ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silvestri, Elisabetta
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858
Resumo: This essay offers a few remarks on arbitration in Italy where arbitration is still a niche alternative to traditional litigation before the courts. The initiatives taken by arbitral institutions in the face of the challenges to the proper functioning of the courts brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic have kindled new interest in arbitration, and further reforms of the Code of Civil Procedure (expected by the end of 2022) could increase the appeal of arbitration in Italy. The research methodology applied to this essay is the traditional doctrinal methodology aimed at identifying the relevant legal rules, discussing their meanings and the principles supporting them, without overlooking their ambiguities and flaws. Special attention is paid to a few new trends emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as to a set of forthcoming reforms that should improve the quality of Italian civil justice.In conclusion, some proposals are presented to make arbitration more attractive in Italy. Firstly, the time has come to get rid of the distinction that is only known in Italy and that causes a lot of confusion, between true arbitration (arbitrato rituale), governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and so-called "free arbitration" (arbitrato irrituale). Then, it is suggested the adoption of a fast-track arbitration, especially for the resolution of disputes in which the value at stake is modest and the legal issues in dispute are not highly complex.
id UERJ-17_9abeccdcb03a2be9fb0ee994651f4f69
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/67858
network_acronym_str UERJ-17
network_name_str Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
repository_id_str
spelling ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?ITÁLIA: UM PAÍS PARA ÁRBITROS?Arbitrationinstitutional arbitrationCode of Civil Proceduresimplified arbitrationduty of disclosureinterim measuresarbitragemArbitragemarbitragem institucionalcódigo de processo civilarbitragem simplificadadever de divulgaçãomedidas interinasThis essay offers a few remarks on arbitration in Italy where arbitration is still a niche alternative to traditional litigation before the courts. The initiatives taken by arbitral institutions in the face of the challenges to the proper functioning of the courts brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic have kindled new interest in arbitration, and further reforms of the Code of Civil Procedure (expected by the end of 2022) could increase the appeal of arbitration in Italy. The research methodology applied to this essay is the traditional doctrinal methodology aimed at identifying the relevant legal rules, discussing their meanings and the principles supporting them, without overlooking their ambiguities and flaws. Special attention is paid to a few new trends emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as to a set of forthcoming reforms that should improve the quality of Italian civil justice.In conclusion, some proposals are presented to make arbitration more attractive in Italy. Firstly, the time has come to get rid of the distinction that is only known in Italy and that causes a lot of confusion, between true arbitration (arbitrato rituale), governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and so-called "free arbitration" (arbitrato irrituale). Then, it is suggested the adoption of a fast-track arbitration, especially for the resolution of disputes in which the value at stake is modest and the legal issues in dispute are not highly complex.Este ensaio oferece algumas observações sobre a arbitragem na Itália, onde a arbitragem ainda é uma alternativa ao litígio tradicional perante os Tribunais. As iniciativas adotadas pelas instituições arbitrais diante dos desafios ao bom funcionamento decorrentes da pandemia de Covid-19 despertaram um novo interesse pela arbitragem e novas reformas ao Código de Processo Civil (previstas para o final de 2022 ) poderiam aumentar a utilização da arbitragem na Itália. A metodologia de pesquisa aplicada a este ensaio é a doutrinária tradicional que visa a identificar as normas jurídicas pertinentes, discutindo seus significados e os princípios que as sustentam, sem deixar de lado suas ambiguidades e falhas. Atenção especial é dada a algumas novas tendências surgidas durante a pandemia de Covid19, bem como a um conjunto de reformas futuras que devem melhorar a qualidade da justiça civil italiana.Na conclusão são apresentadas algumas propostas para tornar a arbitragem mais atrativa na Itália. Em primeiro lugar, chegou a hora de se livrar da distinção que só é conhecida na Itália e que causa muita confusão, entre a arbitragem verdadeira (arbitrato rituale), regida pelo Código de Processo Civil e a chamada "arbitragem livre" (arbitrato irrituale). Em seguida, é sugerida a adoção de uma modalidade de arbitragem, sob um rito mais célere, sobretudo para a resolução de disputas em que o valor em jogo seja modesto e as questões jurídicas em controvérsia não sejam altamente complexas.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University2022-06-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/6785810.12957/redp.2022.67858Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 23 n. 2 (2022): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 23, NÚMERO 21982-7636reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processualinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858/42350Copyright (c) 2022 Elisabetta Silvestriinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilvestri, Elisabetta2022-07-05T21:31:14Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/67858Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redpPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/redp/oai||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com1982-76361982-7636opendoar:2022-07-05T21:31:14Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
ITÁLIA: UM PAÍS PARA ÁRBITROS?
title ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
spellingShingle ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
Silvestri, Elisabetta
Arbitration
institutional arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure
simplified arbitration
duty of disclosure
interim measures
arbitragem
Arbitragem
arbitragem institucional
código de processo civil
arbitragem simplificada
dever de divulgação
medidas interinas
title_short ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
title_full ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
title_fullStr ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
title_full_unstemmed ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
title_sort ITALY: NO COUNTRY FOR ARBITRATORS?
author Silvestri, Elisabetta
author_facet Silvestri, Elisabetta
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silvestri, Elisabetta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arbitration
institutional arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure
simplified arbitration
duty of disclosure
interim measures
arbitragem
Arbitragem
arbitragem institucional
código de processo civil
arbitragem simplificada
dever de divulgação
medidas interinas
topic Arbitration
institutional arbitration
Code of Civil Procedure
simplified arbitration
duty of disclosure
interim measures
arbitragem
Arbitragem
arbitragem institucional
código de processo civil
arbitragem simplificada
dever de divulgação
medidas interinas
description This essay offers a few remarks on arbitration in Italy where arbitration is still a niche alternative to traditional litigation before the courts. The initiatives taken by arbitral institutions in the face of the challenges to the proper functioning of the courts brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic have kindled new interest in arbitration, and further reforms of the Code of Civil Procedure (expected by the end of 2022) could increase the appeal of arbitration in Italy. The research methodology applied to this essay is the traditional doctrinal methodology aimed at identifying the relevant legal rules, discussing their meanings and the principles supporting them, without overlooking their ambiguities and flaws. Special attention is paid to a few new trends emerged during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as to a set of forthcoming reforms that should improve the quality of Italian civil justice.In conclusion, some proposals are presented to make arbitration more attractive in Italy. Firstly, the time has come to get rid of the distinction that is only known in Italy and that causes a lot of confusion, between true arbitration (arbitrato rituale), governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, and so-called "free arbitration" (arbitrato irrituale). Then, it is suggested the adoption of a fast-track arbitration, especially for the resolution of disputes in which the value at stake is modest and the legal issues in dispute are not highly complex.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-04
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858
10.12957/redp.2022.67858
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858
identifier_str_mv 10.12957/redp.2022.67858
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/redp/article/view/67858/42350
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Elisabetta Silvestri
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Elisabetta Silvestri
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro / Rio de Janeiro State University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual; v. 23 n. 2 (2022): REVISTA ELETRÔNICA DE DIREITO PROCESSUAL VOLUME 23, NÚMERO 2
1982-7636
reponame:Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
collection Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Eletrônica de Direito Processual - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sr3depext@gmail.com|| fhrevistaprocessual@gmail.com||humbertodalla@gmail.com
_version_ 1799317667795959808