Agenciamentos coletivos e enunciação aforizante: sugestões em uma revista pedagógica

• Autor(a) principal: Sant\'ana, Gabriel Cardoso Coelho
• Data de Publicação: 2017
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/6281
• topic: Discourse analysis; Representation; Invention; Assemblages of enunciation; Assemblages of bodies; Aphorising enunciation; Linguística; Representação (Filosofia); Invenção (Retórica); Linguística de corpus; Psicolinguística; Análise do discurso; Representação; Invenção; Agenciamentos de enunciação; Agenciamentos de corpos; Enunciação aforizante; CNPQ::LINGUISTICA, LETRAS E ARTES::LINGUISTICA

This research aims to reflect the concepts of representation and invention, created by Deleuze (2006), and contextualize them in the field of linguistic studies. To this end, we have specified this discussion based on the controversy between two currents of thought about language: one that understands language as a representation of reality and another that understands language as an inventor of reality. In this way, we will make two theoretical mappings that are organized in two chapters. In the first one, based on the reflections of Kastrup (1999), Passos (2008), Tedesco (2008) and Bakhtin (1981), we point out this reflection in the fields of psychology and linguistics. In the second mapping, we make an opposition between two theoretical perspectives of language that claim to be pragmatic, that is, Searle's philosophy of language and discourse analysis. We aim to distinguish two types of pragmatic studies: one that tends towards representation and another that tends towards invention. In this context, we will turn to the reflections of Deleuze and Guattari on the acts of speech. Associated with the first research objective, our second objective is to analyze the discourse of the external evaluation carried out in the state education system of Rio de Janeiro. We chose to analyze a pedagogical journal, the analysis corpus consisting of selected statements from the journal. The analysis focuses on assemblages of enunciation (linguistically marked by verbs) and on assemblages of bodies (marked by noun phrases). We aim, therefore, to show which trend follows this discourse - more / less for representation or more / less for invention. Before this chapter of analysis, we make theoretical considerations about the competences (see Ramos, 2006) and control societies (Deleuze, 1992), to contextualize the type of evaluation that is realized in the education (competences evaluation). The concept of a daunting enunciation (see Maingueneau, 2013) helped us to highlight a more representational tendency that such a discourse establishes in the field of education