Bioestímulo e bioaumento na remediação de solo contaminado com óleo lubrificante usado escala piloto

• Autor(a) principal: Silva, Graciane
• Data de Publicação: 2010
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/11922
• topic: used lubricating oil; bioaugmentation; biostimulation; óleo lubrificante automotivo usado; bioaumento; bioestímulo; CNPQ::ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA QUIMICA::PROCESSOS INDUSTRIAIS DE ENGENHARIA QUIMICA

Lubricating oil is worldwide in machinery and motors. The life-cycle of this petroleum-based product generates a waste, the spent lubricating oil SLO, which is hazardous to the environment when inappropriately disposed. In Brazil, regardless the norms that establish rules for storage, collection, recycling and final disposal of spent-lubricating oil, a large part of it ends up in different environment compartments, causing among others, soil contamination. Therefore, it is important to carry out studies focusing on processes and technology development for remediation of sites contaminated by SLO. The objective of this work was to carry out two experiments of treatability studies for sandy soil contaminated experimentally with 5% (weight/dry weight) of SLO, through two different bioremediation strategies: biostimulation and bioaugmentation. During the first experiment, the aerobic microbial activity in SLO-contaminated soil was assessed through Bartha s respirometry (CO2 productino). During the second experiment, three reactors simulating static biopiles with forced (up-flow) aeration received 125 kg of soil contaminated with 5% (w/dw) SLO, which received the following treatments: pH and moisture adjustment-BIOSca; pH and moisture adjustment associated to bioaugmentation through addition of mature compost from urban solid waste-BIOA1ca and pH and moisture adjustment associated to bioaugmentation with non-mature compost-BIOA2ca. Another group of three bench reactors with no forced aeration, each one containing 3 kg of soil also contaminated with 5% (w/dw) of SLO were filled as following: the first received non-contaminated soil-CONTsa; the second received contaminated soil with pH adjustment-BIOSsa; the third one received contaminated soil with addition of 0.3% (w/dry w) of sodium azide-ABIOsa. The treatments were compared based on removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) and its fractions. After 120 days, the TPH removal was about 75%, 99.99% and 99.99% in BIOS, BIOA1 and BIOA2 respectively, suggesting that optimization of conditions associated to bioaugmentation were the most promising strategy to treat SLO contaminated soils. The fact that after 120 days BIOA1 e BIOA2 did not present differences regarding TPH removal shows that giving time enough, the degree of the compost maturation does not influence the TPH removal. However, treatments that received compost were more efficient than biostimulation alone