Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963 |
Resumo: | Objective: This article is aimed at outlining the approaches to the pre-trial (quasi-judicial) dispute settlement and the landmarks in the establishment and development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the BRICS countries in the form of voluntary pre-trial dispute settlement with an emphasis on constructing the system of alternative procedures. The relevance of such a study is determined by its complex nature, giving an understanding of the ADR development vector in the BRICS format, based on relatively new legislation, which was not adequately reflected in scientific books, articles, etc. in the previous period. Thus, the present study fills this gap.Method: Based on analytical reflections on information obtained from sources and literature indicated in the references, the article analyzes the provisions of normative acts and documents of the BRICS countries, creating patterns of ADR development and the potential for its use from the position of legal principles. Having characterized ADR in general, the author successively moves from the approaches of one country to those of another to clarify and outline general ideas in this field based on the foregoing information.Results: The author’s results are presented in a set of legal prescriptions and scientific provisions found in the current legislation with regard to the field of research, including from the perspective of contribution to the further improvement of the ADR concept in the BRICS.Contribution: The theoretical and practical significance of the results is defined by the fact that foreign readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information on the state of the legislation in the BRICS countries in the field under study, which in practical terms will favor understanding of the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements obtained by Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in this sphere in terms of their implications at the level of legislation. |
id |
UERJ-8_fe68e944870021d982ecd1b887fc9797 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/51963 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ-8 |
network_name_str |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICSPre-trial dispute settlementquasi-judicial dispute settlementBRICSBrazilRussiaIndiaChinaSouth AfricaObjective: This article is aimed at outlining the approaches to the pre-trial (quasi-judicial) dispute settlement and the landmarks in the establishment and development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the BRICS countries in the form of voluntary pre-trial dispute settlement with an emphasis on constructing the system of alternative procedures. The relevance of such a study is determined by its complex nature, giving an understanding of the ADR development vector in the BRICS format, based on relatively new legislation, which was not adequately reflected in scientific books, articles, etc. in the previous period. Thus, the present study fills this gap.Method: Based on analytical reflections on information obtained from sources and literature indicated in the references, the article analyzes the provisions of normative acts and documents of the BRICS countries, creating patterns of ADR development and the potential for its use from the position of legal principles. Having characterized ADR in general, the author successively moves from the approaches of one country to those of another to clarify and outline general ideas in this field based on the foregoing information.Results: The author’s results are presented in a set of legal prescriptions and scientific provisions found in the current legislation with regard to the field of research, including from the perspective of contribution to the further improvement of the ADR concept in the BRICS.Contribution: The theoretical and practical significance of the results is defined by the fact that foreign readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information on the state of the legislation in the BRICS countries in the field under study, which in practical terms will favor understanding of the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements obtained by Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in this sphere in terms of their implications at the level of legislation. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2020-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/5196310.12957/rqi.2020.51963REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 13 n. 04 (2020): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 13, N°04; 1649-16711516-03511807-8389reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJporhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963/36650Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURISinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelikova, Ksenia2021-02-04T20:14:10Zoai:ojs.www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br:article/51963Revistahttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiurisPUBhttps://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/quaestioiuris/oaidanielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com1516-03511516-0351opendoar:2021-02-04T20:14:10Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
title |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
spellingShingle |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS Belikova, Ksenia Pre-trial dispute settlement quasi-judicial dispute settlement BRICS Brazil Russia India China South Africa |
title_short |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
title_full |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
title_fullStr |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
title_full_unstemmed |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
title_sort |
Some Ideas on Pre-Trial Dispute Settlement in BRICS Countries / Reflexões sobre Resolução de Disputas Pré-Julgamento nos Países do BRICS |
author |
Belikova, Ksenia |
author_facet |
Belikova, Ksenia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Belikova, Ksenia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pre-trial dispute settlement quasi-judicial dispute settlement BRICS Brazil Russia India China South Africa |
topic |
Pre-trial dispute settlement quasi-judicial dispute settlement BRICS Brazil Russia India China South Africa |
description |
Objective: This article is aimed at outlining the approaches to the pre-trial (quasi-judicial) dispute settlement and the landmarks in the establishment and development of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in the BRICS countries in the form of voluntary pre-trial dispute settlement with an emphasis on constructing the system of alternative procedures. The relevance of such a study is determined by its complex nature, giving an understanding of the ADR development vector in the BRICS format, based on relatively new legislation, which was not adequately reflected in scientific books, articles, etc. in the previous period. Thus, the present study fills this gap.Method: Based on analytical reflections on information obtained from sources and literature indicated in the references, the article analyzes the provisions of normative acts and documents of the BRICS countries, creating patterns of ADR development and the potential for its use from the position of legal principles. Having characterized ADR in general, the author successively moves from the approaches of one country to those of another to clarify and outline general ideas in this field based on the foregoing information.Results: The author’s results are presented in a set of legal prescriptions and scientific provisions found in the current legislation with regard to the field of research, including from the perspective of contribution to the further improvement of the ADR concept in the BRICS.Contribution: The theoretical and practical significance of the results is defined by the fact that foreign readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information on the state of the legislation in the BRICS countries in the field under study, which in practical terms will favor understanding of the gap (or lack thereof) in the achievements obtained by Russian and foreign researchers and practitioners in this sphere in terms of their implications at the level of legislation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963 10.12957/rqi.2020.51963 |
url |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.12957/rqi.2020.51963 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/quaestioiuris/article/view/51963/36650 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS; v. 13 n. 04 (2020): REVISTA QUAESTIO IURIS - VOL. 13, N°04; 1649-1671 1516-0351 1807-8389 reponame:Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
collection |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Quaestio Iuris (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
danielqueiroz_uerj@infolink.com.br||revistaquaestiojuris@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799318559442075648 |