MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582 |
Resumo: | According to the European Parliament (12.9.2017) “Italy uses mediation at a rate six times higher than the rest of Europe”. Mandatory mediation was ruled in 2010 in Italy and came in force in 2011. Furious opposition by lawyers, benign neglect by judges. In 2013 the “Opt-Out” model was introduced. Results: year 2011 - 60,810 mediation proceedings, 9,912 agreements, 16% success rate. year 2018 - 151,923 mediation proceedings, 20,965 agreements, 14% success rate.20,965 is the highest number of agreements through mediation ever reached in Italy. If all parties were present and they decided to go beyond the first meeting, the success rate in 2018 was 45%. Nevertheless, mediation is growing well below its potential: 3.220,928 new proceedings were filed in courts in 2018. The Italian judges con order the litigants to undergo a mediation (delegated mediation) (ex art. 5, c.2, D.Lgs. 28/2010) or / and make a solution proposal based on equity (ex art. 185-bis civil procedure code), which the parties are free to accept or refuse (not binding arbitration), in all subjects related to alienable civil rights. When compulsory mediation was ruled they looked at mediation with a "benign neglect”, but since 2015 it is thanks to the judiciary that the use of mediation has been increasing in Italy: mediation proceedings delegated by judges were 2% (of all incoming mediation procedures) in 2011, 10% in 2015, 11% in 2016, 13% in 2017, 15% in 2018 |
id |
UERJ-17_68b505afd3f26ffbdd133729417a6623 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/47582 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-17 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019Alternative Dispute ResolutionMediationConciliationAgreementMediation proceed-ingMandatory mediationOp-outDelegated mediationMediatorCourtCivil trialJudi-cial proceedingArbitrationJudgeEuropean UnionmediaçãoAccording to the European Parliament (12.9.2017) “Italy uses mediation at a rate six times higher than the rest of Europe”. Mandatory mediation was ruled in 2010 in Italy and came in force in 2011. Furious opposition by lawyers, benign neglect by judges. In 2013 the “Opt-Out” model was introduced. Results: year 2011 - 60,810 mediation proceedings, 9,912 agreements, 16% success rate. year 2018 - 151,923 mediation proceedings, 20,965 agreements, 14% success rate.20,965 is the highest number of agreements through mediation ever reached in Italy. If all parties were present and they decided to go beyond the first meeting, the success rate in 2018 was 45%. Nevertheless, mediation is growing well below its potential: 3.220,928 new proceedings were filed in courts in 2018. The Italian judges con order the litigants to undergo a mediation (delegated mediation) (ex art. 5, c.2, D.Lgs. 28/2010) or / and make a solution proposal based on equity (ex art. 185-bis civil procedure code), which the parties are free to accept or refuse (not binding arbitration), in all subjects related to alienable civil rights. When compulsory mediation was ruled they looked at mediation with a "benign neglect”, but since 2015 it is thanks to the judiciary that the use of mediation has been increasing in Italy: mediation proceedings delegated by judges were 2% (of all incoming mediation procedures) in 2011, 10% in 2015, 11% in 2016, 13% in 2017, 15% in 2018Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University2019-12-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/4758210.12957/redp.2020.47582Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 21 NÚMERO 11982-7636reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processualinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582/31767Copyright (c) 2019 Giovanni Matteucciinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMatteucci, Giovanni2019-12-30T18:23:44Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/47582Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redpPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/oai||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com1982-76361982-7636opendoar:2019-12-30T18:23:44Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
title |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
spellingShingle |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 Matteucci, Giovanni Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation Conciliation Agreement Mediation proceed-ing Mandatory mediation Op-out Delegated mediation Mediator Court Civil trial Judi-cial proceeding Arbitration Judge European Union mediação |
title_short |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
title_full |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
title_fullStr |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
title_full_unstemmed |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
title_sort |
MEDIATION AND JUDICIARY IN ITALY 2019 |
author |
Matteucci, Giovanni |
author_facet |
Matteucci, Giovanni |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Matteucci, Giovanni |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation Conciliation Agreement Mediation proceed-ing Mandatory mediation Op-out Delegated mediation Mediator Court Civil trial Judi-cial proceeding Arbitration Judge European Union mediação |
topic |
Alternative Dispute Resolution Mediation Conciliation Agreement Mediation proceed-ing Mandatory mediation Op-out Delegated mediation Mediator Court Civil trial Judi-cial proceeding Arbitration Judge European Union mediação |
description |
According to the European Parliament (12.9.2017) “Italy uses mediation at a rate six times higher than the rest of Europe”. Mandatory mediation was ruled in 2010 in Italy and came in force in 2011. Furious opposition by lawyers, benign neglect by judges. In 2013 the “Opt-Out” model was introduced. Results: year 2011 - 60,810 mediation proceedings, 9,912 agreements, 16% success rate. year 2018 - 151,923 mediation proceedings, 20,965 agreements, 14% success rate.20,965 is the highest number of agreements through mediation ever reached in Italy. If all parties were present and they decided to go beyond the first meeting, the success rate in 2018 was 45%. Nevertheless, mediation is growing well below its potential: 3.220,928 new proceedings were filed in courts in 2018. The Italian judges con order the litigants to undergo a mediation (delegated mediation) (ex art. 5, c.2, D.Lgs. 28/2010) or / and make a solution proposal based on equity (ex art. 185-bis civil procedure code), which the parties are free to accept or refuse (not binding arbitration), in all subjects related to alienable civil rights. When compulsory mediation was ruled they looked at mediation with a "benign neglect”, but since 2015 it is thanks to the judiciary that the use of mediation has been increasing in Italy: mediation proceedings delegated by judges were 2% (of all incoming mediation procedures) in 2011, 10% in 2015, 11% in 2016, 13% in 2017, 15% in 2018 |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-12-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582 10.12957/redp.2020.47582 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12957/redp.2020.47582 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/47582/31767 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Giovanni Matteucci info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Giovanni Matteucci |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 21 n. 1 (2020): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 21 NÚMERO 1 1982-7636 reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799317666241970176 |