O historiador e o fato: uma análise do discurso sobre o fazer historiográfico na obra Historiadores pela democracia: o golpe de 2016 e a força do passado

• Autor(a) principal: Nascimento, Ayrton Matheus da Silva
• Data de Publicação: 2020
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)
• Texto Completo: http://www.repositorio.ufal.br/handle/riufal/6753
• topic: História - Teoria; Historiografia; Análise do discurso; Teoria da história; CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::HISTORIA::TEORIA E FILOSOFIA DA HISTORIA

Reflections about the production of historical knowledge had their primacy at various other times in History, given the examples of clashes between positivists and historicists in the 19h century, or between historical materialists and postmodernists in the 20th century, which has started to decline in recent times and/or are restricted by these discussions in the area of historiography. And it is in this context that this research emerges, which aims to reflect on the development of historiography knowledge and its production conditions, considering the historian subject and its socio-historical-ideological crossings and how these issues materialize themselves in the discursive construction of the historiographical narrative. To carry out this research we analyzed the book “Historiadores pela democracia: o golpe de 2016 e a força do passado” as our primary source, organized by the historians Hebe Mattos, Tânia Bessone and Beatris G. Marmigoniam (2016). This work contains a collection of texts written by 35 authors, including historians and social scientists. And in our gesture of analysis we seek to incorporate contributions from the theoretical-analytical provided from the French Discourse Analysis (AD or ADF), according to: Pêcheux (1993; 2009; 2012); Ferreira (2005); Zandwais (2009); Orlandi (1997; 2012) etc. to think epistemological issues within the discursivities. For the accomplishment of this research we made the clipping of ten discursive sequences (SDs), having as criterion the direct relations with the writing of History for the constitution of our discursive corpus. In the process of unveiling the SDs we triggered categories such as: intradiscourse, forgetfulness, conditions of production, etc. by using AD to allows us to perceive the socio-historical-ideological crossings that affect the historian subject in the realization of his office and how class relations are present in the clash of interpretation and attribution of meanings of historical facts. This research is theoretically located within the Theory of History field, specifically Historiography, as well in the History of the Present Time, based on the contributions of: Collingwood (1978); Rocha (1982); Bourdé & Martin (1983); Pinsk (1991); Bloch (2001); Bourdieu (2002); Koselleck (2006); Durkheim (2007); Gomes (2008); Oliva (2008), Kuhn (2009); Cardoso (2012); Barros (2011); Rezende (2010), etc. In short, we perceive the influence and determination of capitalist and patriarchal systems on the basis and on social relationship, and how the game of bourgeois class’ exploitation and dominion has been legitimized and/or confronted through the historiographical discourses.