Estudo comparativo dos modelos de avaliação de inovação para obtenção de capital de risco: programa governamental Criatec I - BNDES versus modelos teóricos para cálculo de intangíveis propostos na Contabilidade.

• Autor(a) principal: Costa, Herika Crhistina Maciel de Oliveira
• Data de Publicação: 2015
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/8161
• topic: Public venture capital; Innovation; Intangible Asset; Criatec; Capital de risco público; Inovação; Ativo Intangível; Criatec; Risco (Economia); CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::ADMINISTRACAO::CIENCIAS CONTABEIS

As a way to expand economic growth, governments of many countries encourage entrepreneurship, innovation and technological development through a series of funding and incentive policies, direct at companies with this specific profile. In Brazil, public venture capital is been ofered to innovative companies through the Criatec funds, criated by BNDES. These companies retain mostly intangible assets, wich should be considered by investors, prior to allocating funds. This research was conducted with the objective to compare the methodology for evaluating intangible assets as well as indicators of innovation used by Criatec/BNDES annalists opposed to the theoretical models proposed by accounting literature. To achieve this objective, a field study was conducted trough interviews of Criatec I fund and the CEOs of many companies that were invested upon by the fund. This research conclude through analysis is conducted on companies that apply for Criatec investments, and mainly 3 risk factors are considered by Criatec I. innovation. Indicators of innovation were actualy considered in this analysis, as well as a methodology to evaluate intangible assets. However the use of both these indicators is yet to be standardized.