Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Scotti, Sérgio
Data de Publicação: 2013
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online)
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/121
Resumo: The article explores the thesis of Lacan, that the only thing one can be blamed, at least from an analytical perspective, is to have yielded to his desire. It questions what was the desire Lacan talked about. Was it the same sexual desire that Freud also spoke? It states that sexual desire, as Freud and Lacan showed us, is always contentious, since their first objects are prohibited. Desire can cause distress, every desire involves, in its origin, something denied by the subject. From this point the author continues to ask why Lacan tells us we can be blamed for yielding to desire if we refuse to some extent this desire? The answer is that we are responsible for it, even if this desire is unconscious. This means to say that the unconscious is part of us and that perhaps it is even our very essence. The author calls also attention to the fact that since the invention of psychoanalysis, Freud put us facing a reality that definitely changes the conception we have of man and his ethical dimension. It concludes that, since Freud, the man is confronted by the fact that he is no longer sovereign in his own home and he doesn’t own his deeper motives and that can be mistaken in what concerns the meaning of his actions and that according to Lacan, the judgment that man makes of his actions can not fail to consider the question of desire, even if it is unconscious.
id UFC-13_bac403c468727a87c611049528bbb330
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/121
network_acronym_str UFC-13
network_name_str Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desirePsicanálise: uma ética do desejoPsychoanalysisunconsciousdesireethics.Psicanáliseinconscientedesejoética.The article explores the thesis of Lacan, that the only thing one can be blamed, at least from an analytical perspective, is to have yielded to his desire. It questions what was the desire Lacan talked about. Was it the same sexual desire that Freud also spoke? It states that sexual desire, as Freud and Lacan showed us, is always contentious, since their first objects are prohibited. Desire can cause distress, every desire involves, in its origin, something denied by the subject. From this point the author continues to ask why Lacan tells us we can be blamed for yielding to desire if we refuse to some extent this desire? The answer is that we are responsible for it, even if this desire is unconscious. This means to say that the unconscious is part of us and that perhaps it is even our very essence. The author calls also attention to the fact that since the invention of psychoanalysis, Freud put us facing a reality that definitely changes the conception we have of man and his ethical dimension. It concludes that, since Freud, the man is confronted by the fact that he is no longer sovereign in his own home and he doesn’t own his deeper motives and that can be mistaken in what concerns the meaning of his actions and that according to Lacan, the judgment that man makes of his actions can not fail to consider the question of desire, even if it is unconscious.O artigo explora e analisa a tese de Lacan, segundo a qual a única coisa da qual se pode ser culpado, pelo menos da perspectiva analítica, é de ter cedido de seu desejo. Indaga de que desejo falava Lacan. Seria o desejo sexual de que também falava Freud? Afirma que o desejo sexual, como Freud e Lacan nos mostraram, é sempre conflituoso, na medida em que seus primeiros objetos são proibidos. O desejo pode provocar angústia, todo desejo na sua origem comporta algo de recusado pelo sujeito. A partir disso continua a indagar por que Lacan nos diz que podemos ser culpados por ceder de nosso desejo se nós próprios recusamos em alguma medida esse desejo? Responde que somos responsáveis por ele, mesmo que ele seja inconsciente. Isso significa dizer que o inconsciente faz parte de nós e que, talvez, ele seja mesmo a nossa própria essência. Chama, ainda, a atenção para o fato de que desde a invenção da Psicanálise, Freud nos colocou diante de uma realidade que altera definitivamente a concepção que temos do homem e de sua dimensão ética. Conclui que, a partir de Freud, o homem se vê diante do fato de que não é soberano dentro de sua própria casa, que não é dono de seus motivos mais profundos e de que pode se enganar quanto ao sentido de suas ações e que, segundo Lacan, o juízo que o homem faz de suas ações não pode mais deixar de considerar a questão do desejo, mesmo que ele seja inconsciente.Universidade Federal do Ceará2013-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/121Journal of Psychology; v.3, n.2, 2012 (julho-dezembro); 56-60Revista de Psicologia; v.3, n.2, 2012 (julho-dezembro); 56-602179-17400102-1222reponame:Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/121/99427Scotti, Sérgioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-10-08T18:17:21Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/121Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/index.php/psicologiaufcPUBhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/index.php/psicologiaufc/oairevpsico@ufc.br||2179-17402179-1740opendoar:2019-10-08T18:17:21Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
Psicanálise: uma ética do desejo
title Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
spellingShingle Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
Scotti, Sérgio
Psychoanalysis
unconscious
desire
ethics.
Psicanálise
inconsciente
desejo
ética.
title_short Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
title_full Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
title_fullStr Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
title_full_unstemmed Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
title_sort Psychoanalysis: an ethics of desire
author Scotti, Sérgio
author_facet Scotti, Sérgio
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Scotti, Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psychoanalysis
unconscious
desire
ethics.
Psicanálise
inconsciente
desejo
ética.
topic Psychoanalysis
unconscious
desire
ethics.
Psicanálise
inconsciente
desejo
ética.
description The article explores the thesis of Lacan, that the only thing one can be blamed, at least from an analytical perspective, is to have yielded to his desire. It questions what was the desire Lacan talked about. Was it the same sexual desire that Freud also spoke? It states that sexual desire, as Freud and Lacan showed us, is always contentious, since their first objects are prohibited. Desire can cause distress, every desire involves, in its origin, something denied by the subject. From this point the author continues to ask why Lacan tells us we can be blamed for yielding to desire if we refuse to some extent this desire? The answer is that we are responsible for it, even if this desire is unconscious. This means to say that the unconscious is part of us and that perhaps it is even our very essence. The author calls also attention to the fact that since the invention of psychoanalysis, Freud put us facing a reality that definitely changes the conception we have of man and his ethical dimension. It concludes that, since Freud, the man is confronted by the fact that he is no longer sovereign in his own home and he doesn’t own his deeper motives and that can be mistaken in what concerns the meaning of his actions and that according to Lacan, the judgment that man makes of his actions can not fail to consider the question of desire, even if it is unconscious.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-02-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/121
url http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/121
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/121/99427
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Psychology; v.3, n.2, 2012 (julho-dezembro); 56-60
Revista de Psicologia; v.3, n.2, 2012 (julho-dezembro); 56-60
2179-1740
0102-1222
reponame:Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online)
collection Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Psicologia (Fortaleza. Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revpsico@ufc.br||
_version_ 1797067734121447424