SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig, Silva, Maina Pirajá
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: GeoTextos (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496
Resumo: This paper analyzes, based on data from 2010, the social organization in Brazil, measured by the distribution of Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations (FASFIL), comparing them with the main socioeconomic indicators. The concept of socio-territorial capital is adopted, based on the notion of social capital (PUTNAM, 1996). This concept values the territorial networking, the bonds of cohesion and cooperation and the territorial rooting, that is, the interaction in different sectors and scales. An analysis is made for the relation between by FASFIL and GDP per capita for the Major Regions and for the Federation Units. The results confirm regional imbalances and interstate imbalances, that is, where there is more FASFIL income is higher. The analysis is also done for the main metropolitan regions and for the metropolises, now involving, in addition to GDP per capita, seven socioeconomic indicators (HDI, Gini index, Life expectancy at birth, Infant mortality, Persons with complete upper level, Percentage of vulnerable to poverty and Formalization of the employed). The results are more expressive than in the scale of the Federation Units, especially at the level of the metropolises, that is, they express more prominently the relation between FASFIL and socio territorial capital.
id UFBA-12_b89cbc06dbd4f9dffd9a74cb6bacad3e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/20496
network_acronym_str UFBA-12
network_name_str GeoTextos (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZILCapital socioterritorial e indicadores de desenvolvimento: um estudo comparativo no BrasilCapital socioterritorialDesenvolvimentoUnidades da FederaçãoRegiões metropolitanasMetrópoles This paper analyzes, based on data from 2010, the social organization in Brazil, measured by the distribution of Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations (FASFIL), comparing them with the main socioeconomic indicators. The concept of socio-territorial capital is adopted, based on the notion of social capital (PUTNAM, 1996). This concept values the territorial networking, the bonds of cohesion and cooperation and the territorial rooting, that is, the interaction in different sectors and scales. An analysis is made for the relation between by FASFIL and GDP per capita for the Major Regions and for the Federation Units. The results confirm regional imbalances and interstate imbalances, that is, where there is more FASFIL income is higher. The analysis is also done for the main metropolitan regions and for the metropolises, now involving, in addition to GDP per capita, seven socioeconomic indicators (HDI, Gini index, Life expectancy at birth, Infant mortality, Persons with complete upper level, Percentage of vulnerable to poverty and Formalization of the employed). The results are more expressive than in the scale of the Federation Units, especially at the level of the metropolises, that is, they express more prominently the relation between FASFIL and socio territorial capital.Este trabalho analisa, com base em dados de 2010, a organização social no Brasil, medida pela distribuição das Fundações Privadas e Associações sem Fins Lucrativos (FASFIL), comparando-as com os principais indicadores socioeconômicos. Para tanto, é adotado o conceito, apoiado na noção de capital social (PUTNAM, 1996), de capital socioterritorial, que valoriza o enredamento territorial, os laços de coesão e de cooperação e o enraizamento territorial. Inicialmente, é feita uma análise da relação Pessoas por FASFIL com o PIB per capita para as Grandes Regiões e para as Unidades da Federação. Os resultados confirmam os desequilíbrios regionais e os desequilíbrios interestaduais, isto é, onde a relação Pessoas/ FASFIL é mais favorável, a renda per capita é maior. Em seguida, a análise é feita para as principais regiões metropolitanas e para as metrópoles, envolvendo, além do PIB per capita, sete indicadores socioeconômicos (IDH, Índice de Gini, Esperança de vida ao nascer, Mortalidade infantil, Pessoas com nível superior completo, Porcentagem de vulneráveis à pobreza e Formalização dos ocupados). Os resultados são mais expressivos do que na escala das Unidades da Federação, especialmente no nível das metrópoles, ou seja, expressam mais destacadamente a relação entre FASFIL e capital socioterritorial. Universidade Federal da Bahia2017-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/2049610.9771/1984-5537geo.v13i1.20496GeoTextos; Vol. 13, N. 1 (julho de 2017)1984-55371809-189X10.9771/geo.v13i1reponame:GeoTextos (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496/14740Copyright (c) 2017 GeoTextosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello eSilva, Barbara-Christine NentwigSilva, Maina Pirajá2017-07-30T07:13:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/20496Revistahttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/oaiangeloserpa@hotmail.com||rodrigomei@hotmail.com1984-55371809-189Xopendoar:2017-07-30T07:13:14GeoTextos (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
Capital socioterritorial e indicadores de desenvolvimento: um estudo comparativo no Brasil
title SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
spellingShingle SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e
Capital socioterritorial
Desenvolvimento
Unidades da Federação
Regiões metropolitanas
Metrópoles
title_short SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
title_full SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
title_fullStr SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
title_full_unstemmed SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
title_sort SOCIO-TERRITORIAL CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN BRAZIL
author Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e
author_facet Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e
Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig
Silva, Maina Pirajá
author_role author
author2 Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig
Silva, Maina Pirajá
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Sylvio Bandeira de Mello e
Silva, Barbara-Christine Nentwig
Silva, Maina Pirajá
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Capital socioterritorial
Desenvolvimento
Unidades da Federação
Regiões metropolitanas
Metrópoles
topic Capital socioterritorial
Desenvolvimento
Unidades da Federação
Regiões metropolitanas
Metrópoles
description This paper analyzes, based on data from 2010, the social organization in Brazil, measured by the distribution of Private Foundations and Non-Profit Associations (FASFIL), comparing them with the main socioeconomic indicators. The concept of socio-territorial capital is adopted, based on the notion of social capital (PUTNAM, 1996). This concept values the territorial networking, the bonds of cohesion and cooperation and the territorial rooting, that is, the interaction in different sectors and scales. An analysis is made for the relation between by FASFIL and GDP per capita for the Major Regions and for the Federation Units. The results confirm regional imbalances and interstate imbalances, that is, where there is more FASFIL income is higher. The analysis is also done for the main metropolitan regions and for the metropolises, now involving, in addition to GDP per capita, seven socioeconomic indicators (HDI, Gini index, Life expectancy at birth, Infant mortality, Persons with complete upper level, Percentage of vulnerable to poverty and Formalization of the employed). The results are more expressive than in the scale of the Federation Units, especially at the level of the metropolises, that is, they express more prominently the relation between FASFIL and socio territorial capital.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496
10.9771/1984-5537geo.v13i1.20496
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496
identifier_str_mv 10.9771/1984-5537geo.v13i1.20496
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/geotextos/article/view/20496/14740
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 GeoTextos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 GeoTextos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv GeoTextos; Vol. 13, N. 1 (julho de 2017)
1984-5537
1809-189X
10.9771/geo.v13i1
reponame:GeoTextos (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str GeoTextos (Online)
collection GeoTextos (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv GeoTextos (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv angeloserpa@hotmail.com||rodrigomei@hotmail.com
_version_ 1797221575602208768