Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos,Fabiano
Data de Publicação: 1999
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52581999000100006
Resumo: The article proposes a model to explain why members of Brazil’s Lower House transfer substantial legislative power to the president of the republic. Following a brief discussion of the related literature, the main approach to the phenomenon - the personal vote theory - is critiqued. The article contends that this theory is not applicable to the Brazilian case since the transfer of votes within the open-list system makes it hard for lawmakers to know who their constituency really is. In a proportional open-list system like Brazil’s, the only candidates elected are those who garner votes equal to or greater than an electoral quotient obtained by dividing the number of valid votes cast by the seats to be filled, whatever the votes obtained by other candidates on the same list. In other words, it is often the case that a given deputy is only elected thanks to the contribution of votes won by other candidates. The result is that a Brazilian deputy has no information regarding the preferences of his or her true constituency, and the president consequently becomes the intermediary in the lawmaker’s relationship with this constituency. The stance these legislators take regarding presidential policies sends out a message to their constituency about their work in the Chamber of Deputies. This likewise accounts for the importance that these lawmakers attribute to the Executive’s agenda-setting power.
id UERJ-23_44f02693f9a475ab44723bcf07d7c1f5
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0011-52581999000100006
network_acronym_str UERJ-23
network_name_str Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository_id_str
spelling Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasilelectoral systemlegislative behaviorBrazilian presidentialismThe article proposes a model to explain why members of Brazil’s Lower House transfer substantial legislative power to the president of the republic. Following a brief discussion of the related literature, the main approach to the phenomenon - the personal vote theory - is critiqued. The article contends that this theory is not applicable to the Brazilian case since the transfer of votes within the open-list system makes it hard for lawmakers to know who their constituency really is. In a proportional open-list system like Brazil’s, the only candidates elected are those who garner votes equal to or greater than an electoral quotient obtained by dividing the number of valid votes cast by the seats to be filled, whatever the votes obtained by other candidates on the same list. In other words, it is often the case that a given deputy is only elected thanks to the contribution of votes won by other candidates. The result is that a Brazilian deputy has no information regarding the preferences of his or her true constituency, and the president consequently becomes the intermediary in the lawmaker’s relationship with this constituency. The stance these legislators take regarding presidential policies sends out a message to their constituency about their work in the Chamber of Deputies. This likewise accounts for the importance that these lawmakers attribute to the Executive’s agenda-setting power.Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)1999-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52581999000100006Dados v.42 n.1 1999reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJ10.1590/S0011-52581999000100006info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSantos,Fabianopor1999-10-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0011-52581999000100006Revistahttp://dados.iesp.uerj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dados@iesp.uerj.br1678-45880011-5258opendoar:1999-10-18T00:00Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
title Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
spellingShingle Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
Santos,Fabiano
electoral system
legislative behavior
Brazilian presidentialism
title_short Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
title_full Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
title_fullStr Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
title_full_unstemmed Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
title_sort Instituições eleitorais e desempenho do presidencialismo no Brasil
author Santos,Fabiano
author_facet Santos,Fabiano
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos,Fabiano
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv electoral system
legislative behavior
Brazilian presidentialism
topic electoral system
legislative behavior
Brazilian presidentialism
description The article proposes a model to explain why members of Brazil’s Lower House transfer substantial legislative power to the president of the republic. Following a brief discussion of the related literature, the main approach to the phenomenon - the personal vote theory - is critiqued. The article contends that this theory is not applicable to the Brazilian case since the transfer of votes within the open-list system makes it hard for lawmakers to know who their constituency really is. In a proportional open-list system like Brazil’s, the only candidates elected are those who garner votes equal to or greater than an electoral quotient obtained by dividing the number of valid votes cast by the seats to be filled, whatever the votes obtained by other candidates on the same list. In other words, it is often the case that a given deputy is only elected thanks to the contribution of votes won by other candidates. The result is that a Brazilian deputy has no information regarding the preferences of his or her true constituency, and the president consequently becomes the intermediary in the lawmaker’s relationship with this constituency. The stance these legislators take regarding presidential policies sends out a message to their constituency about their work in the Chamber of Deputies. This likewise accounts for the importance that these lawmakers attribute to the Executive’s agenda-setting power.
publishDate 1999
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1999-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52581999000100006
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52581999000100006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0011-52581999000100006
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Dados v.42 n.1 1999
reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
collection Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||dados@iesp.uerj.br
_version_ 1750312647494991872