FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Testa, Graziella
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Mesquita, Lara, Bolognesi, Bruno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Caderno CRH
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55537
Resumo: The article analyzes the results of the 2017 political reform in Brazil, which aimed to penalize parties with a clientelistic behavior. The study adopts the “centrão 2.0” approach, a group united around clientelist demands, relegating the ideological agenda. Three sets of data were used: a questionnaire answered by political scientists, career data of parliamentarians, and information about the behavior of party caucuses in the Chamber. The most clientelistic parties in the legislative arena exhibit the same behavior in the electoral arena, including PSD, Pode, PP, and Republicanos (Republicanos). The reforms of 2007 and 2017 are analyzed, with emphasis on the performance clause created in 2017. Smaller parties were more negatively affected, while medium-sized parties within the centrão benefited from absorbing resources that were previously destined for the smaller parties. The conclusion suggests that the reform, by reducing the number of smaller clientelistic parties, thickened resources and power in medium-sized parties with similar behavior. This reinforces the idea that reforms in democracies tend to favor the elites.
id UFBA-7_273ca496909425637eaab202b8c4b586
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/55537
network_acronym_str UFBA-7
network_name_str Caderno CRH
repository_id_str
spelling FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0DE LA PRATIQUE DU CLIENTÉLISME AU CENTRE DU POUVOIR: réformes électorales et le centrão 2.0DO FISIOLOGISMO AO CENTRO DO PODER: as reformas eleitorais e o centrão 2.0Centrão Reforma eleitoral;FisiologismoPartidosClientelismoCentrãoElectoral reformClientelismPartiesPatronageCentrão Réforme électoraleClientélismePartisThe article analyzes the results of the 2017 political reform in Brazil, which aimed to penalize parties with a clientelistic behavior. The study adopts the “centrão 2.0” approach, a group united around clientelist demands, relegating the ideological agenda. Three sets of data were used: a questionnaire answered by political scientists, career data of parliamentarians, and information about the behavior of party caucuses in the Chamber. The most clientelistic parties in the legislative arena exhibit the same behavior in the electoral arena, including PSD, Pode, PP, and Republicanos (Republicanos). The reforms of 2007 and 2017 are analyzed, with emphasis on the performance clause created in 2017. Smaller parties were more negatively affected, while medium-sized parties within the centrão benefited from absorbing resources that were previously destined for the smaller parties. The conclusion suggests that the reform, by reducing the number of smaller clientelistic parties, thickened resources and power in medium-sized parties with similar behavior. This reinforces the idea that reforms in democracies tend to favor the elites.L’article analyse les résultats de la réforme politique de 2017 au Brésil, qui visait à sanctionner les partis adoptant un comportement clientéliste. L’étude utilise l’approche du «centrão 2.0», un groupe uni autour de demandes clientélistes, reléguant l’agenda idéologique. Trois ensembles de données ont été utilisés : un questionnaire rempli par des scientifiques politiques, des données de carrière des parlementaires et des informations sur le comportement des groupes parlementaires des partis à la Chambre. Les partis les plus clientélistes dans l’arène législative répètent le même comportement dans l’arène électorale, notamment le PSD, le Pode, le PP et le Republicanos (Republicanos). Les réformes de 2007 et de 2017 sont analysées, avec une mise en évidence de la clause de performance créée en 2017. Les petits partis ont été plus durement touchés, tandis que les partis de taille moyenne au sein du centrão ont bénéficié de l’absorption de ressources qui étaient auparavant destinées aux plus petits partis. La conclusion suggère que la réforme, en réduisant le nombre de petits partis clientélistes, a concentré les ressources et le pouvoir dans les partis de taille moyenne présentant des comportements similaires. Cela renforce l’idée que les réformes dans les démocraties ont tendance à favoriser les élites.Este artigo analisa os resultados da reforma política de 2017 no Brasil, que buscou punir partidos com comportamento fisiológico. O estudo utiliza a abordagem do “centrão 2.0”, grupo aglutinado em torno de demandas clientelistas, relegando a agenda ideológica. Foram utilizados três conjuntos de dados: um questionário respondido por cientistas políticos, dados de carreira dos parlamentares e informações sobre o comportamento das bancadas partidárias na Câmara. Os partidos mais fisiológicos na arena legislativa repetem o mesmo comportamento na arena eleitoral, incluindo o Partido Social Democrático (PSD), o Podemos (Pode), o Partido Progressistas (PP) e o Republicanos (Republicanos). As reformas de 2007 e 2017 são analisadas, com destaque para a cláusula de desempenho criada em 2017. Os partidos menores foram mais impactados negativamente, enquanto partidos médios do centrão se beneficiaram ao absorver recursos