Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcelino, Carolina Wünsch
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Samir Adamoglu de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
por
Título da fonte: Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455
Resumo: This study aims to identify strategic responses in the official statements issued by the group of political agents mentioned on "Fachin's List". These statements in response to corruption accusations comprise a mediatized corpus of secondary data that was investigated using interpretive discourse analysis. This study uses an institutionalist approach to the political context considering the complexity and plurality of the institutional sphere, in which each voter is an interlocutor of political discourse. This study also included analyses on how the discursive constructions are formed using intertextual, rhetorical, ambiguous and semantic elements. The results outline five distinct strategies in the official notes, which apply both to individuals as well as organizations: (a) attack by expressing consternation; (b) empathy for supporting anti-corruption actions; (c) manipulation by projecting a political ethos; (d) manipulation by revoking legitimacy; and (e) an adaptive posture in raising ambiguity – contributing to reflection and assessment of reactive behaviors of individuals and organizations in situations of crisis, scandals, guiltiness and corruption.
id UFBA-4_556b9401eb6fe13cb41df357623e39a7
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/26455
network_acronym_str UFBA-4
network_name_str Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption ScandalsAtacar, Anuir ou Defender? Respostas (Políticas) Estratégicas em Escândalos de Corrupçãostrategic responseslanguagecorruptiondiscourse analysis.respostas estratégicaslinguagemcorrupçãoanálise do discurso.This study aims to identify strategic responses in the official statements issued by the group of political agents mentioned on "Fachin's List". These statements in response to corruption accusations comprise a mediatized corpus of secondary data that was investigated using interpretive discourse analysis. This study uses an institutionalist approach to the political context considering the complexity and plurality of the institutional sphere, in which each voter is an interlocutor of political discourse. This study also included analyses on how the discursive constructions are formed using intertextual, rhetorical, ambiguous and semantic elements. The results outline five distinct strategies in the official notes, which apply both to individuals as well as organizations: (a) attack by expressing consternation; (b) empathy for supporting anti-corruption actions; (c) manipulation by projecting a political ethos; (d) manipulation by revoking legitimacy; and (e) an adaptive posture in raising ambiguity – contributing to reflection and assessment of reactive behaviors of individuals and organizations in situations of crisis, scandals, guiltiness and corruption.Este estudo objetiva identificar respostas estratégicas nas notas oficiais proferidas pelo rol de agentes políticos citados na “lista de Fachin”. As notas em resposta às acusações de corrupção compõem um corpus de dados secundários, de divulgação midiática, submetido à análise do discurso de fulcro interpretativista. Priorizou-se o olhar institucionalista sobre o contexto político, que considera a complexidade e a pluralidade da esfera institucional, em que cada eleitor é interlocutor do discurso político. Ao mesmo tempo, analisa-se de que forma as construções discursivas são formatadas com o uso de elementos intertextuais, retóricos, ambíguos e semânticos. Como resultado, identificaram-se cinco estratégias distintas de resposta nas notas oficiais, aplicáveis a indivíduos e organizações: (a) o ataque pela expressão de consternação; (b) a empatia pelo apoio às ações anticorrupção; (c) a manipulação ao projetar o ethos político; (d) a manipulação ao revogar legitimidade; e (e) a postura adaptativa ao suscitar ambiguidade – contribuindo para reflexão e avaliação de comportamentos reativos de indivíduos e organizações em situações de crise, escândalos, culpabilidade e corrupção.Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA2021-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 28 No. 96 (2021)Organizações & Sociedade; v. 28 n. 96 (2021)1984-92301413-585Xreponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAengporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455/24534https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455/24535Copyright (c) 2021 Organizações & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMarcelino, Carolina WünschOliveira, Samir Adamoglu de2021-06-16T10:19:51Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/26455Revistahttp://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcandidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br1984-92301413-585Xopendoar:2021-06-16T10:19:51Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
Atacar, Anuir ou Defender? Respostas (Políticas) Estratégicas em Escândalos de Corrupção
title Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
spellingShingle Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
Marcelino, Carolina Wünsch
strategic responses
language
corruption
discourse analysis.
respostas estratégicas
linguagem
corrupção
análise do discurso.
title_short Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
title_full Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
title_fullStr Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
title_full_unstemmed Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
title_sort Attack, Assent or Defend? Strategic (Political) Responses to Corruption Scandals
author Marcelino, Carolina Wünsch
author_facet Marcelino, Carolina Wünsch
Oliveira, Samir Adamoglu de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Samir Adamoglu de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcelino, Carolina Wünsch
Oliveira, Samir Adamoglu de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv strategic responses
language
corruption
discourse analysis.
respostas estratégicas
linguagem
corrupção
análise do discurso.
topic strategic responses
language
corruption
discourse analysis.
respostas estratégicas
linguagem
corrupção
análise do discurso.
description This study aims to identify strategic responses in the official statements issued by the group of political agents mentioned on "Fachin's List". These statements in response to corruption accusations comprise a mediatized corpus of secondary data that was investigated using interpretive discourse analysis. This study uses an institutionalist approach to the political context considering the complexity and plurality of the institutional sphere, in which each voter is an interlocutor of political discourse. This study also included analyses on how the discursive constructions are formed using intertextual, rhetorical, ambiguous and semantic elements. The results outline five distinct strategies in the official notes, which apply both to individuals as well as organizations: (a) attack by expressing consternation; (b) empathy for supporting anti-corruption actions; (c) manipulation by projecting a political ethos; (d) manipulation by revoking legitimacy; and (e) an adaptive posture in raising ambiguity – contributing to reflection and assessment of reactive behaviors of individuals and organizations in situations of crisis, scandals, guiltiness and corruption.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
por
language eng
por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455/24534
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/26455/24535
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Organizações & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Organizações & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 28 No. 96 (2021)
Organizações & Sociedade; v. 28 n. 96 (2021)
1984-9230
1413-585X
reponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
collection Organizações & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv candidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br
_version_ 1799698970947092480

Registros relacionados