Efeito do fator cavitário na resistência adesiva à dentina de um sistema restaurador à base de silorano

• Autor(a) principal: Cruz, Rebecca
• Data de Publicação: 2012
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/14140
• topic: Silorane; C factor; Low polymerization shrinkage; Bond strength; Microtensile; Resinas dentárias; Polimerização; Adaptação marginal dentária; Restauração (Odontologia); Silorano; Fator C; Baixa contração de polimerização; Resistência adesiva; Microtração; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of the C factor in the bond strength of a composite based on silorane to human dentin, comparing its results with a methacrylate-based composite. A total of 40 human molars were used. In half of this sample was used a Class I standard preparation method, comprising the dimensions of 4x4 mm and 2 mm deep, while with the other half was used a virtual preparation method (flat), being applied a white Teflon matrix, respecting the same dimensions cavity (4x4x2 mm), supported on the surface of exposed dentin. Each group was divided into two parts, in accordance with the 2 different restorative systems: P90 Adhesive System and Filtek P90; Filtek Z350 XT and Adper Scotchbond Multipurpose (3 ESPE). Based on manufacturer's specifications the adhesive system was applied , the cavities (real and virtual) were filled with the resins (Z350 XT and P90) in two increments. Polymerization was performed for each increment during 25 seconds. After one week, the crowns were sectioned, obtaining specimens made of resin / tooth in the form of a parallelepiped (stick-shaped). These sticks were used in a microtensile test (Emic), where the bond strength was calculated in Mpa unit . It was used the analysis of variance One-Way ANOVA (p = 0.05) and also, the Student Newman Keuls test for multiple comparisons to evaluate the results statistically. It was observed a statistical difference between the P90 resin (flat = 16.13±7.7 MPa and cavity = 16.75±9.0 MPa) and Z350 XT (flat = 25.82±11.6 MPa and cavity = 24.47±13.5 MPa), regardless of the cavity restored. And it was not possible to observe a statistical difference between the types of cavities (real or flat) restored with the same composite. The conclusion of the tests is: the C factor did not affect the bond strength of two restorative systems applied, and the type of restorative system affects the bond strength, and the system based on silorano presents inferior results than to methacrylate system.