Os psicólogos e seus relatos selvagens: uma cartografia de medos e inquietações na prática psi no Judiciário

• Autor(a) principal: Saraiva, José Eduardo Menescal
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Tese
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/15042
• topic: Psychological practice; Cartography; Judiciary System; Truth; Science; Interventional-research; Oral history; Genealogy of Power; Prática psicológica; Verdade; Ciência; Pesquisa-intervenção; História oral; Genealogia do poder; Psicologia Social; Cartografia; Judiciário; Ensino médio; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::PSICOLOGIA::PSICOLOGIA SOCIAL

Psychological practice in the judiciary sphere is the main theme of this research. Initially, problematic situations which have become judicial matters at a juvenile court are described. It was observed that there is a predictability expectation from the psychologist practice, i.e. a demand that the psychological assessment either confirm of refute the incidence of real situations such as child abuse , as well as being an indicator of possible future behavior of the parties involved in the court cases. We have attempted to chart Rio de Janeiro State Court or Justice psychologists fears, wishes and expectations taking into account theoretical framework concerning to science, truth, and power. This cartographic construction has been built through the accounts of five professionals, called heteronomous-interlocutors, interviewed based in the Oral History propositions, as well as in the research-intervention perspective, in which the researcher places himself as a research participant cohort. The accounts have yielded reflections of Foucauldian, Institutional Analysis, the actor-network theory, and the Penal abolitionist theory, among others theoretical perspectives. The judiciary institution was analyzed in its historical dimension and in its articulations with power, which lead to a highly hierarchical and vertical environment regarding its internal affairs. Out of this analysis surfaces the character of the magistrate, who detains a nearly unlimited sort of power, to whom one should hold in high respect. The study has had the purpose of eliciting the collective dimension of a practice that is experienced (and suffered) in an individual and isolated manner; as if it were only up to the subjects involved at the cost of much suffering, tension and eventually lack of control and illness the obedient submission to imperatives of institutional order