ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858 |
Resumo: | This essay offers a few remarks on arbitration in Italy where arbitration is still a niche alternative to traditional litigation before the courts. The initiatives taken by arbitral institutions in the face of the challenges to the proper functioning of the courts brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic have kindled new interest in arbitration, and further reforms of the Code of Civil Procedure (expected by the end of 2022) could increase the appeal of arbitration in Italy. The research methodology applied to this essay is the traditional doctrinal methodology aimed at identifying the relevant legal rules, discussing their meanings and the principles supporting them, without overlooking their ambiguities and flaws. Special attention is paid to a few new trends emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as to a set of forthcoming reforms that should improve the quality of Italian civil justice.In conclusion, some proposals are presented to make arbitration more attractive in Italy. Firstly, the time has come to get rid of the distinction that is only known in Italy and that causes a lot of confusion, between true arbitration (arbitrato rituale), governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and so-called "free arbitration" (arbitrato irrituale). Then, it is suggested the adoption of a fast-track arbitration, especially for the resolution of disputes in which the value at stake is modest and the legal issues in dispute are not highly complex. |
id |
UERJ-17_9abeccdcb03a2be9fb0ee994651f4f69 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/67858 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-17 |
network_name_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?ITÁLIA: UM PAÍS PARA ÁRBITROS?Arbitrationinstitutional arbitrationCode of Civil Proceduresimplified arbitrationduty of disclosureinterim measuresarbitragemArbitragemarbitragem institucionalcódigo de processo civilarbitragem simplificadadever de divulgaçãomedidas interinasThis essay offers a few remarks on arbitration in Italy where arbitration is still a niche alternative to traditional litigation before the courts. The initiatives taken by arbitral institutions in the face of the challenges to the proper functioning of the courts brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic have kindled new interest in arbitration, and further reforms of the Code of Civil Procedure (expected by the end of 2022) could increase the appeal of arbitration in Italy. The research methodology applied to this essay is the traditional doctrinal methodology aimed at identifying the relevant legal rules, discussing their meanings and the principles supporting them, without overlooking their ambiguities and flaws. Special attention is paid to a few new trends emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as to a set of forthcoming reforms that should improve the quality of Italian civil justice.In conclusion, some proposals are presented to make arbitration more attractive in Italy. Firstly, the time has come to get rid of the distinction that is only known in Italy and that causes a lot of confusion, between true arbitration (arbitrato rituale), governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and so-called "free arbitration" (arbitrato irrituale). Then, it is suggested the adoption of a fast-track arbitration, especially for the resolution of disputes in which the value at stake is modest and the legal issues in dispute are not highly complex.Este ensaio oferece algumas observações sobre a arbitragem na Itália, onde a arbitragem ainda é uma alternativa ao litígio tradicional perante os Tribunais. As iniciativas adotadas pelas instituições arbitrais diante dos desafios ao bom funcionamento decorrentes da pandemia de Covid-19 despertaram um novo interesse pela arbitragem e novas reformas ao Código de Processo Civil (previstas para o final de 2022 ) poderiam aumentar a utilização da arbitragem na Itália. A metodologia de pesquisa aplicada a este ensaio é a doutrinária tradicional que visa a identificar as normas jurídicas pertinentes, discutindo seus significados e os princípios que as sustentam, sem deixar de lado suas ambiguidades e falhas. Atenção especial é dada a algumas novas tendências surgidas durante a pandemia de Covid19, bem como a um conjunto de reformas futuras que devem melhorar a qualidade da justiça civil italiana.Na conclusão são apresentadas algumas propostas para tornar a arbitragem mais atrativa na Itália. Em primeiro lugar, chegou a hora de se livrar da distinção que só é conhecida na Itália e que causa muita confusão, entre a arbitragem verdadeira (arbitrato rituale), regida pelo Código de Processo Civil e a chamada "arbitragem livre" (arbitrato irrituale). Em seguida, é sugerida a adoção de uma modalidade de arbitragem, sob um rito mais célere, sobretudo para a resolução de disputas em que o valor em jogo seja modesto e as questões jurídicas em controvérsia não sejam altamente complexas.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University2022-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/6785810.12957/redp.2022.67858Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 23 n. 2 (2022): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 23, NÚMERO 21982-7636reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processualinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858/42350Copyright (c) 2022 Elisabetta Silvestriinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilvestri, Elisabetta2022-07-05T21:31:14Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/67858Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redpPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/oai||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com1982-76361982-7636opendoar:2022-07-05T21:31:14Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? ITÁLIA: UM PAÍS PARA ÁRBITROS? |
title |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? |
spellingShingle |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? Silvestri, Elisabetta Arbitration institutional arbitration Code of Civil Procedure simplified arbitration duty of disclosure interim measures arbitragem Arbitragem arbitragem institucional código de processo civil arbitragem simplificada dever de divulgação medidas interinas |
title_short |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? |
title_full |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? |
title_fullStr |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? |
title_full_unstemmed |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? |
title_sort |
ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS? |
author |
Silvestri, Elisabetta |
author_facet |
Silvestri, Elisabetta |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silvestri, Elisabetta |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Arbitration institutional arbitration Code of Civil Procedure simplified arbitration duty of disclosure interim measures arbitragem Arbitragem arbitragem institucional código de processo civil arbitragem simplificada dever de divulgação medidas interinas |
topic |
Arbitration institutional arbitration Code of Civil Procedure simplified arbitration duty of disclosure interim measures arbitragem Arbitragem arbitragem institucional código de processo civil arbitragem simplificada dever de divulgação medidas interinas |
description |
This essay offers a few remarks on arbitration in Italy where arbitration is still a niche alternative to traditional litigation before the courts. The initiatives taken by arbitral institutions in the face of the challenges to the proper functioning of the courts brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic have kindled new interest in arbitration, and further reforms of the Code of Civil Procedure (expected by the end of 2022) could increase the appeal of arbitration in Italy. The research methodology applied to this essay is the traditional doctrinal methodology aimed at identifying the relevant legal rules, discussing their meanings and the principles supporting them, without overlooking their ambiguities and flaws. Special attention is paid to a few new trends emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as to a set of forthcoming reforms that should improve the quality of Italian civil justice.In conclusion, some proposals are presented to make arbitration more attractive in Italy. Firstly, the time has come to get rid of the distinction that is only known in Italy and that causes a lot of confusion, between true arbitration (arbitrato rituale), governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and so-called "free arbitration" (arbitrato irrituale). Then, it is suggested the adoption of a fast-track arbitration, especially for the resolution of disputes in which the value at stake is modest and the legal issues in dispute are not highly complex. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858 10.12957/redp.2022.67858 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12957/redp.2022.67858 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858/42350 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Elisabetta Silvestri info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Elisabetta Silvestri |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 23 n. 2 (2022): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 23, NÚMERO 2 1982-7636 reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
collection |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799317667795959808 |