Comparação tridimensional dos efeitos dentários de duas mecânicas para fechamento de espaço: estudo preliminar

• Autor(a) principal: Dardengo, Camila de Sousa
• Data de Publicação: 2013
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/14182
• topic: Orthodontic anchorage procedures; Tooth extractions; Tomography; Procedimentos de ancoragem ortodôntica; Extração dentária; Tomografia; CNPQ::CIENCIAS DA SAUDE::ODONTOLOGIA

Class I malocclusions with dental biprotrusion are characterized by the projection of upper and lower incisors and can be corrected with extractions of four first premolars, allowing incisor retraction using the posterior teeth as anchorage. The purpose of this research was to compare the movement of molars and incisors, by superimpostions of three-dimensional models, with two space closure techniques. Six patients with indication for four first premolar extractions were selected, tomographed (T0) and randomly assigned to two groups. For Group 1 (n=3) premolar extraction space closure was performed in one-stage (en masse retraction) and for group 2 (n=3) in two stages (canine retraction followed by incisor retraction). After complete space closure, a new tomograph was taken (T1). The three-dimensional models, in T0 and T1, for both groups were superimposed to describe and quantify first molar movement. Incisor retraction was evaluated in two dimensions. The upper and lower molars in group 1 presented bodily mesial movement, while those in group 2, presented greater crown than root movement, demonstrating mesial crown tipping. When the amount of mesial molar movement was compared between the two groups, a greater mesial root movement was observed for upper molars in group 1 (p=0.009). However, in both groups the upper molars rotated aroung the palatal root. In the lower arch, a greater mesial crown movement was observed in group 2 (p=0.015). Incisor movement analysis presented similar variations for linear and angular measurements for upper incisors in both groups. In contrast, the angular measurements for the lower incisors demonstrated more torque control in group 2. The treatment time for all patients in the sample was greater than 30 months, with the exception of one patient, who presented treatment time smaller than 24 months. In conclusion, anchorage loss ocurred by bodily movement in en masse space closure and by mesial crown tipping in two-stage space closure, in both arches. In addition, there might be greater mesial root movement for upper molars in en masse space closure and greater mesial crown movement in two-stage space closure. It can also be suggested that there are no differences in upper incisor retraction and there is greater lower incisor uprighting in two-stage space closure.