Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582021000300204 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT We provide the first replication study of political science research published in Brazil by attempting to replicate every quantitative article published in five major Brazilian journals between 2012 and 2016. We also tested whether replication rates varied between established fields, more traditional and where the use of quantitative data is more common, and emerging fields. Our results show that transparency and reproduction are still in a development stage in Brazilian Political Science. Of the 650 articles reviewed, we asked for data to 197 quantitative articles. From those, only 28% agreed to share datasets and computed codes. We were able to attempt a replication for only 14%, and successfully reproduce the results of less than 5%. We conclude by suggesting the adoption of transparency and replicability procedures that are standard in other scientific communities. |
id |
UERJ-23_c91b4255a994396fb300c50a29c6bedc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0011-52582021000300204 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-23 |
network_name_str |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First LookreplicationtransparencyreproductionBrazilian Political Sciencedata sharingABSTRACT We provide the first replication study of political science research published in Brazil by attempting to replicate every quantitative article published in five major Brazilian journals between 2012 and 2016. We also tested whether replication rates varied between established fields, more traditional and where the use of quantitative data is more common, and emerging fields. Our results show that transparency and reproduction are still in a development stage in Brazilian Political Science. Of the 650 articles reviewed, we asked for data to 197 quantitative articles. From those, only 28% agreed to share datasets and computed codes. We were able to attempt a replication for only 14%, and successfully reproduce the results of less than 5%. We conclude by suggesting the adoption of transparency and replicability procedures that are standard in other scientific communities.Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582021000300204Dados v.64 n.3 2021reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJ10.1590/dados.2021.64.3.242info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAvelino,GeorgeDesposato,ScottMardegan,Ivaneng2021-05-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0011-52582021000300204Revistahttp://dados.iesp.uerj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||dados@iesp.uerj.br1678-45880011-5258opendoar:2021-05-12T00:00Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
title |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
spellingShingle |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look Avelino,George replication transparency reproduction Brazilian Political Science data sharing |
title_short |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
title_full |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
title_fullStr |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
title_full_unstemmed |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
title_sort |
Transparency and Replication in Brazilian Political Science: A First Look |
author |
Avelino,George |
author_facet |
Avelino,George Desposato,Scott Mardegan,Ivan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Desposato,Scott Mardegan,Ivan |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Avelino,George Desposato,Scott Mardegan,Ivan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
replication transparency reproduction Brazilian Political Science data sharing |
topic |
replication transparency reproduction Brazilian Political Science data sharing |
description |
ABSTRACT We provide the first replication study of political science research published in Brazil by attempting to replicate every quantitative article published in five major Brazilian journals between 2012 and 2016. We also tested whether replication rates varied between established fields, more traditional and where the use of quantitative data is more common, and emerging fields. Our results show that transparency and reproduction are still in a development stage in Brazilian Political Science. Of the 650 articles reviewed, we asked for data to 197 quantitative articles. From those, only 28% agreed to share datasets and computed codes. We were able to attempt a replication for only 14%, and successfully reproduce the results of less than 5%. We conclude by suggesting the adoption of transparency and replicability procedures that are standard in other scientific communities. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582021000300204 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0011-52582021000300204 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/dados.2021.64.3.242 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos (IESP) da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Dados v.64 n.3 2021 reponame:Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
collection |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Dados - Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||dados@iesp.uerj.br |
_version_ |
1750312649813393408 |