A ipseidade na ética argumentativa de Paul Ricoeur

• Autor(a) principal: Homem, Edson de Castro
• Data de Publicação: 2004
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/12158
• topic: Certification; Selfhood; Dialectics; Capacity; Ethics; Moral; Ideology; Utopia; Ascription; Hope; Responsibility; Judgement; Triad; Desire; Obligation; Wisdom; Conflict; Ricoeur, Paul, 1913-2005.; Filosofia francesa; Atestação; Ipseidade; Dialética; Capacidade; Ética; Moral; Ideologia; Utopia; Imputabilidade; Esperança; Responsabilidade; Julgamento; Tríade; Desejo; Dever; Sabedoria; Conflito; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::FILOSOFIA

The ipseity in ethic s argumentative of Paul Ricoeur is the basic reference of the hermeneutic of the selfhood that he always returns. She settles the constant reflexive mediation in the opposition supposed immediate position of the subject. The sameness of the selfhood has like counterpoint the other. In the comparison, it is a synonym of identity-ditto an opposition ipseity-ipse that it includes the others. This inclusion questions the capacity of the self to be ethical and, ergo responsible juridical and morals in the various junction of the other. The ethical project of Ricoeur is comprehensible from and inside his peculiar methodology that he nominates dialectics between the teleological ethics and the deontological moral. This dialectics settles the triad of desire, obligation and practical wisdom in reciprocal activity, privileging the teleological dimension of the desire good s life with the other and for other in fair institutions. The ethics argumentative has the function to give contents the two triads, through the inclusion of the other in selfhood without the reflection about ipseity would lose sense. The practical wisdom of the ethical and moral judgement in situation includes discussion because the conflict is insuperable and it determines the best argument for the eventual consensus. Our thesis is the affirmation capacity s of selfhood to actuate constructive actions. By critique on ideology and utopia Ricoeur bases the dialectics between the principle hope and the principle of responsibility through utopian way of future and realistic way of preoccupation with the present in front of the hard cases that life and the ecosystem are associated. The personal and collective ascription on the past, in the present towards the future is due to the moral responsibility. The selfhood constructs the future in the present by your ethics decisions. It deals about ethical capacity of selfhood.