Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito e Práxis |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400 |
Resumo: | https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 Abstract This paper discusses the judicialization of the corporatist interests of Brazilian judges, as well as the amount of space their agenda has been able to garner in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) docket. We base our work on judicial review cases from the period spanning 1978 – 2014, concentrating on those petitioned by judges and their professional associations. Our aim is to identify the agenda of claims sent to the STF, analyzing the extent to which judges and their associations have used their own political power to i) guarantee and advance career interests and benefits; ii) ensure and expand their institutional power and iii) defend general interests (“the common good”). We also seek to identify patterns of STF response to judges’ demands, as compared to its response to claims made by other interest groups. The discussion falls within the arena of judicial behavior studies and draws from the field of the sociology of professions. Our major conclusion is that the Federal Supreme Court favored the deliberation of the judges’ career interests, thereby awarding greater priority to their claims, above those of any other organized interest group during the period we studied. Keywords: Federal Supreme Court (STF); judges; professionalism; judicialization of corporatist interests. |
id |
UERJ-2_710e40b130f20a33ce61c87bae833f8a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/65400 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito e Práxis |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativosJuízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativosFederal Supreme Court (STF)judgesprofessionalismjudicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)juízesprofissionalismojudicialização de interesses corporativos.Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF)JuízesProfissionalismoJudicialização de interesses corporativoshttps://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 Abstract This paper discusses the judicialization of the corporatist interests of Brazilian judges, as well as the amount of space their agenda has been able to garner in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) docket. We base our work on judicial review cases from the period spanning 1978 – 2014, concentrating on those petitioned by judges and their professional associations. Our aim is to identify the agenda of claims sent to the STF, analyzing the extent to which judges and their associations have used their own political power to i) guarantee and advance career interests and benefits; ii) ensure and expand their institutional power and iii) defend general interests (“the common good”). We also seek to identify patterns of STF response to judges’ demands, as compared to its response to claims made by other interest groups. The discussion falls within the arena of judicial behavior studies and draws from the field of the sociology of professions. Our major conclusion is that the Federal Supreme Court favored the deliberation of the judges’ career interests, thereby awarding greater priority to their claims, above those of any other organized interest group during the period we studied. Keywords: Federal Supreme Court (STF); judges; professionalism; judicialization of corporatist interests.https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 O artigo discute a judicialização dos interesses corporativos dos juízes brasileiros, bem como o espaço que essa agenda conquistou na pauta do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF). Para isso, baseia-se em casos de revisão judicial decididos no período de 1978 a 2014. Nosso objetivo é identificar a pauta de reivindicações encaminhadas ao STF, analisando em que medida os juízes e suas associações profissionais têm usado seu próprio poder político para i) garantir e promover os interesses e benefícios da carreira; ii) assegurar e ampliar seu poder institucional e iii) defender interesses gerais (“o bem comum”). Buscamos também identificar os padrões de resposta do STF às demandas dos juízes, em comparação com sua resposta às reivindicações feitas por outros grupos de interesse. A discussão é feita no âmbito dos estudos do comportamento judicial, apoiada em estudos no campo da sociologia das profissões. A principal conclusão é que o Supremo Tribunal Federal atuou como espaço privilegiado para a deliberação dos interesses corporativos dos magistrados, respondendo de forma significativamente mais favorável aos pleitos dos magistrados do que de qualquer outro grupo de interesse organizado que acionou o tribunal no período. Palavras-chave: Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF); juízes; profissionalismo; judicialização de interesses corporativos.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2022-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317Revista Direito e Práxis; v. 14 n. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-23172179-8966reponame:Revista Direito e Práxisinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400/45318Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxishttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Fabiana Luci de2023-12-06T12:49:34Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/65400Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/indexPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/revistaceaju/oai||carolvestena@gmail.com|| jr-cunha@uol.com.br|| direitoepraxis@gmail.com2179-89662179-8966opendoar:2023-12-06T12:49:34Revista Direito e Práxis - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
title |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de Federal Supreme Court (STF) judges professionalism judicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) juízes profissionalismo judicialização de interesses corporativos. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) Juízes Profissionalismo Judicialização de interesses corporativos |
title_short |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
title_full |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
title_sort |
Brazilian judges and the judicialization of corporatist interests / Juízes brasileiros e a judicialização de interesses corporativos |
author |
Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Fabiana Luci de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Federal Supreme Court (STF) judges professionalism judicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) juízes profissionalismo judicialização de interesses corporativos. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) Juízes Profissionalismo Judicialização de interesses corporativos |
topic |
Federal Supreme Court (STF) judges professionalism judicialization of corporatist demands / Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) juízes profissionalismo judicialização de interesses corporativos. Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) Juízes Profissionalismo Judicialização de interesses corporativos |
description |
https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65400 Abstract This paper discusses the judicialization of the corporatist interests of Brazilian judges, as well as the amount of space their agenda has been able to garner in the Federal Supreme Court (STF) docket. We base our work on judicial review cases from the period spanning 1978 – 2014, concentrating on those petitioned by judges and their professional associations. Our aim is to identify the agenda of claims sent to the STF, analyzing the extent to which judges and their associations have used their own political power to i) guarantee and advance career interests and benefits; ii) ensure and expand their institutional power and iii) defend general interests (“the common good”). We also seek to identify patterns of STF response to judges’ demands, as compared to its response to claims made by other interest groups. The discussion falls within the arena of judicial behavior studies and draws from the field of the sociology of professions. Our major conclusion is that the Federal Supreme Court favored the deliberation of the judges’ career interests, thereby awarding greater priority to their claims, above those of any other organized interest group during the period we studied. Keywords: Federal Supreme Court (STF); judges; professionalism; judicialization of corporatist interests. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/revistaceaju/article/view/65400/45318 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Direito e Práxis https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 Núm. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317 Direito e Práxis; Vol. 14 No. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317 Revista Direito e Práxis; v. 14 n. 4 (2023): REVISTA DIREITO E PRÁXIS; 2293-2317 2179-8966 reponame:Revista Direito e Práxis instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito e Práxis |
collection |
Revista Direito e Práxis |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito e Práxis - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||carolvestena@gmail.com|| jr-cunha@uol.com.br|| direitoepraxis@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799318391865999360 |