Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Fernando Bonadia de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Trilhas Filosóficas (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/article/view/1547
Resumo: This work intents to accomplish a prime approach to the reasons why Espinosa didn"™t accept the invitation to lecture at heidelberg Academy. The invitation was made by Ludovicus Fabritius, in an answer to Elitor Palatino´s request, by a letter on February, 16th 1673. Espinosa´s answer, refusing the invitation, was written down on March, 30th, at the same year. Although they would guarantee him a certain freedom of philosophizing at this institution, Espinosa refused the offer, presenting two reasons: (1) the fact that the disposal of his time to the youth lecture would disturb his own philosophy advancement and (2) the unknown limits of freedom he would have been offered. Throughout his analytic bibliographic study, this work will examine in which way this reasons should be understood, when read through what Espinosa expresses on his works, showing how this invitation refuse is in deeply agreement to what his philosophy teaches and defends, that means, the soul tranquility and freedom of teaching. Moreover, there is an appendix with the letter"™s translation containing the Espinosa"™s answer to Ludovicus Fabritius.
id UERN-3_0eace0db7ec1e2b9765869ac6b76acf4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.periodicos.apps.uern.br:article/1547
network_acronym_str UERN-3
network_name_str Trilhas Filosóficas (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg? Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Liberdade de ensinar – Ensino de filosofia – heidelberg – Filosofia da Educação.Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Freedom of teaching - Teaching of philosophy - heidelberg – Philosophy of Education.This work intents to accomplish a prime approach to the reasons why Espinosa didn"™t accept the invitation to lecture at heidelberg Academy. The invitation was made by Ludovicus Fabritius, in an answer to Elitor Palatino´s request, by a letter on February, 16th 1673. Espinosa´s answer, refusing the invitation, was written down on March, 30th, at the same year. Although they would guarantee him a certain freedom of philosophizing at this institution, Espinosa refused the offer, presenting two reasons: (1) the fact that the disposal of his time to the youth lecture would disturb his own philosophy advancement and (2) the unknown limits of freedom he would have been offered. Throughout his analytic bibliographic study, this work will examine in which way this reasons should be understood, when read through what Espinosa expresses on his works, showing how this invitation refuse is in deeply agreement to what his philosophy teaches and defends, that means, the soul tranquility and freedom of teaching. Moreover, there is an appendix with the letter"™s translation containing the Espinosa"™s answer to Ludovicus Fabritius.Este trabalho pretende realizar uma primeira aproximação das razões pelas quais Espinosa (1632-1677) não aceitou o convite para lecionar filosofia na Academia de heidelberg. O convite fora-lhe feito por Ludovicus Fabritius a pedido do Eleitor Palatino, por carta datada de 16 de fevereiro de 1673. A resposta de Espinosa, declinando do convite, foi redigida a 30 de março do mesmo ano. Embora lhe fosse garantida certa liberdade para filosofar nesta instituição, Espinosa recusa a oferta apresentando dois motivos: (1) o fato de que a destinação de tempo para a instrução da juventude obstaria seus próprios avanços na filosofia e (2) o desconhecimento de quais seriam os limites da liberdade de filosofar a ele prometida. Através de um estudo bibliográfico-analí­tico, este trabalho examinará em que sentido essas razões devem ser compreendidas quando lidas à luz daquilo que Espinosa expressa em outras obras, mostrando como a refutação deste convite está em profundo acordo com aquilo que sua filosofia ensina e defende, isto é, a tranqüilidade da alma e a liberdade de ensinar. Ademais, há um apêndice com uma tradução da carta que contém a resposta de Espinosa a Ludovicus Fabritius. Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte - UERN2020-04-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/article/view/1547Trilhas Filosóficas; v. 1 n. 1 (2008): Trilhas Filosóficas; 101-1141984-5561reponame:Trilhas Filosóficas (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)instacron:UERNporhttps://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/article/view/1547/1480Copyright (c) 2008 Fernando Bonadia de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Fernando Bonadia de 2020-05-22T21:22:41Zoai:ojs2.periodicos.apps.uern.br:article/1547Revistahttp://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/indexPUBhttp://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/oaitrilhasfilosoficas@uern.br || marcos_erico@yahoo.com.br10.25244/tf1984-55611982-7490opendoar:2020-05-22T21:22:41Trilhas Filosóficas (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
title Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
spellingShingle Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
Oliveira, Fernando Bonadia de
Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Liberdade de ensinar – Ensino de filosofia – heidelberg – Filosofia da Educação.
Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Freedom of teaching - Teaching of philosophy - heidelberg – Philosophy of Education.
title_short Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
title_full Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
title_fullStr Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
title_full_unstemmed Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
title_sort Por que Espinosa recusou o convite para ser professor de filosofia em Heidelberg?
author Oliveira, Fernando Bonadia de
author_facet Oliveira, Fernando Bonadia de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Fernando Bonadia de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Liberdade de ensinar – Ensino de filosofia – heidelberg – Filosofia da Educação.
Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Freedom of teaching - Teaching of philosophy - heidelberg – Philosophy of Education.
topic Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Liberdade de ensinar – Ensino de filosofia – heidelberg – Filosofia da Educação.
Espinosa, Bento de (1632-1677) – Freedom of teaching - Teaching of philosophy - heidelberg – Philosophy of Education.
description This work intents to accomplish a prime approach to the reasons why Espinosa didn"™t accept the invitation to lecture at heidelberg Academy. The invitation was made by Ludovicus Fabritius, in an answer to Elitor Palatino´s request, by a letter on February, 16th 1673. Espinosa´s answer, refusing the invitation, was written down on March, 30th, at the same year. Although they would guarantee him a certain freedom of philosophizing at this institution, Espinosa refused the offer, presenting two reasons: (1) the fact that the disposal of his time to the youth lecture would disturb his own philosophy advancement and (2) the unknown limits of freedom he would have been offered. Throughout his analytic bibliographic study, this work will examine in which way this reasons should be understood, when read through what Espinosa expresses on his works, showing how this invitation refuse is in deeply agreement to what his philosophy teaches and defends, that means, the soul tranquility and freedom of teaching. Moreover, there is an appendix with the letter"™s translation containing the Espinosa"™s answer to Ludovicus Fabritius.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/article/view/1547
url https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/article/view/1547
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.apps.uern.br/index.php/RTF/article/view/1547/1480
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2008 Fernando Bonadia de Oliveira
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2008 Fernando Bonadia de Oliveira
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte - UERN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte - UERN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Trilhas Filosóficas; v. 1 n. 1 (2008): Trilhas Filosóficas; 101-114
1984-5561
reponame:Trilhas Filosóficas (Online)
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
instacron:UERN
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
instacron_str UERN
institution UERN
reponame_str Trilhas Filosóficas (Online)
collection Trilhas Filosóficas (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Trilhas Filosóficas (Online) - Universidade do Estado do Rio Grande do Norte (UERN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv trilhasfilosoficas@uern.br || marcos_erico@yahoo.com.br
_version_ 1797240255315705856