antes destinados aos menores. A conclusão aponta que a reforma, ao reduzir o número de partidos menores fisiológicos, concentrou recursos e poder nos partidos médios com comportamento semelhante. Isso reforça a ideia de que reformas em democracias tendem a favorecer as elites.Universidade Federal da Bahia2024-05-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionFrom Patronage to the Center of Power: Electoral Reforms and Centrão 2.0 De la pratique du clientélisme au centre du pouvoir : Réformes électorales et le centrão 2.0Artigo avaliado pelos paresTítulo: Do fisiologismo ao centro do poder: as reformas eleitorais e o centrão 2.0application/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/5553710.9771/ccrh.v37i0.55537Caderno CRH; v. 37 (2024): Publicação Contínua; e0240031983-82390103-4979reponame:Caderno CRHinstname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)instacron:UFBAporhttps://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55537/32608http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTesta, GraziellaMesquita, Lara Bolognesi, Bruno2024-05-13T17:55:28Zoai:ojs.periodicos.ufba.br:article/55537Revistahttps://portalseer.ufba.br/index.php/crh/about/editorialPolicies#custom-0PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevcrh@ufba.br||revcrh@ufba.br1983-82390103-4979opendoar:2024-05-13T17:55:28Caderno CRH - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
DE LA PRATIQUE DU CLIENTÉLISME AU CENTRE DU POUVOIR: réformes électorales et le centrão 2.0
DO FISIOLOGISMO AO CENTRO DO PODER: as reformas eleitorais e o centrão 2.0
title FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
spellingShingle FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
Testa, Graziella
Centrão
Reforma eleitoral;
Fisiologismo
Partidos
Clientelismo
Centrão
Electoral reform
Clientelism
Parties
Patronage
Centrão
Réforme électorale
Clientélisme
Partis
title_short FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
title_full FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
title_fullStr FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
title_full_unstemmed FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
title_sort FROM PATRONAGE TO THE CENTER OF POWER: electoral reforms and centrão 2.0
author Testa, Graziella
author_facet Testa, Graziella
Mesquita, Lara
Bolognesi, Bruno
author_role author
author2 Mesquita, Lara
Bolognesi, Bruno
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Testa, Graziella
Mesquita, Lara
Bolognesi, Bruno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Centrão
Reforma eleitoral;
Fisiologismo
Partidos
Clientelismo
Centrão
Electoral reform
Clientelism
Parties
Patronage
Centrão
Réforme électorale
Clientélisme
Partis
topic Centrão
Reforma eleitoral;
Fisiologismo
Partidos
Clientelismo
Centrão
Electoral reform
Clientelism
Parties
Patronage
Centrão
Réforme électorale
Clientélisme
Partis
description The article analyzes the results of the 2017 political reform in Brazil, which aimed to penalize parties with a clientelistic behavior. The study adopts the “centrão 2.0” approach, a group united around clientelist demands, relegating the ideological agenda. Three sets of data were used: a questionnaire answered by political scientists, career data of parliamentarians, and information about the behavior of party caucuses in the Chamber. The most clientelistic parties in the legislative arena exhibit the same behavior in the electoral arena, including PSD, Pode, PP, and Republicanos (Republicanos). The reforms of 2007 and 2017 are analyzed, with emphasis on the performance clause created in 2017. Smaller parties were more negatively affected, while medium-sized parties within the centrão benefited from absorbing resources that were previously destined for the smaller parties. The conclusion suggests that the reform, by reducing the number of smaller clientelistic parties, thickened resources and power in medium-sized parties with similar behavior. This reinforces the idea that reforms in democracies tend to favor the elites.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-05-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
From Patronage to the Center of Power: Electoral Reforms and Centrão 2.0
De la pratique du clientélisme au centre du pouvoir : Réformes électorales et le centrão 2.0
Artigo avaliado pelos pares
Título: Do fisiologismo ao centro do poder: as reformas eleitorais e o centrão 2.0
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55537
10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.55537
url https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55537
identifier_str_mv 10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.55537
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/crh/article/view/55537/32608
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal da Bahia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Caderno CRH; v. 37 (2024): Publicação Contínua; e024003
1983-8239
0103-4979
reponame:Caderno CRH
instname:Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron:UFBA
instname_str Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
instacron_str UFBA
institution UFBA
reponame_str Caderno CRH
collection Caderno CRH
repository.name.fl_str_mv Caderno CRH - Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revcrh@ufba.br||revcrh@ufba.br
_version_ 1799699056928227328