A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Tese |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
Texto Completo: | http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/17306 |
Resumo: | This thesis analyzes the Brazilian Parliament legislative production since the current Constitution enactment, on October 5, 1988, until 2017, taking into consideration all the different kinds of normative acts. The objective of this work is to demonstrate that the endogenous legislative production — authored by the Parliament — is relevant. The research is justified by existent gaps in the literature about the relevance of the legislative production authored by the Parliament. These analyses largely aim to emphasize the quantitative aspects, to the detriment of the qualitative ones and, as consequence, overvalue the role of the Executive in comparison to that of the Legislative with respect to the production of laws. For the analysis to be carried out, a Relevance Model was created for the evaluation of legislative production, taking into consideration the internal factors based on the institutional design and on the Brazilian legislative process specificities, as well as external factors related to the media and to the contents of public policies. Having been attributed values to each one of the variables, which corresponded to six dimensions of the norm evaluation, the calculation produced the norm index of relevance. The main hypothesis is the existence of relevant legislative production authored by the Parliament. Methodologically, the research is organized in the following way: it begins with the construction of the concept of "legislative relevance", using as reference the concept of relevance established by Political Science literature, in combination with the methodology outlined by foreign literature. Afterwards it comprises the building and validation of the relevance model, when information about the proposals enacted as legal rule has been collected (proposals presented as bills, specific bills to regulate the Constitution, provisional acts, constitutional amendments, legislative decrees and resolutions). It has permitted to verify the model validity and its appropriateness to show the endogenous legislative production relevance. At the end, the research presents the results of qualitative analysis of the legislative production for the applicable period, indicating the existence of relevant legislative production originated from the Federal Legislative Branch in Brazil and, therefore, signs of proactivity of Brazilian Parliament. The results show that the most relevant norms are the constitutional amendments and the bills that regulate the Constitution, the majority of them classified by the model as high and medium relevance. Those of lesser relevance are the ordinary laws, the legislative decrees and the resolutions, mostly classified by the model as low relevance, independently of the authorship. |
id |
UERJ_d5a46dcbfe33a65cefc99597d08254ad |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.bdtd.uerj.br:1/17306 |
network_acronym_str |
UERJ |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
repository_id_str |
2903 |
spelling |
Santos, Fabiano Guilherme Mendeshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3534868879163140Júnior, João Fereshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/4890516395721831Silva, Thiago Moreira dahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2163358625457191Lemos, Leany Barreiro de Sousahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3418648846059187Inácio, Magna Mariahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3137727272142712http://lattes.cnpq.br/0866888980658538Amaral, Ana Regina Villar PeresANAREGINA.AMARAL7@GMAIL.COM2022-03-16T16:56:35Z2018-11-23Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres. A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade?. 2018. 325 f. Tese (Doutorado em ciência Política) - Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2018.http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/17306This thesis analyzes the Brazilian Parliament legislative production since the current Constitution enactment, on October 5, 1988, until 2017, taking into consideration all the different kinds of normative acts. The objective of this work is to demonstrate that the endogenous legislative production — authored by the Parliament — is relevant. The research is justified by existent gaps in the literature about the relevance of the legislative production authored by the Parliament. These analyses largely aim to emphasize the quantitative aspects, to the detriment of the qualitative ones and, as consequence, overvalue the role of the Executive in comparison to that of the Legislative with respect to the production of laws. For the analysis to be carried out, a Relevance Model was created for the evaluation of legislative production, taking into consideration the internal factors based on the institutional design and on the Brazilian legislative process specificities, as well as external factors related to the media and to the contents of public policies. Having been attributed values to each one of the variables, which corresponded to six dimensions of the norm evaluation, the calculation produced the norm index of relevance. The main hypothesis is the existence of relevant legislative production authored by the Parliament. Methodologically, the research is organized in the following way: it begins with the construction of the concept of "legislative relevance", using as reference the concept of relevance established by Political Science literature, in combination with the methodology outlined by foreign literature. Afterwards it comprises the building and validation of the relevance model, when information about the proposals enacted as legal rule has been collected (proposals presented as bills, specific bills to regulate the Constitution, provisional acts, constitutional amendments, legislative decrees and resolutions). It has permitted to verify the model validity and its appropriateness to show the endogenous legislative production relevance. At the end, the research presents the results of qualitative analysis of