Movimento estudantil e produções de subjetividades contemporâneas

• Autor(a) principal: Barbosa, Carla Silva
• Data de Publicação: 2007
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/14873
• topic: subjectivities productions; capitalism; Movimento estudantil; produções de subjetividade; capitalismo; Subjetividade; CNPQ::OUTROS

The present work has objective to analyze some productions of subjectivity that constitute the direction of world from performances of the student s movement, mainly related to superior education, in Brazil. For two secular clippings had been in such a way chosen, not very distant in what it refers to the referring chronology, decades to years 1960-1970 and 1994-2004. These two periods had been chosen by being understood as landmarks in the history of this movement. In the first cited period, the asks for change shows up in Brazil, and also in the student s movement. The disputes between the capitalist and communist subjectivities had opened spaces so that the delinquents gained body, having as the one of its effect potential of the diversity in this period. Already as the period, was chosen by being referring to the year where the neoliberal politics had entered more systematically in the daily college student, producing disastrous effect in that the movement had of prettier: its capacity of get together, its catalyze capacity. Beyond the productions of individual makers subjectivity, in more general scope, the legalist mooring cables had broken up, still more, the student category, thus producing, a hierarchical of the students - as, for example, the Decrees, 2207 of 15/04/1997 and 2306 of 19/08/1997. In this context, we can observe two things: the student s movement, in this scene franksteiniano, that presents base s articulations diffucults, whatever still happening powerful student s movimantations not necessarily articulated with , necessarily the students entities are articulated. Plus a point important to think about this work are the effect of the political institutional space of the students representative entities in this scene already extremely broken up. The split has if widened, however, students if have mobilized, independently of the line of direction and the belonging in these entities. The students joints have conquered resulted more when prompt and related to a common plan, that we could call micropolitician. However, a question shows up in this closing of stated period, pointing with respect to explored ways not yet in this work: it will be that nowadays the victories in the plan micropolitician, which are important, are serving as a species of freezing for a collective joint, definitively. At last, I lock up this work raising this pressing question, and with the aiming of a rearticulation of the students and social movements in generality in what it refers to its organization