PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reitemeyer, Ursula
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Dialectus
Texto Completo: http://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/article/view/5209
Resumo: The period between 1830 (July Revolution in France) and 1848 (March Revolution in Germany) is not only a period of political upheavals, not only the beginning of the so called Industrial Revolution in Germany, but also an extraordinary philosophical era characterized by Hegel’s scholars. The so called Vormärzphilosophie (pre-March philosophy) was dominated by two different schools of Hegelianism. There was one faction which saw in the continuation of Hegel’s speculative system philosophy the intellectual fundament of a modern constitutional state. On the other side stood those “philosophers of the future” like the brothers Ludwig and Friedrich Feuerbach or Karl Marx who worked on a complete break with Hegel’s system of science because of its theological roots. Going back to the idea of an absolute spirit meant from this perspective going back to a non-enlightened school of thinking. The philosophy of future was a philosophy with a strong practical accent as Marx had put into words in his 11th thesis on Feuerbach. First step of this practical program was the secularization, which was first of all an educational program, since the church (theological faculties) educated the teachers, wrote the school books and prevented any enlightenment of the people. In the consequence people were not only treated as bad sinners, but also as eternal subject with no right of political participation. So the break with Hegel and the Hegelian theory of a Christian state opened the door to a united and democratic Germany. The way to democracy and unity was long. It took – seen from 1848 – 100 years to give Germany a lasting constitution and 140 years to unite.
id UFC-11_339b9a20abdb6268e1468f980b1a34c0
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/5209
network_acronym_str UFC-11
network_name_str Revista Dialectus
repository_id_str
spelling PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZThe period between 1830 (July Revolution in France) and 1848 (March Revolution in Germany) is not only a period of political upheavals, not only the beginning of the so called Industrial Revolution in Germany, but also an extraordinary philosophical era characterized by Hegel’s scholars. The so called Vormärzphilosophie (pre-March philosophy) was dominated by two different schools of Hegelianism. There was one faction which saw in the continuation of Hegel’s speculative system philosophy the intellectual fundament of a modern constitutional state. On the other side stood those “philosophers of the future” like the brothers Ludwig and Friedrich Feuerbach or Karl Marx who worked on a complete break with Hegel’s system of science because of its theological roots. Going back to the idea of an absolute spirit meant from this perspective going back to a non-enlightened school of thinking. The philosophy of future was a philosophy with a strong practical accent as Marx had put into words in his 11th thesis on Feuerbach. First step of this practical program was the secularization, which was first of all an educational program, since the church (theological faculties) educated the teachers, wrote the school books and prevented any enlightenment of the people. In the consequence people were not only treated as bad sinners, but also as eternal subject with no right of political participation. So the break with Hegel and the Hegelian theory of a Christian state opened the door to a united and democratic Germany. The way to democracy and unity was long. It took – seen from 1848 – 100 years to give Germany a lasting constitution and 140 years to unite.Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)2016-10-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/article/view/520910.30611/2015n6id5209Revista Dialectus - Revista de Filosofia; n. 6 (2015): Dossiê Ludwig Feuerbach: Antropologia e Ética2317-201010.30611/2015n6reponame:Revista Dialectusinstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/article/view/5209/3841Reitemeyer, Ursulainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-06-15T01:44:24Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/5209Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectusPUBhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/oaidialectus@ufc.br||ef.chagas@uol.com.br||revistadialectus@yahoo.com2317-20102317-2010opendoar:2020-06-15T01:44:24Revista Dialectus - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
title PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
spellingShingle PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
Reitemeyer, Ursula
title_short PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
title_full PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
title_fullStr PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
title_full_unstemmed PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
title_sort PHILOSOPHIE DER ZUKUNFT ODER EINE ZUKUNFT OHNE PHILOSOPHIE? LUDWIG FEUERBACHS PRAKTISCHE PHILOSOPHIE IM SPIEGEL DES REVOLUTIONÄREN VORMÄRZ
author Reitemeyer, Ursula
author_facet Reitemeyer, Ursula
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reitemeyer, Ursula
description The period between 1830 (July Revolution in France) and 1848 (March Revolution in Germany) is not only a period of political upheavals, not only the beginning of the so called Industrial Revolution in Germany, but also an extraordinary philosophical era characterized by Hegel’s scholars. The so called Vormärzphilosophie (pre-March philosophy) was dominated by two different schools of Hegelianism. There was one faction which saw in the continuation of Hegel’s speculative system philosophy the intellectual fundament of a modern constitutional state. On the other side stood those “philosophers of the future” like the brothers Ludwig and Friedrich Feuerbach or Karl Marx who worked on a complete break with Hegel’s system of science because of its theological roots. Going back to the idea of an absolute spirit meant from this perspective going back to a non-enlightened school of thinking. The philosophy of future was a philosophy with a strong practical accent as Marx had put into words in his 11th thesis on Feuerbach. First step of this practical program was the secularization, which was first of all an educational program, since the church (theological faculties) educated the teachers, wrote the school books and prevented any enlightenment of the people. In the consequence people were not only treated as bad sinners, but also as eternal subject with no right of political participation. So the break with Hegel and the Hegelian theory of a Christian state opened the door to a united and democratic Germany. The way to democracy and unity was long. It took – seen from 1848 – 100 years to give Germany a lasting constitution and 140 years to unite.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/article/view/5209
10.30611/2015n6id5209
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/article/view/5209
identifier_str_mv 10.30611/2015n6id5209
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/dialectus/article/view/5209/3841
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Dialectus - Revista de Filosofia; n. 6 (2015): Dossiê Ludwig Feuerbach: Antropologia e Ética
2317-2010
10.30611/2015n6
reponame:Revista Dialectus
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista Dialectus
collection Revista Dialectus
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Dialectus - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dialectus@ufc.br||ef.chagas@uol.com.br||revistadialectus@yahoo.com
_version_ 1814253406324260864