Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de, FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza, FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar, OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de, LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena, REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira, SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200
Resumo: ABSTRACT This study examined the quality of silage from two cultivars of energy cane (Saccharum spontaneum) produced with different additives. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with a 2×5 factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of two cultivars (VG3, VG1126) and four additives (1% urea; 1% NaOH; 1% CaO; and 1.0 × 1011 CFU g-1 of Lactobacillus plantarum- LP) + control, with eight replicates. Experimental mini-silos were used, which were opened 72 days after ensiling. The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, and silage degradability were. We identified significant interactions effect between cultivar and type of additive for DM, CP, EE, NDF. ADF. Organic and mineral matter percentage were similar between the two cultivars. LP was the least beneficial additive for DM degradation.After 72 h of fermentation, in vitro NDF degradation of cultivar VG3 increased due to urea, NaOH, and CaO, whereas degradation cultivar VG1126 decreased when inoculated with LP or CaO. The NaOH and CaO improved silage degradability thus improving its quality. The use of LP in the present study did not benefit silage for energy-cane cultivars. The use of NaOH and CaO improves the quality of the silage, two varieties of sugarcane energy VG3 and VG1126, enabling its use with better efficiency for animal feed.
id UFBA-3_e9b28d46317b3a20f0e0115a86a7428e
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1519-99402022000100200
network_acronym_str UFBA-3
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository_id_str
spelling Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additiveschemical and microbial inoculumchemical compositionforage preservationin vitro degradabilityABSTRACT This study examined the quality of silage from two cultivars of energy cane (Saccharum spontaneum) produced with different additives. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with a 2×5 factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of two cultivars (VG3, VG1126) and four additives (1% urea; 1% NaOH; 1% CaO; and 1.0 × 1011 CFU g-1 of Lactobacillus plantarum- LP) + control, with eight replicates. Experimental mini-silos were used, which were opened 72 days after ensiling. The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, and silage degradability were. We identified significant interactions effect between cultivar and type of additive for DM, CP, EE, NDF. ADF. Organic and mineral matter percentage were similar between the two cultivars. LP was the least beneficial additive for DM degradation.After 72 h of fermentation, in vitro NDF degradation of cultivar VG3 increased due to urea, NaOH, and CaO, whereas degradation cultivar VG1126 decreased when inoculated with LP or CaO. The NaOH and CaO improved silage degradability thus improving its quality. The use of LP in the present study did not benefit silage for energy-cane cultivars. The use of NaOH and CaO improves the quality of the silage, two varieties of sugarcane energy VG3 and VG1126, enabling its use with better efficiency for animal feed.UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.23 2022reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animalinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBA10.1590/s1519-9940202100432022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSILVA,Vanderli Luciano daFREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier deFRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de SouzaFERREIRA,Reginaldo NassarOLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães deLEANDRO,Wilson MozenaREBOUÇAS,Geovanne FerreiraSILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo eeng2022-02-18T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1519-99402022000100200Revistahttp://www.rbspa.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rbspa@ufba.br1519-99401519-9940opendoar:2022-02-18T00:00Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
title Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
spellingShingle Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da
chemical and microbial inoculum
chemical composition
forage preservation
in vitro degradability
title_short Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
title_full Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
title_fullStr Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
title_full_unstemmed Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
title_sort Silage Quality of two energy-cane cultivars produced with different additives
author SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da
author_facet SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da
FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de
FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza
FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar
OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de
LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena
REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira
SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e
author_role author
author2 FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de
FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza
FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar
OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de
LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena
REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira
SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv SILVA,Vanderli Luciano da
FREITAS,Paulo Vitor Divino Xavier de
FRANÇA,Aldi Fernandes de Souza
FERREIRA,Reginaldo Nassar
OLIVEIRA,Leonardo Guimarães de
LEANDRO,Wilson Mozena
REBOUÇAS,Geovanne Ferreira
SILVA NETO,Carlos de Melo e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv chemical and microbial inoculum
chemical composition
forage preservation
in vitro degradability
topic chemical and microbial inoculum
chemical composition
forage preservation
in vitro degradability
description ABSTRACT This study examined the quality of silage from two cultivars of energy cane (Saccharum spontaneum) produced with different additives. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design with a 2×5 factorial arrangement of treatments consisting of two cultivars (VG3, VG1126) and four additives (1% urea; 1% NaOH; 1% CaO; and 1.0 × 1011 CFU g-1 of Lactobacillus plantarum- LP) + control, with eight replicates. Experimental mini-silos were used, which were opened 72 days after ensiling. The dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) contents, and silage degradability were. We identified significant interactions effect between cultivar and type of additive for DM, CP, EE, NDF. ADF. Organic and mineral matter percentage were similar between the two cultivars. LP was the least beneficial additive for DM degradation.After 72 h of fermentation, in vitro NDF degradation of cultivar VG3 increased due to urea, NaOH, and CaO, whereas degradation cultivar VG1126 decreased when inoculated with LP or CaO. The NaOH and CaO improved silage degradability thus improving its quality. The use of LP in the present study did not benefit silage for energy-cane cultivars. The use of NaOH and CaO improves the quality of the silage, two varieties of sugarcane energy VG3 and VG1126, enabling its use with better efficiency for animal feed.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1519-99402022000100200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1519-9940202100432022
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFBA - Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal v.23 2022
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
collection Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rbspa@ufba.br
_version_ 1750297509060673536