
Mediation proceed-ing
Mandatory mediation
Op-out
Delegated mediation
Mediator
Court
Civil trial
Judi-cial proceeding
Arbitration
Judge
European Union
mediação
topic Alternative Dispute Resolution
Mediation
Conciliation
Agreement
Mediation proceed-ing
Mandatory mediation
Op-out
Delegated mediation
Mediator
Court
Civil trial
Judi-cial proceeding
Arbitration
Judge
European Union
mediação
description According to the European Parliament (12.9.2017) “Italy uses mediation at a rate six times higher than the rest of Europe”. Mandatory mediation was ruled in 2010 in Italy and came in force in 2011. Furious opposition by lawyers, benign neglect by judges. In 2013 the “Opt-Out” model was introduced. Results: year 2011 - 60,810 mediation proceedings, 9,912 agreements, 16% success rate. year 2018 - 151,923 mediation proceedings, 20,965 agreements, 14% success rate.20,965 is the highest number of agreements through mediation ever reached in Italy. If all parties were present and they decided to go beyond the first meeting, the success rate in 2018 was 45%.  Nevertheless, mediation is growing well below its potential: 3.220,928 new proceedings were filed in courts in 2018. The Italian judges con order the litigants to undergo a mediation (delegated mediation) (ex art. 5, c.2, D.Lgs. 28/2010) or / and make a solution proposal based on equity (ex art. 185-bis civil procedure code), which the parties are free to accept or refuse (not binding arbitration), in all subjects related to alienable civil rights. When compulsory mediation was ruled they looked at mediation with a "benign neglect”, but since 2015 it is thanks to the judiciary that the use of mediation has been increasing in Italy: mediation proceedings delegated by judges were 2% (of all incoming mediation procedures) in 2011, 10% in 2015, 11% in 2016, 13% in 2017, 15% in 2018
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582
10.12957/redp.2020.47582
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582
identifier_str_mv 10.12957/redp.2020.47582
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582/31767
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Giovanni Matteucci
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Giovanni Matteucci
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 21 NÚMERO 1
1982-7636
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
collection Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com
_version_ 1799317666241970176