just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/20709 |
Resumo: | Research has shown that “no use” drug education programs, with the objective of scaring or shaming youth into abstinence, have not been effective in addressing problematic substance use. The ineffectiveness of such scare tactic approaches has led program developers to focus on prevention and harm reduction associated with drug use, or in general, health literacy promotion. While significant ‘discussion-based’ drug education programs have been developed over the past decade and has encouraged students to be expressive and critical thinkers regarding drug use, their effective implementation has been a challenge. This paper introduces Engaged Philosophical Inquiry (EPI) as a pedagogical approach in order to promote drug literacy. The EPI approach is used both as the content and means of professional development for high school teachers to address the significant role of teachers in these programs. Its goal is to help teachers become aware of and re-evaluate their biases, beliefs and behaviors, before they are able to facilitate a non-stereotyped, open, and thoughtful discussion on drug use related topics. The overall idea of this paper is based on an in-progress research project sponsored by Mitacs organization. It discusses the significance of the project by first presenting the existing methods and theoretical approaches to drug education. On that basis, it shows how EPI can contribute to traditional drug education approaches. It then describes how the methodology and phases of the project are rooted in a dialogical process that aim for a close collaboration with teachers. |
id |
UERJ-22_90c61e39408f5eef46daa6f88dce78be |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/20709 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-22 |
network_name_str |
Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi)sólo di qué piensas realmente acerca de las drogas: concientización acerca de las drogas a través de la indagación filosófica comprometidaapenas diga o que realmente você pensa sobre drogas: cultivando a educação sobre drogas através da comunidade de investigação filosóficaPhilosophical inquirydrug education and drug literacyteacher training and professional developmentResearch has shown that “no use” drug education programs, with the objective of scaring or shaming youth into abstinence, have not been effective in addressing problematic substance use. The ineffectiveness of such scare tactic approaches has led program developers to focus on prevention and harm reduction associated with drug use, or in general, health literacy promotion. While significant ‘discussion-based’ drug education programs have been developed over the past decade and has encouraged students to be expressive and critical thinkers regarding drug use, their effective implementation has been a challenge. This paper introduces Engaged Philosophical Inquiry (EPI) as a pedagogical approach in order to promote drug literacy. The EPI approach is used both as the content and means of professional development for high school teachers to address the significant role of teachers in these programs. Its goal is to help teachers become aware of and re-evaluate their biases, beliefs and behaviors, before they are able to facilitate a non-stereotyped, open, and thoughtful discussion on drug use related topics. The overall idea of this paper is based on an in-progress research project sponsored by Mitacs organization. It discusses the significance of the project by first presenting the existing methods and theoretical approaches to drug education. On that basis, it shows how EPI can contribute to traditional drug education approaches. It then describes how the methodology and phases of the project are rooted in a dialogical process that aim for a close collaboration with teachers.La investigación ha mostrado que los programas educativos del tipo la droga “no sirve” cuyo objetivo es lograr la abstinencia, a través de asustar y avergonzar a los jóvenes, no ha sido efectivo en el tratamiento del uso de substancias peligrosas. La ineficacia de tal enfoque ha llevado a quienes desarrollan programas a centrarse en la prevención y reducción de daños asociados al consumo de drogas o en la promoción de la educación de la salud en general. Aunque los significativos programas educativos “basados en la discusión” sobre drogas han sido desarrollados durante la pasada década y han estimulado a los estudiante a ser pensadores expresivos y críticos respecto del uso de drogas, su aplicación ha sido un desafío. Este artículo presenta la Discusión Filosófica Comprometida como un enfoque pedagógico que promueve el conocimiento sobre las drogas. Este enfoque es utilizado tanto como contenido cuanto como medio para el desarrollo profesional de los profesores del secundario que asumen el importante papel de profesores en estos programas. Su objetivo es ayudar a los profesores a que tomen conciencia de sus prejuicios, creencias, hábitos y puedan re evaluarlos antes de ser capaces de facilitar una discusión no estereotipada, abierta y reflexiva sobre el tema en cuestión. La idea general de este artículo se basa en un proyecto de investigación en curso patrocinado por la organización MITACS. Se discute la importancia del proyecto presentando en primer ligar los métodos y enfoques teóricos existentes sobre el uso de drogas. Sobre esta base se muestra cómo la Discusión Filosófica Comprometida puede contribuir a los enfoques tradicionales sobre la enseñanza de drogas. A continuación se describe cómo la metodología y las fases del programa se basan en un proceso dialógico que apunta a una estrecha colaboración con los maestros.Pesquisas mostram que o programa educativo de prevenção ao uso de drogas, cujo objetivo é assustar ou inibir os jovens a fim de mantê-los na abstinência, não foi efetivo no que tange ao problema da toxicodependência. A ineficácia dessas táticas assustadoras de aproximação ao problema levou aos idealizadores do programa a focar na prevenção e na diminuição do prejuízo associados ao uso de drogas, ou, mais genericamente, na promoção de educação