the legislative production for the applicable period, indicating the existence of relevant legislative production originated from the Federal Legislative Branch in Brazil and, therefore, signs of proactivity of Brazilian Parliament. The results show that the most relevant norms are the constitutional amendments and the bills that regulate the Constitution, the majority of them classified by the model as high and medium relevance. Those of lesser relevance are the ordinary laws, the legislative decrees and the resolutions, mostly classified by the model as low relevance, independently of the authorship.Esta tese analisa a produção legislativa do Parlamento brasileiro desde a promulgação da atual Constituição, em 5 de outubro de 1988, até o ano de 2017, considerando todos os tipos de atos normativos. O objetivo deste trabalho é mostrar que a produção legislativa endógena — de autoria do Legislativo — tem relevância. A pesquisa se justifica diante das lacunas existentes na literatura acerca da relevância da produção legislativa de autoria do Legislativo. Essas análises buscam, em grande parte, ressaltar os aspectos quantitativos, em detrimento de seus aspectos qualitativos, e acabam por superestimar o papel do Executivo em comparação ao do Legislativo no que se refere à produção de leis. Para permitir essa análise, construiu-se um Modelo de Relevância destinado a avaliar a produção legislativa, considerando os fatores internos baseados no desenho institucional, nas especificidades do processo legislativo brasileiro e em fatores externos relacionados à mídia e ao conteúdo das políticas públicas. Atribuídos valores a cada uma das variáveis – correspondendo a seis dimensões de avaliação –, o cômputo produziu o índice de relevância da norma. A hipótese principal é a existência de produção legislativa relevante de autoria do Legislativo. Metodologicamente, a pesquisa se organiza da seguinte forma: inicia com a construção do conceito de ―relevância legislativa‖, tomando por referência o conceito desenvolvido pela literatura em Ciência Política, conjugando-o com metodologia delineada pela literatura estrangeira. Em seguida, compreende a elaboração e a validação do modelo de relevância, quando então foram colhidas as informações sobre as proposições transformadas em norma jurídica (oriundas de projetos de lei ordinária e complementar, medidas provisórias, propostas de emenda à Constituição, projetos de decreto legislativo e de resolução), permitindo que se verificasse a validade do modelo e sua pertinência para mostrar a relevância da produção legislativa endógena. Ao final, o estudo apresenta os resultados da análise qualitativa da produção legislativa no período examinado, mostrando que há produção relevante de origem do próprio Legislativo e, em consequência, sinais de proatividade do Parlamento brasileiro. Os resultados mostram que as normas de maior relevância são as emendas à Constituição e as leis complementares, classificadas pelo modelo – a maior parte – como de alta e média relevância. As de menor relevância são as leis ordinárias, os decretos legislativos e as resoluções, classificadas pelo modelo em sua maioria como de baixa relevância, independentemente da autoria.Submitted by Natasha CCS/D IESP (natashaprioste@gmail.com) on 2022-03-16T16:56:35Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese - Ana Regina Villar Peres Amaral - 2018 - Completa.pdf: 2612810 bytes, checksum: d1ecae6b56cd84dc8fa5881373d19dc5 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2022-03-16T16:56:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese - Ana Regina Villar Peres Amaral - 2018 - Completa.pdf: 2612810 bytes, checksum: d1ecae6b56cd84dc8fa5881373d19dc5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-11-23application/pdfporUniversidade do Estado do Rio de JaneiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência PolíticaUERJBrasilCentro de Ciências Sociais::Instituto de Estudos Sociais e PolíticosRelevance ModelLegislative ProductionLegislative ProcessBrazilian ParliamentModelo de RelevânciaProdução LegislativaProcesso LegislativoParlamento brasileiroPoder legislativo - BrasilLeis - ElaboraçãoCiência politicaCIENCIAS HUMANASA produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade?info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJinstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UERJORIGINALTese - Ana Regina Villar Peres Amaral - 2018 - Completa.pdfTese - Ana Regina Villar Peres Amaral - 2018 - Completa.pdfapplication/pdf2612810http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/17306/2/Tese+-+Ana+Regina+Villar+Peres+Amaral+-+2018+-+Completa.pdfd1ecae6b56cd84dc8fa5881373d19dc5MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82123http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/17306/1/license.txte5502652da718045d7fcd832b79fca29MD511/173062024-02-26 11:40:36.622oai:www.bdtd.uerj.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.bdtd.uerj.br/PUBhttps://www.bdtd.uerj.br:8443/oai/requestbdtd.suporte@uerj.bropendoar:29032024-02-26T14:40:36Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false |
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
title |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
spellingShingle |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres Relevance Model Legislative Production Legislative Process Brazilian Parliament Modelo de Relevância Produção Legislativa Processo Legislativo Parlamento brasileiro Poder legislativo - Brasil Leis - Elaboração Ciência politica CIENCIAS HUMANAS |
title_short |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
title_full |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
title_fullStr |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
title_full_unstemmed |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
title_sort |
A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade? |
author |
Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres |
author_facet |
Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres ANAREGINA.AMARAL7@GMAIL.COM |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
ANAREGINA.AMARAL7@GMAIL.COM |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Fabiano Guilherme Mendes |
