Análise in vitro da estabilidade de próteses totais superiores implantossuportadas e implantorretidas

• Autor(a) principal: Posch, Aline Tany
• Data de Publicação: 2014
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/14178
• topic: Denture retention; Prosthesis stability; Overdenture; Maxillary overdenture; Bite force; Retenção em dentadura; Estabilidade em prótese total; Sobredentadura; Sobredentadura em maxila; Força mastigatória; Ensaio mecânico; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA

The retain systems used by the complete dentures have been discussed over the past decades in order to achieve a standardization regarding to the clinical treatment of the patients. Considering the important meaning of the stability of dentures for chewing efficiency and for planning appropriate treatment, the aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of the implant-supported and implant-retained prosthesis, using an in vitro study that simulated the bite force. Materials and Methods: Four different types of dentures were tested: 1) G1 - Conventional Denture; 2) G2 Overdenture retained by the ERA ® system ; 3) G3 - Overdenture retained by bar system using clipes and fittings; and 4) G4 - Total implant-supported Prosthesis, following the Brånemark protocol and using Neodent®`s distal bar. Each group was subjected to loading at specific points, located on the elements 16, 26 (F = 300Ncm) and at the anterior region 11/21 (F = 100Ncm). The measurement of vertical displacement during the test was taken out-lying from the loading area and at the elements 16, 26 and in the anterior region, at the element 11/21. Results: The data was analyzed by Shapiro -Wilk normality Test and than by ANOVA and multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni test. Conclusions: The retention system have influenced the vertical movement of the prosthesis in the posterior region contralateral to force application point, with the vertical movement as G1 > G2 > G3 > G4. In the vertical movement of the prosthesis at anterior point, when the force was applied to the posterior teeth, the vertical movement was G1 > G2 > G3 > G4. When the load was applied to the anterior teeth and movement was measured ate the posterior teeth, the behavior was G1 > G2 > G3 > G4. In two of the three situations simulated, there was no statistical difference between the vertical movement between the G3 and G4, suggesting that the stability of overdentures retained by bar with clips and fittings performed like fixed prosthesis.