Tratamento farmacológico para Hepatite C: a incorporação dos antivirais de ação direta pelo Sistema Único de Saúde de 2012 a 2021

• Autor(a) principal: Motta, Renata Marieiro Naves da
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: [e-mail]
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/19400
• topic: Hepatitis C; Antiviral agents; Biomedical technology assessment; Unified Health System; Hepatite C; Antivirais; Avaliação da tecnologia biomédica; Sistema Único de Saúde; CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::SAUDE COLETIVA

Eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) through pharmacological treatment is the only intervention that can halt the progression of hepatitis C. Second-generation direct-acting antivirals (DAA) account for high cure rates in safe therapies and fully oral. In Brazil, different DAA have been offered in the Unified Health System (SUS), based on the recommendations of the National Commission for the Incorporation of Technologies in the Unified Health System (CONITEC) and through the inclusion criteria of the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) for hepatitis C. This dissertation aims to analyze the dynamics of incorporation and the effectiveness of the offer of DAA for the treatment of hepatitis C in the SUS, from 2012 to 2021. Documentary analyzes of the CONITEC recommendation reports and the PCDT updates were carried out, in addition to a search in the Ministry of Health databases on federal purchases and on the dispensing of medicines incorporated in he SUS outpatient production. Ten antiviral treatments, comprising fifteen DAA, were incorporated into the SUS and, among them, four antiviral treatments were excluded during the study period. The DAA were quickly requested to CONITEC for analysis of incorporation soon after their registration with the National Agency for Sanitary Surveillance (ANVISA), all of them being very recent global marketing and with little accumulated experience of use. The time taken to complete the CONITEC administrative process was always shorter than the maximum legal deadline, with public consultation time shortened a few times and without a public hearing. This speed, however, comes up against the interval between the incorporation of the DAA and the first dispensation in the SUS, with an average time longer than the legal deadline for offering them in the care network. In several situations, delays in the first regular public purchase made by the Ministry of Health contributed to these deadlines. Incorporated in 2018 and present in the current PCDT, the elbasvir/grazoprevir association does not have purchase or dispensing records, giving a situation in which therapeutic alternatives remain incorporated and could participate in future price negotiations, according to cost-minimization or simplification criteria of treatment by pangenotypic capacity. It is pointed out that the dynamics of incorporation and exclusion of DAA, although based on scientific criteria, can admit other interferences, whether financial or political. Treatment became simpler with pangenotypic treatments and the country was able to start to dispense DAA in the primary care network, improving universal access to treatment.