Avaliação de diferentes estratégias de biorremediação de solo argiloso contaminado por óleo em biorreator de fase semi-sólida

• Autor(a) principal: Almeida, Maria de Fátima Barbosa de
• Data de Publicação: 2011
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UERJ
• Texto Completo: http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/handle/1/15684
• topic: Bioremediation; bioreactors; lubricating oil; surfactant; Biorremediação; biorreatores; óleo lubrificante; surfactante; CNPQ::CIENCIAS EXATAS E DA TERRA::QUIMICA

The practice of exchange of used lubricating oil, automotive oils in particular, represents a serious environmental problem due to its hazardous nature, the misuse and it s indiscriminate disposal of same in the environment. Strategies for remediation of contaminated areas by this waste are necessary, particularly in case of soils with clayey nature. This study aimed to evaluate the bioremediation of a clayey soil contaminated by lubricating oil using bioreactors of semi-solid phase. Erlenmeyer flasks containing 20 g of contaminated soil with 3% (w / w) of lubricating oil, in triplicate, were kept at constant temperature and agitation, according to the following treatment strategies: (i) biostimulation with nutrient adjustment (BIOE), (ii) addition of bioaugmentation with microbial inoculum acclimated (BIOA), (iii) addition of biostimulation and synthetic surfactant Tween-80 (BIOES) (iv) bioaugmentation, biostimulation and synthetic surfactant Tween-80 (BIOAS) and (iv) control with purified distilled water (CONT). The contaminant removal efficiency was evaluated after 68 days of treatment by analysis of evolution of CO2, reduction of TOC, decay of HTP, n-alkanes, and fractions of saturated hydrocarbons, aromatics and polar compounds. The BIOAS treatment resulted in increased accumulated production of CO2 (1247.0 mg.20g-1 soil) followed by BIOES treatment (1077.6 mg.20g-1 soil). At the end of the experiment, all treatments significantly reduced the levels of HTP as compared to control (11.1 ± 4.2%). The BIOAS and BIOES treatments presented no significant differences in the reduction of HTP (42.0 ± 3.7% and 37.4 ± 6.3%, respectively). Both biostimulation and bioaugmentation were shown to be strategies with potential to increase the effectiveness of bioremediation in a clayey soil, and the addition of surfactant being the most important factor, increasing significantly the capacity of removal in both strategies. The use of bioreactors in semi-solid phase bioremediation in a clayey soil contaminated by lubricating oil proved to be very promising, and this strategy can be applied to at higher scales