Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism'
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/64098 |
Resumo: | Decisionism is the structure of Schmitt's political and legal thought. Hence the famous figure of the exception. Hence, too, the central figure of the theistic sovereign. Our objective in this article is to analyze the assumptions of Schmitt's decisionism, showing how such assumptions are incompatible with immanence and, therefore, with democracy. We will then present some central features of a notion of democracy based on immanence, such as the end of the exception and the immanent sovereign. Methodologically, we will read Schmitt's writings in which the notion of decisionism is elaborated, in addition to prominent commentators who deal with the issue. |
id |
UERJ-8_71c1878aac3020f0e59409fe27b4b7b7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/64098 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-8 |
network_name_str |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism'KeywordsDecisionismexceptionsovereigndemocracyimmanenceDecisionism is the structure of Schmitt's political and legal thought. Hence the famous figure of the exception. Hence, too, the central figure of the theistic sovereign. Our objective in this article is to analyze the assumptions of Schmitt's decisionism, showing how such assumptions are incompatible with immanence and, therefore, with democracy. We will then present some central features of a notion of democracy based on immanence, such as the end of the exception and the immanent sovereign. Methodologically, we will read Schmitt's writings in which the notion of decisionism is elaborated, in addition to prominent commentators who deal with the issue.Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-12-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/6409810.12957/rqi.2021.64098REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 14 n. 04 (2021): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 14, N°04; 1667-16951516-03511807-8389reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJenghttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/64098/40184Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBenjamin, Cássio Corrêa2022-01-24T20:31:17Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/64098Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiurisPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiuris/oaidanielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com1516-03511516-0351opendoar:2022-01-24T20:31:17Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
title |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
spellingShingle |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' Benjamin, Cássio Corrêa Keywords Decisionism exception sovereign democracy immanence |
title_short |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
title_full |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
title_fullStr |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
title_full_unstemmed |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
title_sort |
Democracy, the immanent sovereign and the end of exception: a critique of Carl Schmitt’s decisionism' |
author |
Benjamin, Cássio Corrêa |
author_facet |
Benjamin, Cássio Corrêa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Benjamin, Cássio Corrêa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Keywords Decisionism exception sovereign democracy immanence |
topic |
Keywords Decisionism exception sovereign democracy immanence |
description |
Decisionism is the structure of Schmitt's political and legal thought. Hence the famous figure of the exception. Hence, too, the central figure of the theistic sovereign. Our objective in this article is to analyze the assumptions of Schmitt's decisionism, showing how such assumptions are incompatible with immanence and, therefore, with democracy. We will then present some central features of a notion of democracy based on immanence, such as the end of the exception and the immanent sovereign. Methodologically, we will read Schmitt's writings in which the notion of decisionism is elaborated, in addition to prominent commentators who deal with the issue. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-11 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/64098 10.12957/rqi.2021.64098 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/64098 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12957/rqi.2021.64098 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/64098/40184 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 14 n. 04 (2021): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 14, N°04; 1667-1695 1516-0351 1807-8389 reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
danielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799318560092192768 |