Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285 |
Resumo: | This study aims to contribute to the literature on public administration by conducting epistemological research on the main trends in the field, updating them with the Circle of Epistemic Matrices proposed by Paes de Paula (2016). For this, (a) it starts from the essay written by Andion (2012), which carried out a critical study on the trajectory of the field of public administration in Brazil and the different theoretical lines that compose it, based on the paradigms model built by Burrell and Morgan (1979); and (b) it analyzes the main lines that compose the field of public administration, called State-centric, Pluralist, New Public Administration New Public Service, and Digital Era Governance, in light of the Circle of Epistemic Matrices proposed by Paes de Paula. As results, it confirms that functionalist sociological approaches have a strong influence on the field of public administration. Greater dialogue is suggested between the lines that compose the field and the development of new matrix propositions – giving special attention to the digital transformation driven by Digital Era Governance and by the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-) health crisis – taking into account that the instrumental rational logic is insufficient to explain the phenomena of the reality, even if it is needed for streamlining public goods and interests. Finally, reflections are presented along with an agenda for future research. |
id |
UFBA-4_5e792ac8723c6ccd80b4c240a78dbe38 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/44285 |
network_acronym_str |
UFBA-4 |
network_name_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic MatricesPossibilidades Epistemológicas das Teorias da Administração Pública: de Paradigmas a Matrizes Epistêmicasadministração públicaparadigmasmatrizes epistêmicaspublic administrationparadigmsepistemic matricesThis study aims to contribute to the literature on public administration by conducting epistemological research on the main trends in the field, updating them with the Circle of Epistemic Matrices proposed by Paes de Paula (2016). For this, (a) it starts from the essay written by Andion (2012), which carried out a critical study on the trajectory of the field of public administration in Brazil and the different theoretical lines that compose it, based on the paradigms model built by Burrell and Morgan (1979); and (b) it analyzes the main lines that compose the field of public administration, called State-centric, Pluralist, New Public Administration New Public Service, and Digital Era Governance, in light of the Circle of Epistemic Matrices proposed by Paes de Paula. As results, it confirms that functionalist sociological approaches have a strong influence on the field of public administration. Greater dialogue is suggested between the lines that compose the field and the development of new matrix propositions – giving special attention to the digital transformation driven by Digital Era Governance and by the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-) health crisis – taking into account that the instrumental rational logic is insufficient to explain the phenomena of the reality, even if it is needed for streamlining public goods and interests. Finally, reflections are presented along with an agenda for future research. O objetivo deste trabalho é contribuir com a literatura sobre administração pública ao realizar um estudo epistemológico das principais correntes do campo, atualizando-as com o Círculo das Matrizes Epistêmicas proposto por Paes de Paula (2016). Para isso, (a) parte-se do ensaio realizado por Andion (2012), que realiza um estudo crítico sobre a trajetória do campo da administração pública no Brasil e as diferentes correntes teóricas que o compõem, com base no modelo de paradigmas construído por Burrell e Morgan (1979); (b) analisam-se as principais correntes que compõem o campo da administração pública, denominadas Estadocêntrica; Pluralista; Nova Administração Pública, Novo Serviço Público e Digital-Era Governance à luz do Círculo das Matrizes Epistêmicas proposto por Paes de Paula. Como resultados, confirma-se que abordagens sociológicas funcionalistas possuem forte influência no campo da administração pública. Sugere-se maior diálogo entre as correntes que compõem o campo e o desenvolvimento de novas proposições de matrizes – em atenção especial à transformação digital impulsionada pela Digital-Era Governance e pela crise sanitária do novo coronavírus (SARS-CoV-) – levando-se em consideração que a lógica racional instrumental é insuficiente para explicar os fenômenos da realidade, mesmo que necessária para a racionalização dos bens e interesses públicos. Por fim, apresentam-se reflexões e agenda para pesquisas futuras. Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA2022-05-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 29 No. 101 (2022)Organizações & Sociedade; v. 29 n. 101 (2022)1984-92301413-585Xreponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAengporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285/26786https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285/26798Copyright (c) 2022 Organizações & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Patrícia AraújoBatista-dos-Santos, Ana Cristina2022-05-10T01:44:09Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/44285Revistahttp://www.revistaoes.ufba.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcandidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br1984-92301413-585Xopendoar:2022-05-10T01:44:09Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices Possibilidades Epistemológicas das Teorias da Administração Pública: de Paradigmas a Matrizes Epistêmicas |
title |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices |
spellingShingle |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices Silva, Patrícia Araújo administração pública paradigmas matrizes epistêmicas public administration paradigms epistemic matrices |
title_short |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices |
title_full |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices |
title_fullStr |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices |
title_sort |
Epistemological Possibilities of Public Administration Theories: from Paradigms to Epistemic Matrices |
author |
Silva, Patrícia Araújo |
author_facet |
Silva, Patrícia Araújo Batista-dos-Santos, Ana Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Batista-dos-Santos, Ana Cristina |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Patrícia Araújo Batista-dos-Santos, Ana Cristina |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
administração pública paradigmas matrizes epistêmicas public administration paradigms epistemic matrices |
topic |
administração pública paradigmas matrizes epistêmicas public administration paradigms epistemic matrices |
description |
This study aims to contribute to the literature on public administration by conducting epistemological research on the main trends in the field, updating them with the Circle of Epistemic Matrices proposed by Paes de Paula (2016). For this, (a) it starts from the essay written by Andion (2012), which carried out a critical study on the trajectory of the field of public administration in Brazil and the different theoretical lines that compose it, based on the paradigms model built by Burrell and Morgan (1979); and (b) it analyzes the main lines that compose the field of public administration, called State-centric, Pluralist, New Public Administration New Public Service, and Digital Era Governance, in light of the Circle of Epistemic Matrices proposed by Paes de Paula. As results, it confirms that functionalist sociological approaches have a strong influence on the field of public administration. Greater dialogue is suggested between the lines that compose the field and the development of new matrix propositions – giving special attention to the digital transformation driven by Digital Era Governance and by the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-) health crisis – taking into account that the instrumental rational logic is insufficient to explain the phenomena of the reality, even if it is needed for streamlining public goods and interests. Finally, reflections are presented along with an agenda for future research. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285/26786 https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/revistaoes/article/view/44285/26798 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Organizações & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Organizações & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Núcleo de Pós-graduação em Administração, Escola de Administração, UFBA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade; Vol. 29 No. 101 (2022) Organizações & Sociedade; v. 29 n. 101 (2022) 1984-9230 1413-585X reponame:Organizações & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) instacron:UFBA |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
instacron_str |
UFBA |
institution |
UFBA |
reponame_str |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Organizações & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
candidab@ufba.br||revistaoes@ufba.br |
_version_ |
1799698971337162752 |