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3534868879163140 |
dc.contributor.referee1.fl_str_mv |
Júnior, João Feres |
dc.contributor.referee1Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/4890516395721831 |
dc.contributor.referee2.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Thiago Moreira da |
dc.contributor.referee2Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/2163358625457191 |
dc.contributor.referee3.fl_str_mv |
Lemos, Leany Barreiro de Sousa |
dc.contributor.referee3Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3418648846059187 |
dc.contributor.referee4.fl_str_mv |
Inácio, Magna Maria |
dc.contributor.referee4Lattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/3137727272142712 |
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv |
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0866888980658538 |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres ANAREGINA.AMARAL7@GMAIL.COM |
contributor_str_mv |
Santos, Fabiano Guilherme Mendes Júnior, João Feres Silva, Thiago Moreira da Lemos, Leany Barreiro de Sousa Inácio, Magna Maria |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Relevance Model Legislative Production Legislative Process Brazilian Parliament |
topic |
Relevance Model Legislative Production Legislative Process Brazilian Parliament Modelo de Relevância Produção Legislativa Processo Legislativo Parlamento brasileiro Poder legislativo - Brasil Leis - Elaboração Ciência politica CIENCIAS HUMANAS |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Modelo de Relevância Produção Legislativa Processo Legislativo Parlamento brasileiro Poder legislativo - Brasil Leis - Elaboração Ciência politica |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS |
description |
This thesis analyzes the Brazilian Parliament legislative production since the current Constitution enactment, on October 5, 1988, until 2017, taking into consideration all the different kinds of normative acts. The objective of this work is to demonstrate that the endogenous legislative production — authored by the Parliament — is relevant. The research is justified by existent gaps in the literature about the relevance of the legislative production authored by the Parliament. These analyses largely aim to emphasize the quantitative aspects, to the detriment of the qualitative ones and, as consequence, overvalue the role of the Executive in comparison to that of the Legislative with respect to the production of laws. For the analysis to be carried out, a Relevance Model was created for the evaluation of legislative production, taking into consideration the internal factors based on the institutional design and on the Brazilian legislative process specificities, as well as external factors related to the media and to the contents of public policies. Having been attributed values to each one of the variables, which corresponded to six dimensions of the norm evaluation, the calculation produced the norm index of relevance. The main hypothesis is the existence of relevant legislative production authored by the Parliament. Methodologically, the research is organized in the following way: it begins with the construction of the concept of "legislative relevance", using as reference the concept of relevance established by Political Science literature, in combination with the methodology outlined by foreign literature. Afterwards it comprises the building and validation of the relevance model, when information about the proposals enacted as legal rule has been collected (proposals presented as bills, specific bills to regulate the Constitution, provisional acts, constitutional amendments, legislative decrees and resolutions). It has permitted to verify the model validity and its appropriateness to show the endogenous legislative production relevance. At the end, the research presents the results of qualitative analysis of the legislative production for the applicable period, indicating the existence of relevant legislative production originated from the Federal Legislative Branch in Brazil and, therefore, signs of proactivity of Brazilian Parliament. The results show that the most relevant norms are the constitutional amendments and the bills that regulate the Constitution, the majority of them classified by the model as high and medium relevance. Those of lesser relevance are the ordinary laws, the legislative decrees and the resolutions, mostly classified by the model as low relevance, independently of the authorship. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018-11-23 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16T16:56:35Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
format |
doctoralThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres. A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade?. 2018. 325 f. Tese (Doutorado em ciência Política) - Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2018. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/17306 |
identifier_str_mv |
Amaral, Ana Regina Villar Peres. A produção legislativa no Brasil de 1988 a 2017: relevância e proatividade?. 2018. 325 f. Tese (Doutorado em ciência Política) - Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 2018. |
url |
http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/17306 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência Política |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
UERJ |
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv |
Brasil |
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv |
Centro de Ciências Sociais::Instituto de Estudos Sociais e Políticos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) instacron:UERJ |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
instacron_str |
UERJ |
institution |
UERJ |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/17306/2/Tese+-+Ana+Regina+Villar+Peres+Amaral+-+2018+-+Completa.pdf http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/bitstream/1/17306/1/license.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
d1ecae6b56cd84dc8fa5881373d19dc5 e5502652da718045d7fcd832b79fca29 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bdtd.suporte@uerj.br |
_version_ |
1811728705665368064 |