Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Belikova, Ksenia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963
Resumo: Objective: This article is aimed at outlining the approaches to the pre-trial (quasi-judicial) dispute settlement and the landmarks in the establishment and development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the BRICS countries in the form of voluntary pre-trial dispute settlement with an emphasis on constructing the system of alternative procedures. The relevance of such a study is determined by its complex nature, giving an understanding of the ADR development vector in the BRICS format, based on relatively new legislation, which was not adequately reflected in scientific books, articles, etc. in the previous period. Thus, the present study fills this gap.Method: Based on analytical reflections on information obtained from sources and literature indicated in the references, the article analyzes the provisions of normative acts and documents of the BRICS countries, creating patterns of ADR development and the potential for its use from the position of legal principles. Having characterized ADR in general, the author successively moves from the approaches of one country to those of another to clarify and outline general ideas in this field based on the foregoing information.Results: The author’s results are presented in a set of legal prescriptions and scientific provisions found in the current legislation with regard to the field of research, including from the perspective of contribution to the further improvement of the ADR concept in the BRICS.Contribution: The theoretical and practical significance of the results is defined by the fact that foreign readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information on the state of the legislation in the BRICS countries in the field under study, which in practical terms will favor understanding of the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements obtained by Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in this sphere in terms of their implications at the level of legislation. 
id UERJ-8_fe68e944870021d982ecd1b887fc9797
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/51963
network_acronym_str UERJ-8
network_name_str Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICSPre-trial dispute settlementquasi-judicial dispute settlementBRICSBrazilRussiaIndiaChinaSouth AfricaObjective: This article is aimed at outlining the approaches to the pre-trial (quasi-judicial) dispute settlement and the landmarks in the establishment and development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the BRICS countries in the form of voluntary pre-trial dispute settlement with an emphasis on constructing the system of alternative procedures. The relevance of such a study is determined by its complex nature, giving an understanding of the ADR development vector in the BRICS format, based on relatively new legislation, which was not adequately reflected in scientific books, articles, etc. in the previous period. Thus, the present study fills this gap.Method: Based on analytical reflections on information obtained from sources and literature indicated in the references, the article analyzes the provisions of normative acts and documents of the BRICS countries, creating patterns of ADR development and the potential for its use from the position of legal principles. Having characterized ADR in general, the author successively moves from the approaches of one country to those of another to clarify and outline general ideas in this field based on the foregoing information.Results: The author’s results are presented in a set of legal prescriptions and scientific provisions found in the current legislation with regard to the field of research, including from the perspective of contribution to the further improvement of the ADR concept in the BRICS.Contribution: The theoretical and practical significance of the results is defined by the fact that foreign readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information on the state of the legislation in the BRICS countries in the field under study, which in practical terms will favor understanding of the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements obtained by Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in this sphere in terms of their implications at the level of legislation. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2020-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/5196310.12957/rqi.2020.51963REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 13 n. 04 (2020): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 13, N°04; 1649-16711516-03511807-8389reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963/36650Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelikova, Ksenia2021-02-04T20:14:10Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/51963Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiurisPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiuris/oaidanielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com1516-03511516-0351opendoar:2021-02-04T20:14:10Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
title Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
spellingShingle Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
Belikova, Ksenia
Pre-trial dispute settlement
quasi-judicial dispute settlement
BRICS
Brazil
Russia
India
China
South Africa
title_short Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
title_full Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
title_fullStr Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
title_full_unstemmed Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
title_sort Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
author Belikova, Ksenia
author_facet Belikova, Ksenia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Belikova, Ksenia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pre-trial dispute settlement
quasi-judicial dispute settlement
BRICS
Brazil
Russia
India
China
South Africa
topic Pre-trial dispute settlement
quasi-judicial dispute settlement
BRICS
Brazil
Russia
India
China
South Africa
description Objective: This article is aimed at outlining the approaches to the pre-trial (quasi-judicial) dispute settlement and the landmarks in the establishment and development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the BRICS countries in the form of voluntary pre-trial dispute settlement with an emphasis on constructing the system of alternative procedures. The relevance of such a study is determined by its complex nature, giving an understanding of the ADR development vector in the BRICS format, based on relatively new legislation, which was not adequately reflected in scientific books, articles, etc. in the previous period. Thus, the present study fills this gap.Method: Based on analytical reflections on information obtained from sources and literature indicated in the references, the article analyzes the provisions of normative acts and documents of the BRICS countries, creating patterns of ADR development and the potential for its use from the position of legal principles. Having characterized ADR in general, the author successively moves from the approaches of one country to those of another to clarify and outline general ideas in this field based on the foregoing information.Results: The author’s results are presented in a set of legal prescriptions and scientific provisions found in the current legislation with regard to the field of research, including from the perspective of contribution to the further improvement of the ADR concept in the BRICS.Contribution: The theoretical and practical significance of the results is defined by the fact that foreign readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information on the state of the legislation in the BRICS countries in the field under study, which in practical terms will favor understanding of the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements obtained by Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in this sphere in terms of their implications at the level of legislation. 
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963
10.12957/rqi.2020.51963
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963
identifier_str_mv 10.12957/rqi.2020.51963
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963/36650
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 13 n. 04 (2020): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 13, N°04; 1649-1671
1516-0351
1807-8389
reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UERJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UERJ
institution UERJ
reponame_str Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
collection Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv danielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com
_version_ 1799318559442075648