Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT This study examined the quality of silage from two cultivars of energy cane (Saccharum spontaneum) produced with different additives. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with a 2×5 factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of two cultivars (VG3, VG1126) and four additives (1% urea; 1% NaOH; 1% CaO; and 1.0 × 1011 CFU g-1 of Lactobacillus plantarum- LP) + control, with eight replicates. Experimental mini-silos were used, which were opened 72 days after ensiling. The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, and silage degradability were. We identified significant interactions effect between cultivar and type of additive for DM, CP, EE, NDF. ADF. Organic and mineral matter percentage were similar between the two cultivars. LP was the least beneficial additive for DM degradation.After 72 h of fermentation, in vitro NDF degradation of cultivar VG3 increased due to urea, NaOH, and CaO, whereas degradation cultivar VG1126 decreased when inoculated with LP or CaO. The NaOH and CaO improved silage degradability thus improving its quality. The use of LP in the present study did not benefit silage for energy-cane cultivars. The use of NaOH and CaO improves the quality of the silage, two varieties of sugarcane energy VG3 and VG1126, enabling its use with better efficiency for animal feed. |
id |
UFBA-3_e9b28d46317b3a20f0e0115a86a7428e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1519-99402022000100200 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additiveschemical and microbial inoculumchemical compositionforage preservationin vitro degradabilityABSTRACT This study examined the quality of silage from two cultivars of energy cane (Saccharum spontaneum) produced with different additives. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with a 2×5 factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of two cultivars (VG3, VG1126) and four additives (1% urea; 1% NaOH; 1% CaO; and 1.0 × 1011 CFU g-1 of Lactobacillus plantarum- LP) + control, with eight replicates. Experimental mini-silos were used, which were opened 72 days after ensiling. The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, and silage degradability were. We identified significant interactions effect between cultivar and type of additive for DM, CP, EE, NDF. ADF. Organic and mineral matter percentage were similar between the two cultivars. LP was the least beneficial additive for DM degradation.After 72 h of fermentation, in vitro NDF degradation of cultivar VG3 increased due to urea, NaOH, and CaO, whereas degradation cultivar VG1126 decreased when inoculated with LP or CaO. The NaOH and CaO improved silage degradability thus improving its quality. The use of LP in the present study did not benefit silage for energy-cane cultivars. The use of NaOH and CaO improves the quality of the silage, two varieties of sugarcane energy VG3 and VG1126, enabling its use with better efficiency for animal feed.UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.23 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animalinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBA10.1590/s1519-9940202100432022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSILVA,Vanderli Luciano daFREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier deFRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de SouzaFERREIRA,Reginaldo NassarOLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães deLEANDRO,Wilson MozenaREBOUÇAS,Geovanne FerreiraSILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo eeng2022-02-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-99402022000100200Revistahttp://www.rbspa.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbspa@ufba.br1519-99401519-9940opendoar:2022-02-18T00:00Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
title |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
spellingShingle |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da chemical and microbial inoculum chemical composition forage preservation in vitro degradability |
title_short |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
title_full |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
title_fullStr |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
title_full_unstemmed |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
title_sort |
Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives |
author |
SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da |
author_facet |
SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
chemical and microbial inoculum chemical composition forage preservation in vitro degradability |
topic |
chemical and microbial inoculum chemical composition forage preservation in vitro degradability |
description |
ABSTRACT This study examined the quality of silage from two cultivars of energy cane (Saccharum spontaneum) produced with different additives. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with a 2×5 factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of two cultivars (VG3, VG1126) and four additives (1% urea; 1% NaOH; 1% CaO; and 1.0 × 1011 CFU g-1 of Lactobacillus plantarum- LP) + control, with eight replicates. Experimental mini-silos were used, which were opened 72 days after ensiling. The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, and silage degradability were. We identified significant interactions effect between cultivar and type of additive for DM, CP, EE, NDF. ADF. Organic and mineral matter percentage were similar between the two cultivars. LP was the least beneficial additive for DM degradation.After 72 h of fermentation, in vitro NDF degradation of cultivar VG3 increased due to urea, NaOH, and CaO, whereas degradation cultivar VG1126 decreased when inoculated with LP or CaO. The NaOH and CaO improved silage degradability thus improving its quality. The use of LP in the present study did not benefit silage for energy-cane cultivars. The use of NaOH and CaO improves the quality of the silage, two varieties of sugarcane energy VG3 and VG1126, enabling its use with better efficiency for animal feed. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1519-9940202100432022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.23 2022 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rbspa@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1750297509060673536 |