SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | GeoTextos (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496 |
Resumo: | This paper analyzes, based on data from 2010, the social organization in Brazil, measured by the distribution of Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations (FASFIL), comparing them with the main socioeconomic indicators. The concept of socio-territorial capital is adopted, based on the notion of social capital (PUTNAM, 1996). This concept values the territorial networking, the bonds of cohesion and cooperation and the territorial rooting, that is, the interaction in different sectors and scales. An analysis is made for the relation between by FASFIL and GDP per capita for the Major Regions and for the Federation Units. The results confirm regional imbalances and interstate imbalances, that is, where there is more FASFIL income is higher. The analysis is also done for the main metropolitan regions and for the metropolises, now involving, in addition to GDP per capita, seven socioeconomic indicators (HDI, Gini index, Life expectancy at birth, Infant mortality, Persons with complete upper level, Percentage of vulnerable to poverty and Formalization of the employed). The results are more expressive than in the scale of the Federation Units, especially at the level of the metropolises, that is, they express more prominently the relation between FASFIL and socio territorial capital. |
id |
UFBA-12_b89cbc06dbd4f9dffd9a74cb6bacad3e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/20496 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-12 |
network_name_str |
GeoTextos (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZILCapital socioterritorial e indicadores de desenvolvimento: um estudo comparativo no BrasilCapital socioterritorialDesenvolvimentoUnidades da FederaçãoRegiões metropolitanasMetrópoles This paper analyzes, based on data from 2010, the social organization in Brazil, measured by the distribution of Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations (FASFIL), comparing them with the main socioeconomic indicators. The concept of socio-territorial capital is adopted, based on the notion of social capital (PUTNAM, 1996). This concept values the territorial networking, the bonds of cohesion and cooperation and the territorial rooting, that is, the interaction in different sectors and scales. An analysis is made for the relation between by FASFIL and GDP per capita for the Major Regions and for the Federation Units. The results confirm regional imbalances and interstate imbalances, that is, where there is more FASFIL income is higher. The analysis is also done for the main metropolitan regions and for the metropolises, now involving, in addition to GDP per capita, seven socioeconomic indicators (HDI, Gini index, Life expectancy at birth, Infant mortality, Persons with complete upper level, Percentage of vulnerable to poverty and Formalization of the employed). The results are more expressive than in the scale of the Federation Units, especially at the level of the metropolises, that is, they express more prominently the relation between FASFIL and socio territorial capital.Este trabalho analisa, com base em dados de 2010, a organização social no Brasil, medida pela distribuição das Fundações Privadas e Associações sem Fins Lucrativos (FASFIL), comparando-as com os principais indicadores socioeconômicos. Para tanto, é adotado o conceito, apoiado na noção de capital social (PUTNAM, 1996), de capital socioterritorial, que valoriza o enredamento territorial, os laços de coesão e de cooperação e o enraizamento territorial. Inicialmente, é feita uma análise da relação Pessoas por FASFIL com o PIB per capita para as Grandes Regiões e para as Unidades da Federação. Os resultados confirmam os desequilíbrios regionais e os desequilíbrios interestaduais, isto é, onde a relação Pessoas/ FASFIL é mais favorável, a renda per capita é maior. Em seguida, a análise é feita para as principais regiões metropolitanas e para as metrópoles, envolvendo, além do PIB per capita, sete indicadores socioeconômicos (IDH, Índice de Gini, Esperança de vida ao nascer, Mortalidade infantil, Pessoas com nível superior completo, Porcentagem de vulneráveis à pobreza e Formalização dos ocupados). Os resultados são mais expressivos do que na escala das Unidades da Federação, especialmente no nível das metrópoles, ou seja, expressam mais destacadamente a relação entre FASFIL e capital socioterritorial. Universidade Federal da Bahia2017-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/2049610.9771/1984-5537geo.v13i1.20496GeoTextos; Vol. 13, N. 1 (julho de 2017)1984-55371809-189X10.9771/geo.v13i1reponame:GeoTextos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496/14740Copyright (c) 2017 GeoTextosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello eSilva, Barbara-Christine NentwigSilva, Maina Pirajá2017-07-30T07:13:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/20496Revistahttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/oaiangeloserpa@hotmail.com||rodrigomei@hotmail.com1984-55371809-189Xopendoar:2017-07-30T07:13:14GeoTextos (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL Capital socioterritorial e indicadores de desenvolvimento: um estudo comparativo no Brasil |
title |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL |
spellingShingle |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e Capital socioterritorial Desenvolvimento Unidades da Federação Regiões metropolitanas Metrópoles |
title_short |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL |
title_full |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL |
title_fullStr |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL |
title_full_unstemmed |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL |
title_sort |
SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL |
author |
Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e |
author_facet |
Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig Silva, Maina Pirajá |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig Silva, Maina Pirajá |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig Silva, Maina Pirajá |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Capital socioterritorial Desenvolvimento Unidades da Federação Regiões metropolitanas Metrópoles |
topic |
Capital socioterritorial Desenvolvimento Unidades da Federação Regiões metropolitanas Metrópoles |
description |
This paper analyzes, based on data from 2010, the social organization in Brazil, measured by the distribution of Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations (FASFIL), comparing them with the main socioeconomic indicators. The concept of socio-territorial capital is adopted, based on the notion of social capital (PUTNAM, 1996). This concept values the territorial networking, the bonds of cohesion and cooperation and the territorial rooting, that is, the interaction in different sectors and scales. An analysis is made for the relation between by FASFIL and GDP per capita for the Major Regions and for the Federation Units. The results confirm regional imbalances and interstate imbalances, that is, where there is more FASFIL income is higher. The analysis is also done for the main metropolitan regions and for the metropolises, now involving, in addition to GDP per capita, seven socioeconomic indicators (HDI, Gini index, Life expectancy at birth, Infant mortality, Persons with complete upper level, Percentage of vulnerable to poverty and Formalization of the employed). The results are more expressive than in the scale of the Federation Units, especially at the level of the metropolises, that is, they express more prominently the relation between FASFIL and socio territorial capital. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496 10.9771/1984-5537geo.v13i1.20496 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.9771/1984-5537geo.v13i1.20496 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496/14740 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 GeoTextos info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 GeoTextos |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
GeoTextos; Vol. 13, N. 1 (julho de 2017) 1984-5537 1809-189X 10.9771/geo.v13i1 reponame:GeoTextos (Online) instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
GeoTextos (Online) |
collection |
GeoTextos (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
GeoTextos (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
angeloserpa@hotmail.com||rodrigomei@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1797221575602208768 |