Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito e Práxis
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400
Resumo: https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 Abstract This paper discusses the judicialization of the corporatist interests of Brazilian judges, as well as the amount of space their agenda has been able to garner in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) docket.  We base our work on judicial review cases from the period spanning 1978 – 2014, concentrating on those petitioned by judges and their professional associations.  Our aim is to identify the agenda of claims sent to the STF, analyzing the extent to which judges and their associations have used their own political power to i) guarantee and advance career interests and benefits; ii) ensure and expand their institutional power and iii) defend general interests (“the common good”). We also seek to identify patterns of STF response to judges’ demands, as compared to its response to claims made by other interest groups. The discussion falls within the arena of judicial behavior studies and draws from the field of the sociology of professions. Our major conclusion is that the Federal Supreme Court favored the deliberation of the judges’ career interests, thereby awarding greater priority to their claims, above those of any other organized interest group during the period we studied.   Keywords: Federal Supreme Court (STF); judges; professionalism; judicialization of corporatist interests.
id UERJ-2_710e40b130f20a33ce61c87bae833f8a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/65400
network_acronym_str UERJ-2
network_name_str Revista Direito e Práxis
repository_id_str
spelling Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativosJuízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativosFederal Supreme Court (STF)judgesprofessionalismjudicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)juízesprofissionalismojudicialização de interesses corporativos.Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)JuízesProfissionalismoJudicialização de interesses corporativoshttps://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 Abstract This paper discusses the judicialization of the corporatist interests of Brazilian judges, as well as the amount of space their agenda has been able to garner in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) docket.  We base our work on judicial review cases from the period spanning 1978 – 2014, concentrating on those petitioned by judges and their professional associations.  Our aim is to identify the agenda of claims sent to the STF, analyzing the extent to which judges and their associations have used their own political power to i) guarantee and advance career interests and benefits; ii) ensure and expand their institutional power and iii) defend general interests (“the common good”). We also seek to identify patterns of STF response to judges’ demands, as compared to its response to claims made by other interest groups. The discussion falls within the arena of judicial behavior studies and draws from the field of the sociology of professions. Our major conclusion is that the Federal Supreme Court favored the deliberation of the judges’ career interests, thereby awarding greater priority to their claims, above those of any other organized interest group during the period we studied.   Keywords: Federal Supreme Court (STF); judges; professionalism; judicialization of corporatist interests.https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 O artigo discute a judicialização dos interesses corporativos dos juízes brasileiros, bem como o espaço que essa agenda conquistou na pauta do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). Para isso, baseia-se em casos de revisão judicial decididos no período de 1978 a 2014. Nosso objetivo é identificar a pauta de reivindicações encaminhadas ao STF, analisando em que medida os juízes e suas associações profissionais têm usado seu próprio poder político para i) garantir e promover os interesses e benefícios da carreira; ii) assegurar e ampliar seu poder institucional e iii) defender interesses gerais (“o bem comum”). Buscamos também identificar os padrões de resposta do STF às demandas dos juízes, em comparação com sua resposta às reivindicações feitas por outros grupos de interesse. A discussão é feita no âmbito dos estudos do comportamento judicial, apoiada em estudos no campo da sociologia das profissões. A principal conclusão é que o Supremo Tribunal Federal atuou como espaço privilegiado para a deliberação dos interesses corporativos dos magistrados, respondendo de forma significativamente mais favorável aos pleitos dos magistrados do que de qualquer outro grupo de interesse organizado que acionou o tribunal no período. Palavras-chave: Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF); juízes; profissionalismo; judicialização de interesses corporativos.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2022-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317Revista Direito e Práxis; v. 14 n. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-23172179-8966reponame:Revista Direito e Práxisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400/45318Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Fabiana Luci de2023-12-06T12:49:34Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/65400Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/indexPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/oai||carolvestena@gmail.com|| jr-cunha@uol.com.br|| direitoepraxis@gmail.com2179-89662179-8966opendoar:2023-12-06T12:49:34Revista Direito e Práxis - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
title Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
spellingShingle Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
Federal Supreme Court (STF)
judges
professionalism
judicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)
juízes
profissionalismo
judicialização de interesses corporativos.
Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)
Juízes
Profissionalismo
Judicialização de interesses corporativos
title_short Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
title_full Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
title_fullStr Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
title_full_unstemmed Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
title_sort Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
author Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
author_facet Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Federal Supreme Court (STF)
judges
professionalism
judicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)
juízes
profissionalismo
judicialização de interesses corporativos.
Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)
Juízes
Profissionalismo
Judicialização de interesses corporativos
topic Federal Supreme Court (STF)
judges
professionalism
judicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)
juízes
profissionalismo
judicialização de interesses corporativos.
Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)
Juízes
Profissionalismo
Judicialização de interesses corporativos
description https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 Abstract This paper discusses the judicialization of the corporatist interests of Brazilian judges, as well as the amount of space their agenda has been able to garner in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) docket.  We base our work on judicial review cases from the period spanning 1978 – 2014, concentrating on those petitioned by judges and their professional associations.  Our aim is to identify the agenda of claims sent to the STF, analyzing the extent to which judges and their associations have used their own political power to i) guarantee and advance career interests and benefits; ii) ensure and expand their institutional power and iii) defend general interests (“the common good”). We also seek to identify patterns of STF response to judges’ demands, as compared to its response to claims made by other interest groups. The discussion falls within the arena of judicial behavior studies and draws from the field of the sociology of professions. Our major conclusion is that the Federal Supreme Court favored the deliberation of the judges’ career interests, thereby awarding greater priority to their claims, above those of any other organized interest group during the period we studied.   Keywords: Federal Supreme Court (STF); judges; professionalism; judicialization of corporatist interests.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400/45318
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxis
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317
Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317
Revista Direito e Práxis; v. 14 n. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317
2179-8966
reponame:Revista Direito e Práxis
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Direito e Práxis
collection Revista Direito e Práxis
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito e Práxis - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||carolvestena@gmail.com|| jr-cunha@uol.com.br|| direitoepraxis@gmail.com
_version_ 1799318391865999360