em saúde. Embora significativos programas educativos desenvolvidos nas últimas décadas tenham utilizado a metodologia do debate e, assim, encorajado os estudantes a se expressarem e a serem pensadores críticos em relação ao uso da droga, suas efetivas implementações têm sido um desafio. Esse artigo apresenta a Comunidade de Investigação Filosófica como uma aproximação pedagógica a fim de promover uma educação sobre drogas. Essa abordagem é usada tanto como conteúdo quanto como meios para o desenvolvimento profissional de professores do ensino médio a fim de que os professores assumam seus papéis significativos nesses programas. O objetivo central dessa abordagem é ajudar os professores a tomarem ciência e reavaliar seus preconceitos, suas crenças e comportamentos para que estejam preparados para facilitar uma discussão não estereotipada, senão aberta e reflexiva, sobre os temas relacionados ao uso de drogas. A ideia geral desse artigo está baseada num projeto de pesquisa em andamento financiado pela organização Mitacs. É discutido, aqui, a importância desse projeto primeiramente apresentando os métodos e as abordagens teóricas existentes na área. A partir de então, é mostrado como a Comunidade de Investigação Filosófica pode contribuir para a abordagem tradicional da educação sobre drogas. Finalmente, o artigo descreve como a metodologia e as fases do projetos estão ancoradas num processo dialógico que aspira a uma estreita colaboração com os professores.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2015-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/20709childhood & philosophy; Vol. 11 Núm. 22 (2015): jul./dic.; 361-376childhood & philosophy; v. 11 n. 22 (2015): jul./dez.; 361-376childhood & philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 22 (2015): july/dec.; 361-3761984-5987reponame:Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/20709/15035asgari, mahboubehweber, barbarainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-07-10T18:51:12Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/20709Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/childhoodPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/childhood/oaiwokohan@gmail.com || wokohan@gmail.com1984-59871984-5987opendoar:2018-07-10T18:51:12Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) sólo di qué piensas realmente acerca de las drogas: concientización acerca de las drogas a través de la indagación filosófica comprometida apenas diga o que realmente você pensa sobre drogas: cultivando a educação sobre drogas através da comunidade de investigação filosófica |
title |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) |
spellingShingle |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) asgari, mahboubeh Philosophical inquiry drug education and drug literacy teacher training and professional development |
title_short |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) |
title_full |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) |
title_fullStr |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) |
title_full_unstemmed |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) |
title_sort |
just say what you really think about drugs: cultivating drug literacy through engaged philosophical inquiry (epi) |
author |
asgari, mahboubeh |
author_facet |
asgari, mahboubeh weber, barbara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
weber, barbara |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
asgari, mahboubeh weber, barbara |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Philosophical inquiry drug education and drug literacy teacher training and professional development |
topic |
Philosophical inquiry drug education and drug literacy teacher training and professional development |
description |
Research has shown that “no use” drug education programs, with the objective of scaring or shaming youth into abstinence, have not been effective in addressing problematic substance use. The ineffectiveness of such scare tactic approaches has led program developers to focus on prevention and harm reduction associated with drug use, or in general, health literacy promotion. While significant ‘discussion-based’ drug education programs have been developed over the past decade and has encouraged students to be expressive and critical thinkers regarding drug use, their effective implementation has been a challenge. This paper introduces Engaged Philosophical Inquiry (EPI) as a pedagogical approach in order to promote drug literacy. The EPI approach is used both as the content and means of professional development for high school teachers to address the significant role of teachers in these programs. Its goal is to help teachers become aware of and re-evaluate their biases, beliefs and behaviors, before they are able to facilitate a non-stereotyped, open, and thoughtful discussion on drug use related topics. The overall idea of this paper is based on an in-progress research project sponsored by Mitacs organization. It discusses the significance of the project by first presenting the existing methods and theoretical approaches to drug education. On that basis, it shows how EPI can contribute to traditional drug education approaches. It then describes how the methodology and phases of the project are rooted in a dialogical process that aim for a close collaboration with teachers. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/20709 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/20709 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/childhood/article/view/20709/15035 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
childhood & philosophy; Vol. 11 Núm. 22 (2015): jul./dic.; 361-376 childhood & philosophy; v. 11 n. 22 (2015): jul./dez.; 361-376 childhood & philosophy; Vol. 11 No. 22 (2015): july/dec.; 361-376 1984-5987 reponame:Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
collection |
Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Childhood & Philosophy (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
wokohan@gmail.com || wokohan@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799317590940581888 |